The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Mortality after Adenoma Removal
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Although colonoscopic surveillance of patients after removal of adenomas is widely promoted, little is known about colorectal-cancer mortality among these patients. METHODS: Using the linkage of the Cancer Registry and the Cause of Death Registry of Norway, we estimated colorectal-cancer mortality among patients who had undergone removal of colorectal adenomas during the period from 1993 through 2007. Patients were followed through 2011. We calculated standardized incidence-based mortality ratios (SMRs) using rates for the Norwegian population at large for comparison. Norwegian guidelines recommended colonoscopy after 10 years for patients with high-risk adenomas (adenomas with high-grade dysplasia, a villous component, or a size ≥10 mm) and after 5 years for patients with three or more adenomas; no surveillance was recommended for patients with low-risk adenomas. Polyp size and exact number were not available in the registry. We defined high-risk adenomas as multiple adenomas and adenomas with a villous component or high-grade dysplasia. RESULTS: We identified 40,826 patients who had had colorectal adenomas removed. During a median follow-up of 7.7 years (maximum, 19.0), 1273 patients were given a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. A total of 398 deaths from colorectal cancer were expected and 383 were observed, for an SMR of 0.96 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.06) among patients who had had adenomas removed. Colorectal-cancer mortality was increased among patients with high-risk adenomas (expected deaths, 209; observed deaths, 242; SMR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.31), but it was reduced among patients with low-risk adenomas (expected deaths, 189; observed deaths, 141; SMR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: After a median of 7.7 years of follow-up, colorectal-cancer mortality was lower among patients who had had low-risk adenomas removed and moderately higher among those who had had high-risk adenomas removed, as compared with the general population. (Funded by the Norwegian Cancer Society and others.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Long-term colorectal-cancer incidence and mortality after lower endoscopy
Nishihara, R., Wu, K., Lochhead, P., Morikawa, T., Liao, X., Qian, Z. R., Inamura, K., Kim, S. A., Kuchiba, A., Yamauchi, M., et al. (2013) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1301969 · Cited by 1,483
Larsen, I. K., Småstuen, M., Johannesen, T. B., Langmark, F., Parkin, D. M., Bray, F., & Møller, B. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037 · Cited by 848
Research works printed but not linked: 19
- 10.1056/NEJMe1114639 · doi:10.1056/nejme1114639
- 10.1093/annonc/mdt157 · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1300720 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM199312303292701 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1100370 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM199203053261002 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300295 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ijc.20241 · doi:10.1002/ijc.20241
- 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.06.001 · DOI · Paper page
- Atkin, WS, Valori, R, Kuipers, EJ, European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis: first edition — colonoscopic surveillance following adenoma removal. Endoscopy2012;44:Suppl 3:SE151-SE163. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1055/s-0033-1344548 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.gie.2005.06.037 · DOI
- 10.1002/ijc.10254 · DOI
- 10.3109/00365529609051989 · doi:10.3109/00365529609051989
- 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2011.02631.x · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJMoa1000727 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19990330)18:6<695::AID-SIM60>3.0.CO;2-O · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/aos/1176350951 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1056/NEJM198506203122504 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Global cancer in women: burden and trends.
Torre, L. A., Islami, F., Siegel, R. L., Ward, E. M., & Jemal, A. (2017) · Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention · doi:10.1158/1055-9965.epi-16-0858 · Cited by 1,245
Rutter, M. D., East, J., Rees, C. J., Cripps, N., Docherty, J., Dolwani, S., Kaye, P. V., Monahan, K. J., Novelli, M. R., Plumb, A., et al. (2020) · Gut · doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858 · Cited by 380
Gupta, S., Lieberman, D., Anderson, J. C., Burke, C. A., Dominitz, J. A., Kaltenbach, T., Robertson, D. J., Shaukat, A., Syngal, S., & Rex, D. K. (2020) · American Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.14309/ajg.0000000000000544 · Cited by 343
Gupta, S., Lieberman, D., Anderson, J. C., Burke, C. A., Dominitz, J. A., Kaltenbach, T., Robertson, D. J., Shaukat, A., Syngal, S., & Rex, D. K. (2020) · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · doi:10.1016/j.gie.2020.01.014 · Cited by 325
Metadata
- Authors
- Løberg, M., Kalager, M., Holme, Ø., Hoff, G., Adami, H.-O., & Bretthauer, M.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2014-08-28
- Volume
- 371
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 799-807
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2138141964
- Cited by
- 345
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 12.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Mortality after Adenoma Removal. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1315870
- The paper
- Løberg, M., Kalager, M., Holme, Ø., Hoff, G., Adami, H.-O., & Bretthauer, M. (2014). Long-Term Colorectal-Cancer Mortality after Adenoma Removal. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1315870
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.