Cited by 130Statistical Methods in Clinical TrialsMeta-analysis and systematic reviewsStatistical Methods in Epidemiology

Early stopping of randomized clinical trials for overt efficacy is problematic.

Bassler, Dirk, Montori, Victor M., Briel, Matthias, Glasziou, Paul, Guyatt, Gordon·2008·Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Abstract

Objective To illustrate controversial issues associated with stopping randomized controlled trials (RCTs) early for apparent benefit.Study design and setting The article presents our review of prior relevant work and our research group's reflections on early stopping.Results Compelling evidence suggests that trials stopped early for benefit systematically overestimate treatment effects, sometimes by a large amount. Unresolved controversies in trials stopped early for benefit include ethical and statistical problems in the interpretation of results.Conclusions The best strategy to minimize the problems associated with early stopping of RCTs for benefit is not to stop early. As an alternative, we suggest a threefold approach: a low P-value as the threshold for stopping at the time of interim analyses, not to look before a sufficiently large number of events has accrued and continuation of enrollment and follow-up for a further period.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.07.016

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bassler, D., Montori, V. M., Briel, M., Glasziou, P., & Guyatt, G.
Affiliations
  • University Children's Hospital Tübingen (DE)
  • University of Basel (CH)
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • McMaster University (CA)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
61
Issue
3
Pages
241-246
ISSN
0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2042803707
Cited by
130
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 9
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
  • Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
Keywords
early stopping, randomized controlled trials, interim analysis, overestimation of treatment effects, statistical power, p-value threshold, trial ethics
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Humans, Motivation, Bias, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Treatment Outcome, Ethics, Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review