Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 611

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer

Open access
Boyd, Norman F., Dite, Gillian S., Stone, Jennifer, Gunasekara, Anoma, English, Dallas R., McCredie, Margaret R.E., Giles, Graham G., Tritchler, David, Chiarelli, Anna, Yaffe, Martin J., Hopper, John L.·2002·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Women with extensive dense breast tissue visible on a mammogram have a risk of breast cancer that is 1.8 to 6.0 times that of women of the same age with little or no density. Menopausal status, weight, and parity account for 20 to 30 percent of the age-adjusted variation in the percentage of dense tissue. METHODS: We undertook two studies of twins to determine the proportion of the residual variation in the percentage of density measured by mammography that can be explained by unmeasured additive genetic factors (heritability). A total of 353 pairs of monozygotic twins and 246 pairs of dizygotic twins were recruited from the Australian Twin Registry, and 218 pairs of monozygotic twins and 134 pairs of dizygotic twins were recruited in Canada and the United States. Information on putative determinants of breast density was obtained by questionnaire. Mammograms were digitized, randomly ordered, and read by a blinded investigator. RESULTS: After adjustment for age and measured covariates, the correlation coefficient for the percentage of dense tissue was 0.61 for monozygotic pairs in Australia, 0.67 for monozygotic pairs in North America, 0.25 for dizygotic pairs in Australia, and 0.27 for dizygotic pairs in North America. According to the classic twin model, heritability (the proportion of variants attributable to additive genetic factors) accounted for 60 percent of the variation in density (95 percent confidence interval, 54 to 66) in Australian twins, 67 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 59 to 75) in North American twins, and 63 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 59 to 67) in all twins studied. CONCLUSIONS: These results show that the population variation in the percentage of dense tissue on mammography at a given age has high heritability. Because mammographic density is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer, finding the genes responsible for this phenotype could be important for understanding the causes of the disease.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa013390

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 611

Metadata

Authors
Boyd, N. F., Dite, G. S., Stone, J., Gunasekara, A., English, D. R., McCredie, M. R. E., Giles, G. G., Tritchler, D., Chiarelli, A., Yaffe, M. J., & Hopper, J. L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2002-09-19
Volume
347
Issue
12
Pages
886-894
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2010365793
Cited by
611
References
2
FWCI
16.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa013390
The paper
Boyd, N. F., Dite, G. S., Stone, J., Gunasekara, A., English, D. R., McCredie, M. R. E., Giles, G. G., Tritchler, D., Chiarelli, A., Yaffe, M. J., & Hopper, J. L. (2002). Heritability of Mammographic Density, a Risk Factor for Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa013390

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.