Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 877

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intravenous Zoledronic Acid in Postmenopausal Women with Low Bone Mineral Density

Open access
Reid, Ian R., Brown, Jacques P., Burckhardt, Peter, Horowitz, Zebulun, Richardson, Peter, Trechsel, Ulrich, Widmer, Albert, Devogelaer, Jean-Pierre, Kaufman, Jean-Marc, Jaeger, Philippe, Body, Jean-Jacques, Brandi, Maria Luisa, Broell, Johann, Di Micco, Raffaele, Genazzani, Andrea Riccardo, Felsenberg, Dieter, Happ, Joachim, Hooper, Michael J., Ittner, Jochen, Leb, Georg, Mallmin, Hans, Murray, Timothy, Ortolani, Sergio, Rubinacci, Alessandro, Sääf, Maria, Samsioe, Goran, Verbruggen, Leon, Meunier, Pierre J.·2002·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Bisphosphonates are effective agents for the management of osteoporosis. Their low bioavailability and low potency necessitate frequent administration on an empty stomach, which may reduce compliance. Gastrointestinal intolerance limits maximal dosing. Although intermittent intravenous treatments have been used, the optimal doses and dosing interval have not been systematically explored. METHODS: We studied the effects of five regimens of zoledronic acid, the most potent bisphosphonate, on bone turnover and density in 351 postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density in a one-year, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Women received placebo or intravenous zoledronic acid in doses of 0.25 mg, 0.5 mg, or 1 mg at three-month intervals. In addition, one group received a total annual dose of 4 mg as a single dose, and another received two doses of 2 mg each, six months apart. Lumbar-spine bone mineral density was the primary end point. RESULTS: There were similar increases in bone mineral density in all the zoledronic acid groups to values for the spine that were 4.3 to 5.1 percent higher than those in the placebo group (P<0.001) and values for the femoral neck that were 3.1 to 3.5 percent higher than those in the placebo group (P<0.001). Biochemical markers of bone resorption were significantly suppressed throughout the study in all zoledronic acid groups. Myalgia and pyrexia occurred more commonly in the zoledronic acid groups, but treatment-related dropout rates were similar to that in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: Zoledronic acid infusions given at intervals of up to one year produce effects on bone turnover and bone density as great as those achieved with daily oral dosing with bisphosphonates with proven efficacy against fractures, suggesting that an annual infusion of zoledronic acid might be an effective treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa011807

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 877

Metadata

Authors
Reid, I. R., Brown, J. P., Burckhardt, P., Horowitz, Z., Richardson, P., Trechsel, U., Widmer, A., Devogelaer, J.-P., Kaufman, J.-M., Jaeger, P., Body, J.-J., Brandi, M. L., Broell, J., Di Micco, R., Genazzani, A. R., Felsenberg, D., Happ, J., Hooper, M. J., Ittner, J., Leb, G., Mallmin, H., Murray, T., Ortolani, S., Rubinacci, A., Sääf, M., Samsioe, G., Verbruggen, L., & Meunier, P. J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2002-02-28
Volume
346
Issue
9
Pages
653-661
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1978228601
Cited by
877
References
4
FWCI
76.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.