The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Injectable Paromomycin for Visceral Leishmaniasis in India
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Visceral leishmaniasis (kala-azar) affects large, rural, resource-poor populations in South Asia, Africa, and Brazil. Safe, effective, and affordable new therapies are needed. We conducted a randomized, controlled, phase 3 open-label study comparing paromomycin, an aminoglycoside, with amphotericin B, the present standard of care in Bihar, India. METHODS: In four treatment centers for visceral leishmaniasis, 667 patients between 5 and 55 years of age who were negative for the human immunodeficiency virus and had parasitologically confirmed visceral leishmaniasis were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to receive paromomycin (502 patients) at a dose of 11 mg per kilogram of body weight intramuscularly daily for 21 days or amphotericin B (165 patients) at a dose of 1 mg per kilogram intravenously every other day for 30 days. Final cure was assessed 6 months after the end of treatment; safety assessments included daily clinical evaluations and weekly laboratory and audiometric evaluations. Noninferiority testing was used to compare 6-month cure rates, with a chosen margin of noninferiority of 10 percentage points. RESULTS: Paromomycin was shown to be noninferior to amphotericin B (final cure rate, 94.6% vs. 98.8%; difference, 4.2 percentage points; upper bound of the 97.5% confidence interval, 6.9; P<0.001). Mortality rates in the two groups were less than 1%. Adverse events, which were more common among patients receiving paromomycin than among those receiving amphotericin B (6% vs. 2%, P=0.02), included transient elevation of aspartate aminotransferase levels (>3 times the upper limit of the normal range); transient reversible ototoxicity (2% vs. 0, P=0.20); and injection-site pain (55% vs. 0, P<0.001); and in patients receiving amphotericin B, as compared with those receiving paromomycin, nephrotoxicity (4% vs. 0, P<0.001), fevers (57% vs. 3%), rigors (24% vs. 0, P<0.001), and vomiting (10% vs. <1%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Paromomycin was shown to be noninferior to amphotericin B for the treatment of visceral leishmaniasis in India. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00216346.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Walsh, T. J., Pappas, P., Winston, D. J., Lazarus, H. M., Petersen, F., Raffalli, J., Yanovich, S., Stiff, P., Greenberg, R., Donowitz, G., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200201243460403 · Cited by 979
Cited by
Sundar, S., Sinha, P. K., Rai, M., Verma, D. K., Nawin, K., Alam, S., Chakravarty, J., Vaillant, M., Verma, N., Pandey, K., et al. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(10)62050-8 · Cited by 337
Self-citationLiposomal amphotericin B and leishmaniasis: Dose and response
Sundar, S., & Chakravarty, J. (2010) · Journal of Global Infectious Diseases · doi:10.4103/0974-777x.62886 · Cited by 217
Self-citationMultiple deadlocks in the development of nonprofit drugs
Cvek, B. (2022) · Drug Discovery Today · doi:10.1016/j.drudis.2022.06.001 · Cited by 5
Metadata
- Authors
- Sundar, S., Jha, T. K., Thakur, C. P., Sinha, P. K., & Bhattacharya, S. K.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-06-21
- Volume
- 356
- Issue
- 25
- Pages
- 2571-2581
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2103921559
- Cited by
- 471
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 35.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Injectable Paromomycin for Visceral Leishmaniasis in India. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa066536
- The paper
- Sundar, S., Jha, T. K., Thakur, C. P., Sinha, P. K., & Bhattacharya, S. K. (2007). Injectable Paromomycin for Visceral Leishmaniasis in India. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa066536
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.