Cited by 933Multiple Myeloma Research and TreatmentsBone health and treatmentsProtein Degradation and Inhibitors

Lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone versus lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone as initial therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: an open-label randomised controlled trial

Open access
Rajkumar, S Vincent, Jacobus, Susanna, Callander, Natalie S, Fonseca, Rafael, Vesole, David H, Williams, Michael E, Abonour, Rafat, Siegel, David S +2 more·2010·The Lancet Oncology

Abstract

Background High-dose dexamethasone is a mainstay of therapy for multiple myeloma. We studied whether low-dose dexamethasone in combination with lenalidomide is non-inferior to and has lower toxicity than high-dose dexamethasone plus lenalidomide.Methods Patients with untreated symptomatic myeloma were randomly assigned in this open-label non-inferiority trial to lenalidomide 25 mg on days 1-21 plus dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 of a 28-day cycle (high dose), or lenalidomide given on the same schedule with dexamethasone 40 mg on days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of a 28-day cycle (low dose). After four cycles, patients could discontinue therapy to pursue stem-cell transplantation or continue treatment until disease progression. The primary endpoint was response rate after four cycles assessed with European Group for Blood and Bone Marrow Transplant criteria. The non-inferiority margin was an absolute difference of 15% in response rate. Analysis was by modified intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00098475.Findings 445 patients were randomly assigned: 223 to high-dose and 222 to low-dose regimens. 169 (79%) of 214 patients receiving high-dose therapy and 142 (68%) of 205 patients on low-dose therapy had complete or partial response within four cycles (odds ratio 1.75, 80% CI 1.30-2.32; p=0.008). However, at the second interim analysis at 1 year, overall survival was 96% (95% CI 94-99) in the low-dose dexamethasone group compared with 87% (82-92) in the high-dose group (p=0.0002). As a result, the trial was stopped and patients on high-dose therapy were crossed over to low-dose therapy. 117 patients (52%) on the high-dose regimen had grade three or worse toxic effects in the first 4 months, compared with 76 (35%) of the 220 on the low-dose regimen for whom toxicity data were available (p=0.0001), 12 of 222 on high dose and one of 220 on low-dose dexamethasone died in the first 4 months (p=0.003). The three most common grade three or higher toxicities were deep-vein thrombosis, 57 (26%) of 223 versus 27 (12%) of 220 (p=0.0003); infections including pneumonia, 35 (16%) of 223 versus 20 (9%) of 220 (p=0.04), and fatigue 33 (15%) of 223 versus 20 (9%) of 220 (p=0.08), respectively.Interpretation Lenalidomide plus low-dose dexamethasone is associated with better short-term overall survival and with lower toxicity than lenalidomide plus high-dose dexamethasone in patients with newly diagnosed myeloma.Funding National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s1470-2045(09)70284-0

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Low-dose dexamethasone (once weekly 40 mg dose) is associated with less dexamethasone-related toxicity than more intensive dosing scheme without compromising efficacy.

    “Low-dose dexamethasone (i.e., once weekly 40 mg dose) is associated with less dexamethasone-related toxicity than more intensive dosing scheme without compromising efficacy [48].”

    From Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma (2021) · cites this paper as [48]

    The Methods (Procedures; page unavailable) specify 40 mg dexamethasone once weekly in the low-dose arm. The Results and Discussion report less toxicity and no worse progression or survival outcomes with low-dose treatment, but the Results also find a significantly lower response rate after four cycles (68.3% versus 79%). Thus, “without compromising efficacy” is too broad, and the evidence is limited to treatment with lenalidomide in newly diagnosed myeloma. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • In an ECOG randomized trial, low-dose dexamethasone was associated with better overall survival and significantly less toxicity.

    “In a randomized trial conducted by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG), the low-dose dexamethasone approach was associated with superior OS and significantly lower toxicity.110”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rajkumar, S. V., Jacobus, S., Callander, N. S., Fonseca, R., Vesole, D. H., Williams, M. E., Abonour, R., Siegel, D. S., Katz, M., & Greipp, P. R.
Affiliations
  • Mayo Clinic (US)
  • Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US)
  • University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
  • Saint Vincent's Catholic Medical Center (US)
  • University of Virginia Health System (US)
  • Indiana University Health (US)
  • Hackensack University Medical Center (US)
  • International Myeloma Foundation (US)
Corresponding author
Rajkumar, S Vincent
Venue
The Lancet Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
29-37
ISSN
1470-2045 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2169336006
Cited by
933
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 48 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 56 · 2015: 66 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 109 · 2012: 103
FWCI
61.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2010-01-01)
Open access
Locations
  • The Lancet Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Cancer Institute (U10CA066636, CA-23318, CA13650, R01CA093842, CA66636, U10CA013650, CA 93842, U10CA023318, U10CA021115, CA 21115)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Multiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Bone health and treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Degradation and Inhibitors
Keywords
multiple myeloma, lenalidomide, dexamethasone, high-dose dexamethasone, low-dose dexamethasone, initial treatment, non-inferiority, overall survival, response rate, treatment toxicity, stem cell transplantation
MeSH terms
Lenalidomide, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Dexamethasone, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Myeloma, Thalidomide, Time Factors, Proportional Hazards Models, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Early Termination of Clinical Trials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review