Cited by 268Systemic Sclerosis and Related DiseasesInterstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary FibrosisPulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments

An open-label, phase II study of the safety and tolerability of pirfenidone in patients with scleroderma-associated interstitial lung disease: the LOTUSS trial

Open access
Khanna, Dinesh, Albera, Carlo, Fischer, Aryeh, Khalidi, Nader, Raghu, Ganesh, Chung, Lorinda, Chen, Dan, Schiopu, Elena +3 more·2016·The Journal of Rheumatology

Abstract

Objective.: Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) shares a number of clinical features and pathogenic mechanisms with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). This study was designed to evaluate the tolerability of the IPF treatment pirfenidone in SSc-ILD. The known gastrointestinal, skin, and liver adverse events (AE) of pirfenidone are of importance given the involvement of these organs in SSc. Methods.: All patients received pirfenidone and were randomized 1:1 to either a 2- or 4-week titration starting at 801 mg/day and finishing at a maintenance dose of 2403 mg/day. Patients received pirfenidone for 16 weeks in total. Assessments included treatment-emergent AE (TEAE) and exploratory disease outcomes. Results.: Sixty-three patients were randomized; 96.8% experienced a TEAE and more patients reported TEAE during the titration versus the maintenance period. The most commonly reported TEAE were consistent with those observed for pirfenidone in IPF (nausea, headache, fatigue) and were similar regardless of titration schedule. More patients discontinued treatment because of TEAE in the 2- versus 4-week titration group (5 vs 1, respectively); all discontinuation events occurred > 3 weeks after reaching the full dose of pirfenidone. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), taken by 63.5% of patients in addition to pirfenidone, did not appear to affect tolerability. Exploratory disease outcomes remained largely unchanged. Conclusion.: Pirfenidone showed an acceptable tolerability profile in SSc-ILD, although a longer titration may be associated with better tolerability. Tolerability was not affected by concomitant MMF. The present findings support further investigation of pirfenidone in future clinical trials in patients with SSc-ILD. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov; www.clinicaltrials.govNCT01933334.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3899/jrheum.151322

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In an open label phase 2 study of 63 SSc patients with ILD, pirfenidone had no beneficial effects on disease outcomes.

    “However, in an open label phase 2 study with 63 SSc patients with ILD, no beneficial effects of pirfenidone were observed on disease outcomes (187).”

    From Unraveling SSc Pathophysiology; The Myofibroblast (2018) · cites this paper as [187]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 31 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Khanna, D., Albera, C., Fischer, A., Khalidi, N., Raghu, G., Chung, L., Chen, D., Schiopu, E., Tagliaferri, M., Seibold, J. R., & Gorina, E.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Venue
The Journal of Rheumatology
Published
2016-07-01
Volume
43
Issue
9
Pages
1672-1679
ISSN
  • 0315-162X (ISSN-L)
  • 1499-2752
OpenAlex
W2472891063
Cited by
268
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 24 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 7
FWCI
25.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Rheumatology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Institutional Research Information System University of Turin (University of Turin) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Systemic Sclerosis and Related Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Interstitial Lung Diseases and Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Pulmonary Hypertension Research and Treatments
Keywords
pirfenidone, systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease, drug tolerability, adverse events, dose titration, mycophenolate mofetil, treatment-emergent adverse events, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-Steroidal, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mycophenolic Acid, Pyridones, Scleroderma, Systemic, Treatment Outcome, Lung Diseases, Interstitial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review