The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Informed Consent, Comparative Effectiveness, and Learning Health Care
Abstract
The authors argue that in a learning health care system with ethically robust oversight policies, a streamlined consent process could replace formal written informed-consent procedures for many studies, and patient consent would not be required at all for some trials.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The recent INDEPENDENT trial replicated these findings in a low-resource setting (India). 615”
From Time for united action on depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission (2022) · cites this paper as [615]
Citations
Cites
Faden, R. R., Kass, N. E., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (2013) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.134 · Cited by 498
Self-citationKass, N. E., Faden, R. R., Goodman, S. N., Pronovost, P., Tunis, S., & Beauchamp, T. L. (2013) · Hastings Center Report · doi:10.1002/hast.133 · Cited by 235
Self-citationIs Informed Consent Always Necessary for Randomized, Controlled Trials?
Truog, R. D., Robinson, W. M., Randolph, A. G., & Morris, A. H. (1999) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199903113401013 · Cited by 192
Faden, R., KASS, N. E., Whicher, D. M., Stewart, W., & Tunis, S. (2013) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e31829b1e4b · Cited by 75
Self-citationRandomized, controlled trials as minimal risk: An ethical analysis*
Morris, M. C., & Nelson, R. M. (2007) · Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1097/01.ccm.0000257333.95528.b8 · Cited by 28
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Time for united action on depression: a Lancet–World Psychiatric Association Commission
Herrman, H., Patel, V., Kieling, C., Berk, M., Buchweitz, C., Cuijpers, P., Furukawa, T. A., Kessler, R. C., Kohrt, B. A., Maj, M., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02141-3 · Cited by 1,104
Paul, M., Daikos, G. L., Durante‐Mangoni, E., Yahav, D., Carmeli, Y., Benattar, Y. D., Skiada, A., Andini, R., Eliakim‐Raz, N., Nutman, A., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1016/s1473-3099(18)30099-9 · Cited by 626
Enduring and Emerging Challenges of Informed Consent
Grady, C. (2015) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra1411250 · Cited by 548
Mosquera, R. A., Avritscher, E. B. C., Samuels, C. L., Harris, T. S., Pedroza, C., Evans, P. W., Navarro, F., Wootton, S. H., Pacheco, S. E., Clifton, G. T., et al. (2014) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2014.16419 · Cited by 259
Primary care physicians and avoidable hospitalizations.
Parchman, M. L., & Culler, S. D. (1994) · PubMed · Cited by 218
Metadata
- Authors
- Faden, R. R., Beauchamp, T. L., & Kass, N. E.
- Affiliations
- Johns Hopkins University (US)
- Georgetown University (US)
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2014-02-20
- Volume
- 370
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 766-768
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2022826022
- Cited by
- 214
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 20 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 39 · 2014: 21
- FWCI
- 33.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Issues, ethics and legal aspects › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Keywords
- informed consent, comparative effectiveness research, clinical trials, ethical oversight, patient consent, research ethics
- MeSH terms
- Delivery of Health Care, Humans, Informed Consent, Patient Participation, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Ethics, Research, Comparative Effectiveness Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
