Cited by 1,677Systemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments

Cyclophosphamide versus placebo in scleroderma lung disease

Open access
Tashkin, Donald P., Elashoff, Robert, Clements, Philip J., Goldin, Jonathan, Roth, Michael D., Furst, Daniel E., Arriola, Edgar, Silver, Richard +23 more·2006·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial to determine the effects of oral cyclophosphamide on lung function and health-related symptoms in patients with evidence of active alveolitis and scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease. METHODS: At 13 clinical centers throughout the United States, we enrolled 158 patients with scleroderma, restrictive lung physiology, dyspnea, and evidence of inflammatory interstitial lung disease on examination of bronchoalveolar-lavage fluid, thoracic high-resolution computed tomography, or both. Patients received oral cyclophosphamide (< or =2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day) or matching placebo for one year and were followed for an additional year. Pulmonary function was assessed every three months during the first year, and the primary end point was the forced vital capacity (FVC, expressed as a percentage of the predicted value) at 12 months, after adjustment for the baseline FVC. RESULTS: Of 158 patients, 145 completed at least six months of treatment and were included in the analysis. The mean absolute difference in adjusted 12-month FVC percent predicted between the cyclophosphamide and placebo groups was 2.53 percent (95 percent confidence interval, 0.28 to 4.79 percent), favoring cyclophosphamide (P<0.03). There were also treatment-related differences in physiological and symptom outcomes, and the difference in FVC was maintained at 24 months. There was a greater frequency of adverse events in the cyclophosphamide group, but the difference between the two groups in the number of serious adverse events was not significant. CONCLUSIONS: One year of oral cyclophosphamide in patients with symptomatic scleroderma-related interstitial lung disease had a significant but modest beneficial effect on lung function, dyspnea, thickening of the skin, and the health-related quality of life. The effects on lung function were maintained through the 24 months of the study.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa055120

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. The New England Journal of Medicine Downloaded from nejm.org on August 30, 2023. For personal use only. No other uses without permission. Copyright © 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. n engl j med 354;25
  2. BAL Cooperative Group Steering Com- mittee. Bronchoalveolar lavage constitu- ents in healthy individuals, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, and selected compar- ison groups. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;141: S169-S202.
  3. Mahler DA, Weinberg DH, Wells CK, Feinstein AR. The measurement of dys- pnea: contents, interobserver agreement, and physiologic correlates of two new clinical indexes. Chest 1984;85:751-8.
  4. I. Conceptual framework and item selec- tion. Med Care 1992;30:473-83.
  5. Steen VD, Medsger TA Jr. The value of the Health Assessment Questionnaire and special patient-generated scales to demon- strate change in systemic sclerosis patients 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. 23. 24. 25. 26. over time. Arthritis Rheum 1997;40:1984- 91.
  6. Clements PJ, Wong WK, Hurwitz EL, et al. The disability index of the Health Assessment Questionnaire is a predictor and correlate of outcome in the high-dose versus low-dose penicillamine in systemic sclerosis trial. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44: 653-61.
  7. Ferris BG. Epidemiology Standardiza- tion Project (American Thoracis Society). Am Rev Respir Dis 1978;118:1-120.
  8. Finkelstein DM, Schoenfeld DA. Com- bining mortality and longitudinal mea- sures in clinical trials. Stat Med 1999;18: 1341-54.
  9. Witek TJ Jr, Mahler DA. Minimal im- portant difference of the transition dys- pnoea index in multinational clinical tri- al. Eur Respir J 2003;21:267-72.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tashkin, D. P., Elashoff, R., Clements, P. J., Goldin, J., Roth, M. D., Furst, D. E., Arriola, E., Silver, R., Strange, C., Bolster, M., Seibold, J. R., Riley, D. J., Hsu, V. M., Varga, J., Schraufnagel, D. E., Theodore, A., Simms, R., Wise, R., Wigley, F., White, B., Steen, V., Read, C., Mayes, M., Parsley, E., Mubarak, K., Connolly, M. K., Golden, J., Olman, M., Fessler, B., Rothfield, N., & Metersky, M.
Affiliations
  • University of California, Los Angeles (US)
  • Boston University (US)
  • Medical University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Medicine and Dentistry of New Jersey (US)
  • University of Illinois Chicago (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Georgetown University (US)
  • Wayne State University (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • UConn Health (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2006-06-22
Volume
354
Issue
25
Pages
2655-2666
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2131014787
Cited by
1,677
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 45 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 85 · 2023: 76 · 2022: 92 · 2021: 138 · 2020: 129 · 2019: 110 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 75 · 2016: 97 · 2015: 64 · 2014: 56 · 2013: 67 · 2012: 65
FWCI
58.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u01hl060748-02)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (UO1 HL 60682, UO1 HL 60750, U01HL060750, UO1 HL 60895, U01HL060682, UO1 HL 60748, U01HL060895, UO1 HL 60839, U01HL060823, UO1HL 60587, U01HL060597, UO1 HL 60606, U01HL060839, U01HL060606, UO1 HL 60794, UO1 HL 50550, U01HL060794, UO1 HL 60838, U01HL060587, UO1 HL 60823, UO1 HL 60597)
  • National Center for Research Resources (M01RR000865)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Keywords
cyclophosphamide, systemic sclerosis, interstitial lung disease, alveolitis, lung function, forced vital capacity, dyspnea, health-related quality of life, adverse events, immunosuppressive therapy
MeSH terms
Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Autoimmune Diseases, Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid, Cyclophosphamide, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Leukopenia, Male, Middle Aged, Regression Analysis, Respiratory Function Tests, Scleroderma, Systemic, Vital Capacity, Treatment Outcome, Lung Diseases, Interstitial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review