The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Weekly Paclitaxel in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: We compared the efficacy of two different taxanes, docetaxel and paclitaxel, given either weekly or every 3 weeks, in the adjuvant treatment of breast cancer. METHODS: We enrolled 4950 women with axillary lymph node-positive or high-risk, lymph node-negative breast cancer. After randomization, all patients first received 4 cycles of intravenous doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide at 3-week intervals and were then assigned to intravenous paclitaxel or docetaxel given at 3-week intervals for 4 cycles or at 1-week intervals for 12 cycles. The primary end point was disease-free survival. RESULTS: As compared with patients receiving standard therapy (paclitaxel every 3 weeks), the odds ratio for disease-free survival was 1.27 among those receiving weekly paclitaxel (P=0.006), 1.23 among those receiving docetaxel every 3 weeks (P=0.02), and 1.09 among those receiving weekly docetaxel (P=0.29) (with an odds ratio >1 favoring the groups receiving experimental therapy). As compared with standard therapy, weekly paclitaxel was also associated with improved survival (odds ratio, 1.32; P=0.01). An exploratory analysis of a subgroup of patients whose tumors expressed no human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 protein found similar improvements in disease-free and overall survival with weekly paclitaxel treatment, regardless of hormone-receptor expression. Grade 2, 3, or 4 neuropathy was more frequent with weekly paclitaxel than with paclitaxel every 3 weeks (27% vs. 20%). CONCLUSIONS: Weekly paclitaxel after standard adjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide improves disease-free and overall survival in women with breast cancer. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00004125 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Hatzis, C. (2011) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2011.593 · Cited by 699
van Ramshorst, M. S., van der Voort, A., van Werkhoven, E. D., Mandjes, I. A., Kemper, I., Dezentjé, V. O., Oving, I. M., Honkoop, A. H., Tick, L. W., van de Wouw, A. J., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(18)30570-9 · Cited by 452
Weekly vs. Every-3-Week Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Ovarian Cancer
Chan, J. K., Brady, M. F., Penson, R. T., Huang, H., Birrer, M. J., Walker, J. L., DiSilvestro, P. A., Rubin, S. C., Martin, L. P., Davidson, S. A., et al. (2016) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1505067 · Cited by 367
Conde, J., Oliva, N., Atilano, M., Song, H. S., & Artzi, N. (2016) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat4497 · Cited by 283
Long term side effects of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early breast cancer
Tao, J. J., Visvanathan, K., & Wolff, A. C. (2015) · The Breast · doi:10.1016/j.breast.2015.07.035 · Cited by 258
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sparano, J. A., Wang, M., Martino, S., Jones, V., Perez, E. A., Saphner, T., Wolff, A. C., Sledge, G. W., Wood, W. C., & Davidson, N. E.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2008-04-17
- Volume
- 358
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1663-1671
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2123528875
- Cited by
- 997
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 34.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weekly Paclitaxel in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0707056
- The paper
- Sparano, J. A., Wang, M., Martino, S., Jones, V., Perez, E. A., Saphner, T., Wolff, A. C., Sledge, G. W., Wood, W. C., & Davidson, N. E. (2008). Weekly Paclitaxel in the Adjuvant Treatment of Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0707056
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.