Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,010

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Molecular Marker for Chloroquine-Resistant Falciparum Malaria

Open access
Djimdé, Abdoulaye, Doumbo, Ogobara K., Cortese, Joseph F., Kayentao, Kassoum, Doumbo, Safi, Diourté, Yacouba, Coulibaly, Drissa, Dicko, Alassane, Su, Xin-zhuan, Nomura, Takashi, Fidock, David A., Wellems, Thomas E., Plowe, Christopher V.·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Chloroquine-resistant Plasmodium falciparum malaria is a major health problem, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa. Chloroquine resistance has been associated in vitro with point mutations in two genes, pfcrt and pfmdr 1, which encode the P. falciparum digestive-vacuole transmembrane proteins PfCRT and Pgh1, respectively. METHODS: To assess the value of these mutations as markers for clinical chloroquine resistance, we measured the association between the mutations and the response to chloroquine treatment in patients with uncomplicated falciparum malaria in Mali. The frequencies of the mutations in patients before and after treatment were compared for evidence of selection of resistance factors as a result of exposure to chloroquine. RESULTS: The pfcrt mutation resulting in the substitution of threonine (T76) for lysine at position 76 was present in all 60 samples from patients with chloroquine-resistant infections (those that persisted or recurred after treatment), as compared with a base-line prevalence of 41 percent in samples obtained before treatment from 116 randomly selected patients (P<0.001), indicating absolute selection for this mutation. The pfmdr 1 mutation resulting in the substitution of tyrosine for asparagine at position 86 was also selected for, since it was present in 48 of 56 post-treatment samples from patients with chloroquine-resistant infections (86 percent), as compared with a base-line prevalence of 50 percent in 115 samples obtained before treatment (P<0.001). The presence of pfcrt T76 was more strongly associated with the development of chloroquine resistance (odds ratio, 18.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 6.5 to 58.3) than was the presence of pfmdr 1 Y86 (odds ratio, 3.2; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.5 to 6.8) or the presence of both mutations (odds ratio, 9.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.4 to 22.1). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows an association between the pfcrt T76 mutation in P. falciparum and the development of chloroquine resistance during the treatment of malaria. This mutation can be used as a marker in surveillance for chloroquine-resistant falciparum malaria.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200101253440403

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,010

Metadata

Authors
Djimdé, A., Doumbo, O. K., Cortese, J. F., Kayentao, K., Doumbo, S., Diourté, Y., Coulibaly, D., Dicko, A., Su, X.-Z., Nomura, T., Fidock, D. A., Wellems, T. E., & Plowe, C. V.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-01-25
Volume
344
Issue
4
Pages
257-263
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2333050857
Cited by
1,010
References
0
FWCI
61.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Molecular Marker for Chloroquine-Resistant Falciparum Malaria. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200101253440403
The paper
Djimdé, A., Doumbo, O. K., Cortese, J. F., Kayentao, K., Doumbo, S., Diourté, Y., Coulibaly, D., Dicko, A., Su, X.-Z., Nomura, T., Fidock, D. A., Wellems, T. E., & Plowe, C. V. (2001). A Molecular Marker for Chloroquine-Resistant Falciparum Malaria. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200101253440403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.