Cited by 1,054Biosensors and Analytical DetectionBacterial Identification and Susceptibility TestingGlobal Health and Epidemiology

Diagnostics for the developing world

Mabey, David, Peeling, Rosanna W., Ustianowski, Andrew, Perkins, Mark D.·2004·Nature Reviews Microbiology

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nrmicro841

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Distance to care, lack of connectivity, and poor laboratory infrastructure in many resource-poor areas preclude widespread adoption of resource-heavy diagnostic techniques such as skin biopsy reads by dermatopathologists.

    “Distance to care, lack of connectivity, and poor laboratory infrastructure in many resource-poor areas precludes the widespread adoption of resource-heavy diagnostic techniques, such as skin biopsy reads by dermatopathologists”

    From Global Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations (2017) · cites this paper as [43]

  • Governments of India, Nepal, and Bangladesh pledged to eliminate visceral leishmaniasis by 2015, which along with improved treatment access prompted development of a simple point-of-care diagnostic tool detecting antibody agglutination.

    “The governments of India, Nepal, and Bangladesh pledged to eliminate visceral leishmaniasis by 2015, which along with improved treatment access, prompted the development of a simple point-of-care diagnostic tool which detects antibody agglutination”

    From Global Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations (2017) · cites this paper as [43]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mabey, D., Peeling, R. W., Ustianowski, A., & Perkins, M. D.
Affiliations
  • London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine (GB)
  • World Health Organization (CH)
  • The Royal Free Hospital (GB)
  • FIND (CH)
Corresponding author
Mabey, David
Venue
Nature Reviews Microbiology
Published
2004-03-01
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
231-240
ISSN
  • 1740-1526 (ISSN-L)
  • 1740-1534
OpenAlex
W1562219715
Cited by
1,054
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 47 · 2025: 43 · 2024: 76 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 72 · 2021: 74 · 2020: 64 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 79 · 2017: 61 · 2016: 59 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 62 · 2013: 44 · 2012: 54
FWCI
1.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature Reviews Microbiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Biosensors and Analytical Detection
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Global Health and Epidemiology
Keywords
diagnostic testing, infectious diseases, developing countries, malaria, acute respiratory infections, gastrointestinal infections, AIDS, tuberculosis, sexually transmitted infections, tropical parasitic diseases, disease burden, diagnostic access
MeSH terms
Communicable Diseases, Developing Countries, Diagnostic Tests, Routine, Diffusion of Innovation, Humans, Infection Control

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review