The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Weekly vs. Every-3-Week Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Ovarian Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: A dose-dense weekly schedule of paclitaxel (resulting in a greater frequency of drug delivery) plus carboplatin every 3 weeks or the addition of bevacizumab to paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks has shown efficacy in ovarian cancer. We proposed to determine whether dose-dense weekly paclitaxel and carboplatin would prolong progression-free survival as compared with paclitaxel and carboplatin administered every 3 weeks among patients receiving and those not receiving bevacizumab. METHODS: We prospectively stratified patients according to whether they elected to receive bevacizumab and then randomly assigned them to receive either paclitaxel, administered intravenously at a dose of 175 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks, plus carboplatin (dose equivalent to an area under the curve [AUC] of 6) for six cycles or paclitaxel, administered weekly at a dose of 80 mg per square meter, plus carboplatin (AUC, 6) for six cycles. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS: A total of 692 patients were enrolled, 84% of whom opted to receive bevacizumab. In the intention-to-treat analysis, weekly paclitaxel was not associated with longer progression-free survival than paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks (14.7 months and 14.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.74 to 1.06; P=0.18). Among patients who did not receive bevacizumab, weekly paclitaxel was associated with progression-free survival that was 3.9 months longer than that observed with paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks (14.2 vs. 10.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40 to 0.95; P=0.03). However, among patients who received bevacizumab, weekly paclitaxel did not significantly prolong progression-free survival, as compared with paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks (14.9 months and 14.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.20; P=0.60). A test for interaction that assessed homogeneity of the treatment effect showed a significant difference between treatment with bevacizumab and without bevacizumab (P=0.047). Patients who received weekly paclitaxel had a higher rate of grade 3 or 4 anemia than did those who received paclitaxel every 3 weeks (36% vs. 16%), as well as a higher rate of grade 2 to 4 sensory neuropathy (26% vs. 18%); however, they had a lower rate of grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (72% vs. 83%). CONCLUSIONS: Overall, weekly paclitaxel, as compared with paclitaxel administered every 3 weeks, did not prolong progression-free survival among patients with ovarian cancer. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute and Genentech; GOG-0262 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01167712.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Siegel, R. L., Miller, K. D., & Jemal, A. (2016) · CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians · doi:10.3322/caac.21332 · Cited by 16,003
Evaluation of survival data and two new rank order statistics arising in its consideration.
Mantel, N. (1966) · PubMed · Cited by 7,519
Oxaliplatin, Fluorouracil, and Leucovorin as Adjuvant Treatment for Colon Cancer
André, T., Boni, C., Mounedji-Boudiaf, L., Navarro, M., Tabernero, J., Hickish, T., Topham, C., Zaninelli, M., Clingan, P., Bridgewater, J., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032709 · Cited by 3,689
Incorporation of Bevacizumab in the Primary Treatment of Ovarian Cancer
Burger, R. A., Brady, M. F., Bookman, M. A., Fleming, G. F., Monk, B. J., Huang, H., Mannel, R. S., Homesley, H. D., Fowler, J., Greer, B. E., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1104390 · Cited by 2,404
Self-citationPocock, S. J., & Simon, R. (1975) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2529712 · Cited by 2,350
Normalizing tumor vasculature with anti-angiogenic therapy: A new paradigm for combination therapy
Jain, R. K. (2001) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm0901-987 · Cited by 2,184
A Phase 3 Trial of Bevacizumab in Ovarian Cancer
Perren, T. J., Swart, A. M., Pfisterer, J., Ledermann, J. A., Pujade-Lauraine, E., Kristensen, G., Carey, M. S., Beale, P., Cervantes, A., Kurzeder, C., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1103799 · Cited by 2,172
Reactivity of a monoclonal antibody with human ovarian carcinoma.
Bast, R. C., Feeney, M., Lazarus, H., Nadler, L. M., Colvin, R. B., & Knapp, R. C. (1981) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci110380 · Cited by 1,661
Pujade-Lauraine, E., Hilpert, F., Weber, B., Reuss, A., Poveda, A., Kristensen, G., Sorio, R., Vergote, I., Witteveen, P., Bamias, A., et al. (2014) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2013.51.4489 · Cited by 1,622
Cited by
Lheureux, S., Gourley, C., Vergote, I., & Oza, A. M. (2019) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(18)32552-2 · Cited by 1,919
Matulonis, U. A., Sood, A. K., Fallowfield, L., Howitt, B. E., Sehouli, J., & Karlan, B. Y. (2016) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2016.61 · Cited by 1,362
Colombo, N., Sessa, C., du Bois, A., Ledermann, J., McCluggage, W. G., McNeish, I., Morice, P., Pignata, S., Ray-Coquard, I., Vergote, I., et al. (2019) · Annals of Oncology · doi:10.1093/annonc/mdz062 · Cited by 1,197
Advances in ovarian cancer therapy
Cortez, A. J., Tudrej, P., Kujawa, K. A., & Lisowska, K. M. (2018) · Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology · doi:10.1007/s00280-017-3501-8 · Cited by 624
Clinical and translational advances in ovarian cancer therapy
Konstantinopoulos, P. A., & Matulonis, U. A. (2023) · Nature Cancer · doi:10.1038/s43018-023-00617-9 · Cited by 394
Metadata
- Authors
- Chan, J. K., Brady, M. F., Penson, R. T., Huang, H., Birrer, M. J., Walker, J. L., DiSilvestro, P. A., Rubin, S. C., Martin, L. P., Davidson, S. A., Huh, W. K., O’Malley, D. M., Boente, M. P., Michael, H., & Monk, B. J.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2016-02-25
- Volume
- 374
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 738-748
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2329492928
- Cited by
- 367
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 57.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Weekly vs. Every-3-Week Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Ovarian Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1505067
- The paper
- Chan, J. K., Brady, M. F., Penson, R. T., Huang, H., Birrer, M. J., Walker, J. L., DiSilvestro, P. A., Rubin, S. C., Martin, L. P., Davidson, S. A., Huh, W. K., O’Malley, D. M., Boente, M. P., Michael, H., & Monk, B. J. (2016). Weekly vs. Every-3-Week Paclitaxel and Carboplatin for Ovarian Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1505067
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.