Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,783

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia

Open access
Zeisler, Harald, Llurba, Elisa, Chantraine, Frederic, Vatish, Manu, Staff, Anne Cathrine, Sennström, Maria, Olovsson, Matts, Brennecke, Shaun P., Stepan, Holger, Allegranza, Deirdre, Dilba, Peter, Schoedl, Maria, Hund, Martin, Verlohren, Stefan·2016·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase 1 (sFlt-1) to placental growth factor (PlGF) is elevated in pregnant women before the clinical onset of preeclampsia, but its predictive value in women with suspected preeclampsia is unclear. METHODS: We performed a prospective, multicenter, observational study to derive and validate a ratio of serum sFlt-1 to PlGF that would be predictive of the absence or presence of preeclampsia in the short term in women with singleton pregnancies in whom preeclampsia was suspected (24 weeks 0 days to 36 weeks 6 days of gestation). Primary objectives were to assess whether low sFlt-1:PlGF ratios (at or below a derived cutoff) predict the absence of preeclampsia within 1 week after the first visit and whether high ratios (above the cutoff) predict the presence of preeclampsia within 4 weeks. RESULTS: In the development cohort (500 women), we identified an sFlt-1:PlGF ratio cutoff of 38 as having important predictive value. In a subsequent validation study among an additional 550 women, an sFlt-1:PlGF ratio of 38 or lower had a negative predictive value (i.e., no preeclampsia in the subsequent week) of 99.3% (95% confidence interval [CI], 97.9 to 99.9), with 80.0% sensitivity (95% CI, 51.9 to 95.7) and 78.3% specificity (95% CI, 74.6 to 81.7). The positive predictive value of an sFlt-1:PlGF ratio above 38 for a diagnosis of preeclampsia within 4 weeks was 36.7% (95% CI, 28.4 to 45.7), with 66.2% sensitivity (95% CI, 54.0 to 77.0) and 83.1% specificity (95% CI, 79.4 to 86.3). CONCLUSIONS: An sFlt-1:PlGF ratio of 38 or lower can be used to predict the short-term absence of preeclampsia in women in whom the syndrome is suspected clinically. (Funded by Roche Diagnostics.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1414838

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,783

Metadata

Authors
Zeisler, H., Llurba, E., Chantraine, F., Vatish, M., Staff, A. C., Sennström, M., Olovsson, M., Brennecke, S. P., Stepan, H., Allegranza, D., Dilba, P., Schoedl, M., Hund, M., & Verlohren, S.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2016-01-07
Volume
374
Issue
1
Pages
13-22
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2233974801
Cited by
1,783
References
5
FWCI
187.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1414838
The paper
Zeisler, H., Llurba, E., Chantraine, F., Vatish, M., Staff, A. C., Sennström, M., Olovsson, M., Brennecke, S. P., Stepan, H., Allegranza, D., Dilba, P., Schoedl, M., Hund, M., & Verlohren, S. (2016). Predictive Value of the sFlt-1:PlGF Ratio in Women with Suspected Preeclampsia. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1414838

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.