Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 416

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

In Vitro Fertilization with Single Blastocyst-Stage versus Single Cleavage-Stage Embryos

Papanikolaou, Evangelos G., Camus, Michel, Kolibianakis, Efstratios M., Van Landuyt, Lisbet, Van Steirteghem, Andre, Devroey, Paul·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-embryo transfer has been recommended to reduce the incidence of multiple gestations when in vitro fertilization is performed in women under 36 years of age. We designed a prospective, randomized, controlled trial to determine whether there were any differences in the rates of pregnancy and delivery between women undergoing transfer of a single cleavage-stage (day 3) embryo and those undergoing transfer of a single blastocyst-stage (day 5) embryo. METHODS: We studied 351 infertile women under 36 years of age who were randomly assigned to undergo transfer of either a single cleavage-stage embryo (176 patients) or a single blastocyst-stage embryo (175 patients). Multifollicular ovarian stimulation was performed with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist and recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone. RESULTS: The study was terminated early after a prespecified interim analysis (which included 50 percent of the planned number of patients) found a higher rate of pregnancy among women undergoing transfer of a single blastocyst-stage embryo (P=0.02). The rate of delivery was also significantly higher in this group than in the group undergoing transfer of a single cleavage-stage embryo (32.0 percent vs. 21.6 percent; relative risk, 1.48; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.04 to 2.11). Two multiple births occurred, both of monozygotic twins, both of which were in the group undergoing transfer of a single cleavage-stage embryo. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support the transfer of a single blastocyst-stage (day 5) embryo in infertile women under 36 years of age.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa053524

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 416

Metadata

Authors
Papanikolaou, E. G., Camus, M., Kolibianakis, E. M., Van Landuyt, L., Van Steirteghem, A., & Devroey, P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-03-16
Volume
354
Issue
11
Pages
1139-1146
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2088496077
Cited by
416
References
0
FWCI
34.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Fertilization with Single Blastocyst-Stage versus Single Cleavage-Stage Embryos. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa053524
The paper
Papanikolaou, E. G., Camus, M., Kolibianakis, E. M., Van Landuyt, L., Van Steirteghem, A., & Devroey, P. (2006). In Vitro Fertilization with Single Blastocyst-Stage versus Single Cleavage-Stage Embryos. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa053524

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.