Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early Use of TIPS in Patients with Cirrhosis and Variceal Bleeding

Open access
García-Pagán, Juan Carlos, Caca, Karel, Bureau, Christophe, Laleman, Wim, Appenrodt, Beate, Luca, Angelo, Abraldes, Juan G., Nevens, Frederik, Vinel, Jean Pierre, Mössner, Joachim, Bosch, Jaime·2010·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with cirrhosis in Child-Pugh class C or those in class B who have persistent bleeding at endoscopy are at high risk for treatment failure and a poor prognosis, even if they have undergone rescue treatment with a transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS). This study evaluated the earlier use of TIPS in such patients. METHODS: We randomly assigned, within 24 hours after admission, a total of 63 patients with cirrhosis and acute variceal bleeding who had been treated with vasoactive drugs plus endoscopic therapy to treatment with a polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent within 72 hours after randomization (early-TIPS group, 32 patients) or continuation of vasoactive-drug therapy, followed after 3 to 5 days by treatment with propranolol or nadolol and long-term endoscopic band ligation (EBL), with insertion of a TIPS if needed as rescue therapy (pharmacotherapy-EBL group, 31 patients). RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 16 months, rebleeding or failure to control bleeding occurred in 14 patients in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group as compared with 1 patient in the early-TIPS group (P=0.001). The 1-year actuarial probability of remaining free of this composite end point was 50% in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group versus 97% in the early-TIPS group (P<0.001). Sixteen patients died (12 in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group and 4 in the early-TIPS group, P=0.01). The 1-year actuarial survival was 61% in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group versus 86% in the early-TIPS group (P<0.001). Seven patients in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group received TIPS as rescue therapy, but four died. The number of days in the intensive care unit and the percentage of time in the hospital during follow-up were significantly higher in the pharmacotherapy-EBL group than in the early-TIPS group. No significant differences were observed between the two treatment groups with respect to serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In these patients with cirrhosis who were hospitalized for acute variceal bleeding and at high risk for treatment failure, the early use of TIPS was associated with significant reductions in treatment failure and in mortality. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN58150114.)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa0910102

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 20 references

Cited by

See all 1,244

Metadata

Authors
García-Pagán, J. C., Caca, K., Bureau, C., Laleman, W., Appenrodt, B., Luca, A., Abraldes, J. G., Nevens, F., Vinel, J. P., Mössner, J., & Bosch, J.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2010-06-24
Volume
362
Issue
25
Pages
2370-2379
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2134599653
Cited by
1,244
References
20
FWCI
35.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early Use of TIPS in Patients with Cirrhosis and Variceal Bleeding. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa0910102
The paper
García-Pagán, J. C., Caca, K., Bureau, C., Laleman, W., Appenrodt, B., Luca, A., Abraldes, J. G., Nevens, F., Vinel, J. P., Mössner, J., & Bosch, J. (2010). Early Use of TIPS in Patients with Cirrhosis and Variceal Bleeding. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa0910102

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.