The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bone Loss and Bone Size after Menopause
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Bone loss increases after menopause. However, bone strength also depends on structural characteristics such as bone size. Whether bone size increases as a result of periosteal apposition and whether a strength index accounting for both bone density and bone size might predict the risk of fracture better than bone density alone are unclear. METHODS: Bone mass and the skeletal structure of the distal radius were evaluated by single-photon absorptiometry every other year in 108 women, all of whom were followed from the time of menopause for a mean period of 15 years. Postmenopausal serum estradiol levels and fractures of the distal radius were noted. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) annual decrease in bone mineral density was 1.9+/-0.7 percent. The medullary bone diameter increased annually by 1.1+/-0.9 percent, and the periosteal diameter by 0.7+/-0.3 percent; the strength index decreased by 0.7+/-0.7 percent. The expansion of the medullary diameter and the expansion of the periosteal diameter were correlated with one another (r = 0.54, P<0.001), and women in the highest quartile of medullary expansion had more loss of bone mineral density and greater periosteal apposition than women in the lowest quartile (P<0.001 for both comparisons). The postmenopausal serum estradiol level was correlated with changes in the periosteal diameter (r = -0.25, P=0.009) and with changes in bone mineral density (r = 0.34, P<0.001). A 1-SD decrement in the strength index at base line was associated with a risk ratio for fracture of the distal radius of 3.8 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.8 to 8.0). CONCLUSIONS: Increased bone loss after menopause is associated with increased periosteal apposition, which partially preserves bone strength. A strength index may be a helpful predictor of the risk of fracture.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Risk Factors for Hip Fracture in White Women
Cummings, S. R., Nevitt, M. C., Browner, W. S., Stone, K., Fox, K. M., Ensrud, K. E., Cauley, J., Black, D., & Vogt, T. M. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199503233321202 · Cited by 3,595
Effect of Risedronate on the Risk of Hip Fracture in Elderly Women
McClung, M. R., Geusens, P., Miller, P. D., Zippel, H., Bensen, W. G., Roux, C., Adami, S., Fogelman, I., Diamond, T., Eastell, R., et al. (2001) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200102013440503 · Cited by 1,918
Parfitt, A. M. (1994) · Journal of Cellular Biochemistry · doi:10.1002/jcb.240550303 · Cited by 1,001
Subperiosteal Expansion and Cortical Remodeling of the Human Femur and Tibia with Aging
Ruff, C. B., & Hayes, W. C. (1982) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7112107 · Cited by 318
Bone loss in relation to menopause: a prospective study during 16 years
Ahlborg, H. G., Johnell, O., Nilsson, B. E., Jeppsson, S., Rannevik, G., & Karlsson, M. K. (2001) · Bone · doi:10.1016/s8756-3282(00)00451-8 · Cited by 147
Self-citation
Cited by
Mechanical Stimulation of Bone in Vivo Reduces Osteocyte Expression of Sost/Sclerostin
Robling, A. G., Niziolek, P. J., Baldridge, L. A., Condon, K. W., Allen, M. R., Alam, I., Mantila, S. M., Gluhak-Heinrich, J., Bellido, T. M., Harris, S. E., et al. (2008) · Journal of Biological Chemistry · doi:10.1074/jbc.m705092200 · Cited by 1,350
Self-citationTang, B. M., Eslick, G. D., Nowson, C., Smith, C., & Bensoussan, A. (2007) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61342-7 · Cited by 1,248
Who’s afraid of the big bad Wolff?: “Wolff’s law” and bone functional adaptation
Ruff, C., Holt, B., & Trinkaus, E. (2006) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20371 · Cited by 994
Estrogens and androgens in skeletal physiology and pathophysiology
Almeida, M., Laurent, M. R., Dubois, V., Claessens, F., O'Brien, C. A., Bouillon, R., Vanderschueren, D., & Manolagas, S. C. (2017) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00033.2015 · Cited by 860
The aging of Wolff’s “law”: Ontogeny and responses to mechanical loading in cortical bone
Pearson, O. M., & Lieberman, D. E. (2004) · American Journal of Physical Anthropology · doi:10.1002/ajpa.20155 · Cited by 745
Metadata
- Authors
- Ahlborg, H. G., Johnell, O., Turner, C. H., Rannevik, G., & Karlsson, M. K.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2003-07-24
- Volume
- 349
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 327-334
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2045805069
- Cited by
- 643
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 36.94
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.