Cited by 841Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studiesCardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmiasAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes

Long-term follow-up of patients from a randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing for sick-sinus syndrome

Andersen, Henning Rud, Nielsen, Jens Cosedis, Thomsen, Poul Erik Bloch, Thuesen, Leif, Mortensen, Peter Thomas, Vesterlund, Thomas, Pedersen, Anders Kirstein·1997·The Lancet

Abstract

Background In a previous study of 225 patients with sick-sinus syndrome randomised to either single-chamber atrial pacing (n=110) or single-chamber ventricular pacing (n=115), we found that after a mean follow-up of 3.3 years, atrial pacing was associated with significantly less atrial fibrillation and thromboembolism whereas there was no significant difference in mortality and heart failure between the two groups. We aimed to find out whether this beneficial effect of atrial pacing is maintained during extended follow-up of up to 8 years.Methods Follow-up visits for all patients were at 3 months, 12 months, then once a year at which patients had a physical examination, ECG recording, and pacemaker check-up. Endpoints were mortality, cardiovascular death, atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic events, heart failure, and atrioventricular block. Data was analysed on Dec 31, 1996.Findings At long-term follow-up, 39 patients from the atrial group had died versus 57 from the ventricular group (relative risk 0.66 [95% CI 0.44-0.99]; p=0.045). 19 patients from the atrial group and 39 patients from the ventricular group died from a cardiovascular cause (0.47 [0.27-0.82]; p=0.0065). The cumulative incidences of atrial fibrillation and chronic atrial fibrillation were also significantly lower in the atrial group than in the ventricular group (0.54 [0.33-0.89], p=0.012 and 0.35 [0.16-0.76], p=0.004, respectively). Thromboembolic events occurred in 13 patients in the atrial group and 26 in the ventricular group (0.47 [0.24-0.92], p=0.023). Heart failure was less severe in the atrial group than in the ventricular group (p<0.05). In multivariate analysis, atrial pacing was significantly associated with freedom from thromboembolic events (0.47 [0.24-0.92], p=0.028) and survival from cardiovascular death (0.52 [0.30-0.91], p=0.022), but no longer with overall survival (0.71 [0.46-1.08], p=0.11) or chronic atrial fibrillation (0.45 [0.20-1.05], p=0.063). Atrioventricular block occurred in four patients in the atrial group (0.6% annual risk).Interpretation The beneficial effect of atrial pacing found in our previous study is enhanced substantially over time. Patients with sick-sinus syndrome should be treated with an atrial rather than ventricular-pacing system because after long-term follow-up, atrial pacing is associated with a significantly higher survival, less atrial fibrillation, fewer thromboembolic complications, less heart failure, and a low-risk of atrioventricular block.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(97)03425-9

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In selected patients with sick sinus syndrome and fast ventricular response during AF paroxysms requiring rate control therapy, the addition of a pacemaker optimizes rate control and may help to control rhythm.

    “In selected patients with sick sinus syndrome and fast ventricular response during AF paroxysms requiring rate control therapy, the addition of a pacemaker not only optimizes rate control but may also help to control rhythm.711,712”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andersen, H. R., Nielsen, J. C., Thomsen, P. E. B., Thuesen, L., Mortensen, P. T., Vesterlund, T., & Pedersen, A. K.
Affiliations
Aarhus University Hospital (DK)
Corresponding author
Andersen, Henning Rud
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1997-10
Volume
350
Issue
9086
Pages
1210-1216
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2110807802
Cited by
841
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 25 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 26 · 2012: 33
FWCI
24.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Hjerteforeningen
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac pacing and defibrillation studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Atrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Keywords
sick sinus syndrome, atrial pacing, ventricular pacing, single-chamber pacemaker, atrial fibrillation, thromboembolism, cardiovascular mortality, heart failure, atrioventricular block, long-term outcomes, pacemaker implantation, atrioventricular conduction disorders, atrial tachyarrhythmia, atrial fibrillation prevention
MeSH terms
Aged, Atrial Fibrillation, Cardiac Pacing, Artificial, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Heart Block, Heart Failure, Humans, Male, Morbidity, Pacemaker, Artificial, Risk Factors, Sick Sinus Syndrome, Thromboembolism, Time Factors, Survival Rate, Multivariate Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review