Cited by 366Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchSleep and related disordersRespiratory Support and Mechanisms

CPAP versus Oxygen in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Open access
Gottlieb, Daniel J., Punjabi, Naresh M., Mehra, Reena, Patel, Sanjay R., Quan, Stuart F., Babineau, Denise C., Tracy, Russell P., Rueschman, Michael +4 more·2014·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with hypertension, inflammation, and increased cardiovascular risk. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) reduces blood pressure, but adherence is often suboptimal, and the benefit beyond management of conventional risk factors is uncertain. Since intermittent hypoxemia may underlie cardiovascular sequelae of sleep apnea, we evaluated the effects of nocturnal supplemental oxygen and CPAP on markers of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: We conducted a randomized, controlled trial in which patients with cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors were recruited from cardiology practices. Patients were screened for obstructive sleep apnea with the use of the Berlin questionnaire, and home sleep testing was used to establish the diagnosis. Participants with an apnea-hypopnea index of 15 to 50 events per hour were randomly assigned to receive education on sleep hygiene and healthy lifestyle alone (the control group) or, in addition to education, either CPAP or nocturnal supplemental oxygen. Cardiovascular risk was assessed at baseline and after 12 weeks of the study treatment. The primary outcome was 24-hour mean arterial pressure. RESULTS: Of 318 patients who underwent randomization, 281 (88%) could be evaluated for ambulatory blood pressure at both baseline and follow-up. On average, the 24-hour mean arterial pressure at 12 weeks was lower in the group receiving CPAP than in the control group (-2.4 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -4.7 to -0.1; P=0.04) or the group receiving supplemental oxygen (-2.8 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.1 to -0.5; P=0.02). There was no significant difference in the 24-hour mean arterial pressure between the control group and the group receiving oxygen. A sensitivity analysis performed with the use of multiple imputation approaches to assess the effect of missing data did not change the results of the primary analysis. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with cardiovascular disease or multiple cardiovascular risk factors, the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea with CPAP, but not nocturnal supplemental oxygen, resulted in a significant reduction in blood pressure. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and others; HeartBEAT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01086800 .).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1306766

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottlieb, D. J., Punjabi, N. M., Mehra, R., Patel, S. R., Quan, S. F., Babineau, D. C., Tracy, R. P., Rueschman, M., Blumenthal, R. S., Lewis, E. F., Bhatt, D. L., & Redline, S.
Affiliations
  • Boston University (US)
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Cleveland Clinic (US)
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • Case Western Reserve University (US)
  • University of Vermont (US)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2014-06-12
Volume
370
Issue
24
Pages
2276-2285
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2132646664
Cited by
366
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 33 · 2017: 31 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 1
FWCI
28.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001079, UL1TR000439)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R21HL108226, R01HL109493, RC2HL101417)
  • National Center for Research Resources (UL1RR024989)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
Keywords
obstructive sleep apnea, continuous positive airway pressure, blood pressure, cardiovascular risk, ambulatory blood pressure, intermittent hypoxemia, cardiovascular disease, hypertension, home sleep testing, Berlin questionnaire
MeSH terms
Aged, Hypoxia, Blood Pressure, Cardiovascular Diseases, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Oxygen Inhalation Therapy, Risk Factors, Sleep, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review