The DOI matches its Crossref record.
In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Pregnancy rates in women of advanced maternal age undergoing in vitro fertilization (IVF) are disappointingly low. It has been suggested that the use of preimplantation genetic screening of cleavage-stage embryos for aneuploidies may improve the effectiveness of IVF in these women. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing three cycles of IVF with and without preimplantation genetic screening in women 35 through 41 years of age. The primary outcome measure was ongoing pregnancy at 12 weeks of gestation. The secondary outcome measures were biochemical pregnancy, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth. RESULTS: Four hundred eight women (206 assigned to preimplantation genetic screening and 202 assigned to the control group) underwent 836 cycles of IVF (434 cycles with and 402 cycles without preimplantation genetic screening). The ongoing-pregnancy rate was significantly lower in the women assigned to preimplantation genetic screening (52 of 206 women [25%]) than in those not assigned to preimplantation genetic screening (74 of 202 women [37%]; rate ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.51 to 0.93). The women assigned to preimplantation genetic screening also had a significantly lower live-birth rate (49 of 206 women [24%] vs. 71 of 202 women [35%]; rate ratio, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Preimplantation genetic screening did not increase but instead significantly reduced the rates of ongoing pregnancies and live births after IVF in women of advanced maternal age. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN76355836 [controlled-trials.com].).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The use of morphokinetics as a predictor of embryo implantation
Meseguer, M., Herrero, J., Tejera, A., Hilligsoe, K. M., Ramsing, N. B., & Remohi, J. (2011) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/der256 · Cited by 913
A Decade of Reversal: An Analysis of 146 Contradicted Medical Practices
Prasad, V., Vandross, A., Toomey, C., Cheung, M., Rho, J., Quinn, S., Chacko, S. J., Borkar, D., Gall, V., Selvaraj, S., et al. (2013) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2013.05.012 · Cited by 381
The ESHRE PGD Consortium: 10 years of data collection
Harper, J. C., Wilton, L., Traeger-Synodinos, J., Goossens, V., Moutou, C., SenGupta, S. B., Pehlivan Budak, T., Renwick, P., De Rycke, M., Geraedts, J. P. M., et al. (2012) · Human Reproduction Update · doi:10.1093/humupd/dmr052 · Cited by 299
The Harbin Consensus Conference Workshop Group, Chairs:, C., Legro, R. S., Wu, X., Scientific Committee:, Barnhart, K. T., Farquhar, C., Fauser, B. C. J. M., Mol, B., Legro, R. S., et al. (2014) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/humrep/deu218 · Cited by 129
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis at 20 years
Simpson, J. L. (2010) · Prenatal Diagnosis · doi:10.1002/pd.2552 · Cited by 117
Metadata
- Authors
- Mastenbroek, S., Twisk, M., van Echten-Arends, J., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Korevaar, J. C., Verhoeve, H. R., Vogel, N. E. A., Arts, E. G. J. M., de Vries, J. W. A., Bossuyt, P. M., Buys, C. H. C. M., Heineman, M. J., Repping, S., & van der Veen, F.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-07-05
- Volume
- 357
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 9-17
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2147121501
- Cited by
- 776
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 67.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa067744
- The paper
- Mastenbroek, S., Twisk, M., van Echten-Arends, J., Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Korevaar, J. C., Verhoeve, H. R., Vogel, N. E. A., Arts, E. G. J. M., de Vries, J. W. A., Bossuyt, P. M., Buys, C. H. C. M., Heineman, M. J., Repping, S., & van der Veen, F. (2007). In Vitro Fertilization with Preimplantation Genetic Screening. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa067744
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.