Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,078

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lumpectomy plus Tamoxifen with or without Irradiation in Women 70 Years of Age or Older with Early Breast Cancer

Open access
Hughes, Kevin S., Schnaper, Lauren A., Berry, Donald, Cirrincione, Constance, McCormick, Beryl, Shank, Brenda, Wheeler, Judith, Champion, Lorraine A., Smith, Thomas J., Smith, Barbara L., Shapiro, Charles, Muss, Hyman B., Winer, Eric, Hudis, Clifford, Wood, William, Sugarbaker, David, Henderson, I. Craig, Norton, Larry·2004·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In women 70 years of age or older who have early breast cancer, it is unclear whether lumpectomy plus tamoxifen is as effective as lumpectomy followed by tamoxifen plus radiation therapy. METHODS: Between July 1994 and February 1999, we randomly assigned 636 women who were 70 years of age or older and who had clinical stage I (T1N0M0 according to the tumor-node-metastasis classification), estrogen-receptor-positive breast carcinoma treated by lumpectomy to receive tamoxifen plus radiation therapy (317 women) or tamoxifen alone (319 women). Primary end points were the time to local or regional recurrence, the frequency of mastectomy for recurrence, breast-cancer-specific survival, the time to distant metastasis, and overall survival. RESULTS: The only significant difference between the two groups was in the rate of local or regional recurrence at five years (1 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 4 percent in the group given tamoxifen alone, P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to the rates of mastectomy for local recurrence, distant metastases, or five-year rates of overall survival (87 percent in the group given tamoxifen plus irradiation and 86 percent in the tamoxifen group, P=0.94). Assessment by physicians and patients of cosmetic results and adverse events uniformly rated tamoxifen plus irradiation inferior to tamoxifen alone. CONCLUSIONS: Lumpectomy plus adjuvant therapy with tamoxifen alone is a realistic choice for the treatment of women 70 years of age or older who have early, estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa040587

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 1,078

Metadata

Authors
Hughes, K. S., Schnaper, L. A., Berry, D., Cirrincione, C., McCormick, B., Shank, B., Wheeler, J., Champion, L. A., Smith, T. J., Smith, B. L., Shapiro, C., Muss, H. B., Winer, E., Hudis, C., Wood, W., Sugarbaker, D., Henderson, I. C., & Norton, L.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2004-09-02
Volume
351
Issue
10
Pages
971-977
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W1982853521
Cited by
1,078
References
1
FWCI
18.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lumpectomy plus Tamoxifen with or without Irradiation in Women 70 Years of Age or Older with Early Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa040587
The paper
Hughes, K. S., Schnaper, L. A., Berry, D., Cirrincione, C., McCormick, B., Shank, B., Wheeler, J., Champion, L. A., Smith, T. J., Smith, B. L., Shapiro, C., Muss, H. B., Winer, E., Hudis, C., Wood, W., Sugarbaker, D., Henderson, I. C., & Norton, L. (2004). Lumpectomy plus Tamoxifen with or without Irradiation in Women 70 Years of Age or Older with Early Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa040587

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.