CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,171Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsChronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 29 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lenalidomide plus Dexamethasone for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma

Open access
Mateos, María-Victoria, Hernández, Miguel-Teodoro, Giraldo, Pilar, de la Rubia, Javier, de Arriba, Felipe, Corral, Lucía López, Rosiñol, Laura, Paiva, Bruno, Palomera, Luis, Bargay, Joan, Oriol, Albert, Prosper, Felipe, López, Javier, Olavarría, Eduardo, Quintana, Nuria, García, José-Luis, Bladé, Joan, Lahuerta, Juan-José, San Miguel, Jesús-F.·2013·New England Journal of Medicine
DOI 10.1056/nejmoa1300439
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: For patients with smoldering multiple myeloma, the standard of care is observation until symptoms develop. However, this approach does not identify high-risk patients who may benefit from early intervention. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial, we randomly assigned 119 patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma to treatment or observation. Patients in the treatment group received an induction regimen (lenalidomide at a dose of 25 mg per day on days 1 to 21, plus dexamethasone at a dose of 20 mg per day on days 1 to 4 and days 12 to 15, at 4-week intervals for nine cycles), followed by a maintenance regimen (lenalidomide at a dose of 10 mg per day on days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle for 2 years). The primary end point was time to progression to symptomatic disease. Secondary end points were response rate, overall survival, and safety. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 40 months, the median time to progression was significantly longer in the treatment group than in the observation group (median not reached vs. 21 months; hazard ratio for progression, 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.09 to 0.32; P<0.001). The 3-year survival rate was also higher in the treatment group (94% vs. 80%; hazard ratio for death, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.10 to 0.91; P=0.03). A partial response or better was achieved in 79% of patients in the treatment group after the induction phase and in 90% during the maintenance phase. Toxic effects were mainly grade 2 or lower. CONCLUSIONS: Early treatment for patients with high-risk smoldering myeloma delays progression to active disease and increases overall survival. (Funded by Celgene; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00480363.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1300439

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 29 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 801–900 of 1,000

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Mateos, M.-V., Hernández, M.-T., Giraldo, P., de la Rubia, J., de Arriba, F., Corral, L. L., Rosiñol, L., Paiva, B., Palomera, L., Bargay, J., Oriol, A., Prosper, F., López, J., Olavarría, E., Quintana, N., García, J.-L., Bladé, J., Lahuerta, J.-J., & San Miguel, J.-F.
Affiliations
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (ES)
  • Universidad de Salamanca (ES)
ORCID
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Publisher
Massachusetts Medical Society
Published
2013-08
Volume
369
Issue
5
Pages
438-447
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
DOI
10.1056/nejmoa1300439
OpenAlex
W2144930991
Semantic Scholar
26670ff667b1b637856dff4325d13f38e1b7d641
Cited by
1,171
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 64 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 52 · 2018: 195 · 2017: 145 · 2016: 82 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 63 · 2013: 26
FWCI
54.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Hispana (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Gredos (University of Salamanca) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Research
Keywords
smoldering multiple myeloma, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, early treatment, time to progression, overall survival, maintenance therapy, induction therapy, high-risk myeloma
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Risk, Thalidomide, Survival Rate, Disease Progression, Induction Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review