Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,128

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mycophenolate Mofetil or Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Lupus Nephritis

Open access
Ginzler, Ellen M., Dooley, Mary Anne, Aranow, Cynthia, Kim, Mimi Y., Buyon, Jill, Merrill, Joan T., Petri, Michelle, Gilkeson, Gary S., Wallace, Daniel J., Weisman, Michael H., Appel, Gerald B.·2005·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since anecdotal series and small, prospective, controlled trials suggest that mycophenolate mofetil may be effective for treating lupus nephritis, larger trials are desirable. METHODS: We conducted a 24-week randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial comparing oral mycophenolate mofetil (initial dose, 1000 mg per day, increased to 3000 mg per day) with monthly intravenous cyclophosphamide (0.5 g per square meter of body-surface area, increased to 1.0 g per square meter) as induction therapy for active lupus nephritis. A change to the alternative regimen was allowed at 12 weeks in patients who did not have an early response. The study protocol specified adjunctive care and the use and tapering of corticosteroids. The primary end point was complete remission at 24 weeks (normalization of abnormal renal measurements and maintenance of baseline normal measurements). A secondary end point was partial remission at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of 140 patients recruited, 71 were randomly assigned to receive mycophenolate mofetil and 69 were randomly assigned to receive cyclophosphamide. At 12 weeks, 56 patients receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 42 receiving cyclophosphamide had satisfactory early responses. In the intention-to-treat analysis, 16 of the 71 patients (22.5 percent) receiving mycophenolate mofetil and 4 of the 69 patients receiving cyclophosphamide (5.8 percent) had complete remission, for an absolute difference of 16.7 percentage points (95 percent confidence interval, 5.6 to 27.9 percentage points; P=0.005), meeting the prespecified criteria for noninferiority and demonstrating the superiority of mycophenolate mofetil to cyclophosphamide. Partial remission occurred in 21 of the 71 patients (29.6 percent) and 17 of the 69 patients (24.6 percent), respectively (P=0.51). Three patients assigned to cyclophosphamide died, two during protocol therapy. Fewer severe infections and hospitalizations but more diarrhea occurred among those receiving mycophenolate. CONCLUSIONS: In this 24-week trial, mycophenolate mofetil was more effective than intravenous cyclophosphamide in inducing remission of lupus nephritis and had a more favorable safety profile.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa043731

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,128

Metadata

Authors
Ginzler, E. M., Dooley, M. A., Aranow, C., Kim, M. Y., Buyon, J., Merrill, J. T., Petri, M., Gilkeson, G. S., Wallace, D. J., Weisman, M. H., & Appel, G. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2005-11-24
Volume
353
Issue
21
Pages
2219-2228
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2160388191
Cited by
1,128
References
0
FWCI
40.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mycophenolate Mofetil or Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Lupus Nephritis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa043731
The paper
Ginzler, E. M., Dooley, M. A., Aranow, C., Kim, M. Y., Buyon, J., Merrill, J. T., Petri, M., Gilkeson, G. S., Wallace, D. J., Weisman, M. H., & Appel, G. B. (2005). Mycophenolate Mofetil or Intravenous Cyclophosphamide for Lupus Nephritis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa043731

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.