Cited by 16Chronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesRenin-Angiotensin System StudiesAcute Kidney Injury Research

Angiotensin-Receptor Blockers, Type 2 Diabetes, and Renoprotection

Antonio Ceriello, Enrico Motz·2002·New England Journal of Medicine

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejm200202283460912

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ceriello, A., & Motz, E.
Corresponding author
Antonio Ceriello
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2002-02-28
Volume
346
Issue
9
Pages
705-707
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2408970236
Cited by
16
References
15
Citations by year
2020: 1 · 2016: 1
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System (University of Udine) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Renin-Angiotensin System Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Acute Kidney Injury Research
Keywords
angiotensin receptor blockers, type 2 diabetes, renal protection, diabetic nephropathy, renin-angiotensin system
MeSH terms
Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, Diabetic Nephropathies, Humans, Hypertension, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review