The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Minimizing Ventricular Pacing to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation in Sinus-Node Disease
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Conventional dual-chamber pacing maintains atrioventricular synchrony but results in high percentages of ventricular pacing, which causes ventricular desynchronization and has been linked to an increased risk of atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus-node disease. METHODS: We randomly assigned 1065 patients with sinus-node disease, intact atrioventricular conduction, and a normal QRS interval to receive conventional dual-chamber pacing (535 patients) or dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing with the use of new pacemaker features designed to promote atrioventricular conduction, preserve ventricular conduction, and prevent ventricular desynchronization (530 patients). The primary end point was time to persistent atrial fibrillation. RESULTS: The mean (+/-SD) follow-up period was 1.7+/-1.0 years when the trial was stopped because it had met the primary end point. The median percentage of ventricular beats that were paced was lower in dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing than in conventional dual-chamber pacing (9.1% vs. 99.0%, P<0.001), whereas the percentage of atrial beats that were paced was similar in the two groups (71.4% vs. 70.4%, P=0.96). Persistent atrial fibrillation developed in 110 patients, 68 (12.7%) in the group assigned to conventional dual-chamber pacing and 42 (7.9%) in the group assigned to dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing. The hazard ratio for development of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing as compared with those with conventional dual-chamber pacing was 0.60 (95% confidence interval, 0.41 to 0.88; P=0.009), indicating a 40% reduction in relative risk. The absolute reduction in risk was 4.8%. The mortality rate was similar in the two groups (4.9% in the group receiving dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing vs. 5.4% in the group receiving conventional dual-chamber pacing, P=0.54). CONCLUSIONS: Dual-chamber minimal ventricular pacing, as compared with conventional dual-chamber pacing, prevents ventricular desynchronization and moderately reduces the risk of persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with sinus-node disease. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00284830 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Regression Models and Life-Tables
Cox, D. R. (1972) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1972.tb00899.x · Cited by 39,793
Sweeney, M. O., Hellkamp, A. S., Ellenbogen, K. A., Greenspon, A. J., Freedman, R. A., Lee, K. L., & Lamas, G. A. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000072769.17295.b1 · Cited by 1,773
Self-citationAndersen, H. R., Nielsen, J. C., Thomsen, P. E. B., Thuesen, L., Mortensen, P. T., Vesterlund, T., & Pedersen, A. K. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)03425-9 · Cited by 841
Connolly, S. J., Kerr, C. R., Gent, M., Roberts, R. S., Yusuf, S., Gillis, A. M., Sami, M. H., Talajic, M., Tang, A. S. L., Klein, G. J., et al. (2000) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm200005113421902 · Cited by 775
Glotzer, T. V., Hellkamp, A. S., Zimmerman, J., Sweeney, M. O., Yee, R., Marinchak, R., Cook, J., Paraschos, A., Love, J., Radoslovich, G., et al. (2003) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/01.cir.0000057981.70380.45 · Cited by 750
Self-citation
Cited by
Joglar, J. A., Chung, M. K., Armbruster, A. L., Benjamin, E. J., Chyou, J. Y., Cronin, E. M., Deswal, A., Eckhardt, L. L., Goldberger, Z. D., Gopinathannair, R., et al. (2024) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000001193 · Cited by 2,765
ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 guidelines for device-based therapy of cardiac rhythm abnormalities
Epstein, A. E., DiMarco, J. P., Ellenbogen, K. A., Estes, N. A. M., Freedman, R. A., Gettes, L. S., Gillinov, A. M., Gregoratos, G., Hammill, S. C., Hayes, D. L., et al. (2008) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2008.02.032 · Cited by 2,546
Self-citation2021 ESC Guidelines on cardiac pacing and cardiac resynchronization therapy
Glikson, M., Nielsen, J. C., Kronborg, M. B., Michowitz, Y., Auricchio, A., Barbash, I. M., Barrabés, J. A., Boriani, G., Braunschweig, F., Brignole, M., et al. (2021) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehab364 · Cited by 2,019
Kusumoto, F. M., Schoenfeld, M. H., Barrett, C., Edgerton, J. R., Ellenbogen, K. A., Gold, M. R., Goldschlager, N. F., Hamilton, R. M., Joglar, J. A., Kim, R. J., et al. (2019) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.044 · Cited by 1,008
2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation
Joglar, J. A., Chung, M. K., Armbruster, A. L., Benjamin, E. J., Chyou, J. Y., Cronin, E. M., Deswal, A., Eckhardt, L. L., Goldberger, Z. D., Gopinathannair, R., et al. (2024) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2023.08.017 · Cited by 933
Metadata
- Authors
- Sweeney, M. O., Bank, A. J., Nsah, E., Koullick, M., Zeng, Q. C., Hettrick, D., Sheldon, T., & Lamas, G. A.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2007-09-06
- Volume
- 357
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1000-1008
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2095280876
- Cited by
- 520
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 24.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Minimizing Ventricular Pacing to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation in Sinus-Node Disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa071880
- The paper
- Sweeney, M. O., Bank, A. J., Nsah, E., Koullick, M., Zeng, Q. C., Hettrick, D., Sheldon, T., & Lamas, G. A. (2007). Minimizing Ventricular Pacing to Reduce Atrial Fibrillation in Sinus-Node Disease. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa071880
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.