Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 671

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Global Trends in Resistance to Antituberculosis Drugs

Espinal, Marcos A., Laszlo, Adalbert, Simonsen, Lone, Boulahbal, Fadila, Kim, Sang Jae, Reniero, Ana, Hoffner, Sven, Rieder, Hans L., Binkin, Nancy, Dye, Christopher, Williams, Rosamund, Raviglione, Mario C.·2001·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Data on global trends in resistance to antituberculosis drugs are lacking. METHODS: We expanded the survey conducted by the World Health Organization and the International Union against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease to assess trends in resistance to antituberculosis drugs in countries on six continents. We obtained data using standard protocols from ongoing surveillance or from surveys of representative samples of all patients with tuberculosis. The standard sampling techniques distinguished between new and previously treated patients, and laboratory performance was checked by means of an international program of quality assurance. RESULTS: Between 1996 and 1999, patients in 58 geographic sites were surveyed; 28 sites provided data for at least two years. For patients with newly diagnosed tuberculosis, the frequency of resistance to at least one antituberculosis drug ranged from 1.7 percent in Uruguay to 36.9 percent in Estonia (median, 10.7 percent). The prevalence increased in Estonia, from 28.2 percent in 1994 to 36.9 percent in 1998 (P=0.01), and in Denmark, from 9.9 percent in 1995 to 13.1 percent in 1998 (P=0.04). The median prevalence of multidrug resistance among new cases of tuberculosis was only 1.0 percent, but the prevalence was much higherin Estonia (14.1 percent), Henan Province in China (10.8 percent), Latvia (9.0 percent), the Russian oblasts of Ivanovo (9.0 percent) and Tomsk (6.5 percent), Iran (5.0 percent), and Zhejiang Province in China (4.5 percent). There were significant decreases in multidrug resistance in France and the United States. In Estonia, the prevalence in all cases increased from 11.7 percent in 1994 to 18.1 percent in 1998 (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Multidrug-resistant tuberculosis continues to be a serious problem, particularly among some countries of eastern Europe. Our survey also identified areas with a high prevalence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in such countries as China and Iran.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200104263441706

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 671

Metadata

Authors
Espinal, M. A., Laszlo, A., Simonsen, L., Boulahbal, F., Kim, S. J., Reniero, A., Hoffner, S., Rieder, H. L., Binkin, N., Dye, C., Williams, R., & Raviglione, M. C.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2001-04-26
Volume
344
Issue
17
Pages
1294-1303
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2338591221
Cited by
671
References
0
FWCI
49.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global Trends in Resistance to Antituberculosis Drugs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejm200104263441706
The paper
Espinal, M. A., Laszlo, A., Simonsen, L., Boulahbal, F., Kim, S. J., Reniero, A., Hoffner, S., Rieder, H. L., Binkin, N., Dye, C., Williams, R., & Raviglione, M. C. (2001). Global Trends in Resistance to Antituberculosis Drugs. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejm200104263441706

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.