The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Endoscopic versus Surgical Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct in Chronic Pancreatitis
Abstract
BACKGROUND: For patients with chronic pancreatitis and a dilated pancreatic duct, ductal decompression is recommended. We conducted a randomized trial to compare endoscopic and surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct. METHODS: All symptomatic patients with chronic pancreatitis and a distal obstruction of the pancreatic duct but without an inflammatory mass were eligible for the study. We randomly assigned patients to undergo endoscopic transampullary drainage of the pancreatic duct or operative pancreaticojejunostomy. The primary end point was the average Izbicki pain score during 2 years of follow-up. The secondary end points were pain relief at the end of follow-up, physical and mental health, morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, number of procedures undergone, and changes in pancreatic function. RESULTS: Thirty-nine patients underwent randomization: 19 to endoscopic treatment (16 of whom underwent lithotripsy) and 20 to operative pancreaticojejunostomy. During the 24 months of follow-up, patients who underwent surgery, as compared with those who were treated endoscopically, had lower Izbicki pain scores (25 vs. 51, P<0.001) and better physical health summary scores on the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey questionnaire (P=0.003). At the end of follow-up, complete or partial pain relief was achieved in 32% of patients assigned to endoscopic drainage as compared with 75% of patients assigned to surgical drainage (P=0.007). Rates of complications, length of hospital stay, and changes in pancreatic function were similar in the two treatment groups, but patients receiving endoscopic treatment required more procedures than did patients in the surgery group (a median of eight vs. three, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgical drainage of the pancreatic duct was more effective than endoscopic treatment in patients with obstruction of the pancreatic duct due to chronic pancreatitis. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN04572410 [controlled-trials.com].).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Ware, J. E. (2000) · Spine · doi:10.1097/00007632-200012150-00008 · Cited by 4,455
Cited by
Diagnosis and Management of Chronic Pancreatitis: A Review
Singh, V. K., Yadav, D., & Garg, P. K. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.19411 · Cited by 486
Braganza, J. M., Lee, S. H., McCloy, R. F., & McMahon, M. J. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)61852-1 · Cited by 469
Pancreatic Islet Transplantation in Humans: Recent Progress and Future Directions
Rickels, M. R., & Robertson, R. P. (2019) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2018-00154 · Cited by 329
Guidelines for the understanding and management of pain in chronic pancreatitis
Drewes, A. M., Bouwense, S. A. W., Campbell, C. M., Ceyhan, G. O., Delhaye, M., Demir, I. E., Garg, P. K., van Goor, H., Halloran, C., Isaji, S., et al. (2017) · Pancreatology · doi:10.1016/j.pan.2017.07.006 · Cited by 321
Issa, Y., Kempeneers, M. A., Bruno, M. J., Fockens, P., Poley, J.-W., Ahmed Ali, U., Bollen, T. L., Busch, O. R., Dejong, C. H., van Duijvendijk, P., et al. (2020) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2019.20967 · Cited by 261
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Cahen, D. L., Gouma, D. J., Nio, Y., Rauws, E. A. J., Boermeester, M. A., Busch, O. R., Stoker, J., Laméris, J. S., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Huibregtse, K., & Bruno, M. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-02-15
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 676-684
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2063098623
- Cited by
- 847
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 50.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic versus Surgical Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct in Chronic Pancreatitis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa060610
- The paper
- Cahen, D. L., Gouma, D. J., Nio, Y., Rauws, E. A. J., Boermeester, M. A., Busch, O. R., Stoker, J., Laméris, J. S., Dijkgraaf, M. G. W., Huibregtse, K., & Bruno, M. J. (2007). Endoscopic versus Surgical Drainage of the Pancreatic Duct in Chronic Pancreatitis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa060610
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.