The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Oral Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effect of Mepolizumab in Eosinophilic Asthma
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Many patients with severe asthma require regular treatment with oral glucocorticoids despite the use of high-dose inhaled therapy. However, the regular use of systemic glucocorticoids can result in serious and often irreversible adverse effects. Mepolizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to and inactivates interleukin-5, has been shown to reduce asthma exacerbations in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma. METHODS: In a randomized, double-blind trial involving 135 patients with severe eosinophilic asthma, we compared the glucocorticoid-sparing effect of mepolizumab (at a dose of 100 mg) with that of placebo administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 20 weeks. The primary outcome was the degree of reduction in the glucocorticoid dose (90 to 100% reduction, 75 to less than 90% reduction, 50 to less than 75% reduction, more than 0 to less than 50% reduction, or no decrease in oral glucocorticoid dose, a lack of asthma control during weeks 20 to 24, or withdrawal from treatment). Other outcomes included the rate of asthma exacerbations, asthma control, and safety. RESULTS: The likelihood of a reduction in the glucocorticoid-dose stratum was 2.39 times greater in the mepolizumab group than in the placebo group (95% confidence interval, 1.25 to 4.56; P=0.008). The median percentage reduction from baseline in the glucocorticoid dose was 50% in the mepolizumab group, as compared with no reduction in the placebo group (P=0.007). Despite receiving a reduced glucocorticoid dose, patients in the mepolizumab group, as compared with those in the placebo group, had a relative reduction of 32% in the annualized rate of exacerbations (1.44 vs. 2.12, P=0.04) and a reduction of 0.52 points with respect to asthma symptoms (P=0.004), as measured on the Asthma Control Questionnaire 5 (in which the minimal clinically important difference is 0.5 points). The safety profile of mepolizumab was similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients requiring daily oral glucocorticoid therapy to maintain asthma control, mepolizumab had a significant glucocorticoid-sparing effect, reduced exacerbations, and improved control of asthma symptoms. (Funded by GlaxoSmithKline; SIRIUS ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01691508.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Miller, M. R., Hankinson, J., Brusasco, V., Burgos, F., Casaburi, R., Coates, A., Crapo, R., Enright, P., van der Grinten, C. P. M., Gustafsson, P., et al. (2005) · European Respiratory Journal · doi:10.1183/09031936.05.00034805 · Cited by 15,627
Jones, P. W., Quirk, F. H., Baveystock, C. M., & Littlejohns, P. (1992) · American Review of Respiratory Disease · doi:10.1164/ajrccm/145.6.1321 · Cited by 3,035
Sample size calculations for ordered categorical data
Whitehead, J. (1993) · Statistics in Medicine · doi:10.1002/sim.4780122404 · Cited by 297
Cited by
Lambrecht, B. N., & Hammad, H. (2015) · Nature Immunology · doi:10.1038/ni.3049 · Cited by 1,673
After asthma: redefining airways diseases
Pavord, I. D., Beasley, R., Agusti, A., Anderson, G. P., Bel, E., Brusselle, G., Cullinan, P., Custovic, A., Ducharme, F. M., Fahy, J. V., et al. (2018) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)30879-6 · Cited by 1,073
Self-citationTezepelumab in Adults with Uncontrolled Asthma
Corren, J., Parnes, J. R., Wang, L., Mo, M., Roseti, S. L., Griffiths, J. M., & van der Merwe, R. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1704064 · Cited by 965
Asthma Exacerbations: Pathogenesis, Prevention, and Treatment
Castillo, J. R., Peters, S. P., & Busse, W. W. (2017) · The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice · doi:10.1016/j.jaip.2017.05.001 · Cited by 544
Groh, M., Pagnoux, C., Baldini, C., Bel, E., Bottero, P., Cottin, V., Dalhoff, K., Dunogué, B., Gross, W., Holle, J., et al. (2015) · European Journal of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ejim.2015.04.022 · Cited by 476
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Bel, E. H., Wenzel, S. E., Thompson, P. J., Prazma, C. M., Keene, O. N., Yancey, S. W., Ortega, H. G., & Pavord, I. D.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2014-09-25
- Volume
- 371
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 1189-1197
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2075699130
- Cited by
- 1,661
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 79.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Oral Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effect of Mepolizumab in Eosinophilic Asthma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1403291
- The paper
- Bel, E. H., Wenzel, S. E., Thompson, P. J., Prazma, C. M., Keene, O. N., Yancey, S. W., Ortega, H. G., & Pavord, I. D. (2014). Oral Glucocorticoid-Sparing Effect of Mepolizumab in Eosinophilic Asthma. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1403291
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.