Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 356

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Prophylactic Fluconazole in Preterm Neonates

Open access
Manzoni, Paolo, Stolfi, Ilaria, Pugni, Lorenza, Decembrino, Lidia, Magnani, Cristiana, Vetrano, Gennaro, Tridapalli, Elisabetta, Corona, Giuseppina, Giovannozzi, Chiara, Farina, Daniele, Arisio, Riccardo, Merletti, Franco, Maule, Milena, Mosca, Fabio, Pedicino, Roberto, Stronati, Mauro, Mostert, Michael, Gomirato, Giovanna·2007·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Invasive candida infections are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in preterm infants. We performed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of fluconazole for the prevention of fungal colonization and infection in very-low-birth-weight neonates. METHODS: During a 15-month period, all neonates weighing less than 1500 g at birth from eight tertiary Italian neonatal intensive care units (322 infants) were randomly assigned to receive either fluconazole (at a dose of either 6 mg or 3 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo from birth until day 30 of life (day 45 for neonates weighing <1000 g at birth). We performed weekly surveillance cultures and systematic fungal susceptibility testing. RESULTS: Among infants receiving fluconazole, fungal colonization occurred in 9.8% in the 6-mg group and 7.7% in the 3-mg group, as compared with 29.2% in the placebo group (P<0.001 for both fluconazole groups vs. the placebo group). The incidence of invasive fungal infection was 2.7% in the 6-mg group and 3.8% in the 3-mg group, as compared with 13.2% in the placebo group (P=0.005 for the 6-mg group and P=0.02 for the 3-mg group vs. the placebo group). The use of fluconazole did not modify the relationship between colonization and the subsequent development of invasive fungal infection. Overall mortality was similar among groups, as was the incidence of cholestasis. No evidence for the emergence of resistant candida species was observed, but the study did not have substantial power to detect such an effect. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic fluconazole reduces the incidence of colonization and invasive candida infection in neonates weighing less than 1500 g at birth. The benefit of treating candida colonization is unclear. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN85753869 [controlled-trials.com]).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa065733

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 356

Metadata

Authors
Manzoni, P., Stolfi, I., Pugni, L., Decembrino, L., Magnani, C., Vetrano, G., Tridapalli, E., Corona, G., Giovannozzi, C., Farina, D., Arisio, R., Merletti, F., Maule, M., Mosca, F., Pedicino, R., Stronati, M., Mostert, M., & Gomirato, G.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2007-06-14
Volume
356
Issue
24
Pages
2483-2495
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2143687882
Cited by
356
References
3
FWCI
22.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Prophylactic Fluconazole in Preterm Neonates. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa065733
The paper
Manzoni, P., Stolfi, I., Pugni, L., Decembrino, L., Magnani, C., Vetrano, G., Tridapalli, E., Corona, G., Giovannozzi, C., Farina, D., Arisio, R., Merletti, F., Maule, M., Mosca, F., Pedicino, R., Stronati, M., Mostert, M., & Gomirato, G. (2007). A Multicenter, Randomized Trial of Prophylactic Fluconazole in Preterm Neonates. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa065733

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.