The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether contemporary hormonal contraception is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer. METHODS: We assessed associations between the use of hormonal contraception and the risk of invasive breast cancer in a nationwide prospective cohort study involving all women in Denmark between 15 and 49 years of age who had not had cancer or venous thromboembolism and who had not received treatment for infertility. Nationwide registries provided individually updated information about the use of hormonal contraception, breast-cancer diagnoses, and potential confounders. RESULTS: Among 1.8 million women who were followed on average for 10.9 years (a total of 19.6 million person-years), 11,517 cases of breast cancer occurred. As compared with women who had never used hormonal contraception, the relative risk of breast cancer among all current and recent users of hormonal contraception was 1.20 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14 to 1.26). This risk increased from 1.09 (95% CI, 0.96 to 1.23) with less than 1 year of use to 1.38 (95% CI, 1.26 to 1.51) with more than 10 years of use (P=0.002). After discontinuation of hormonal contraception, the risk of breast cancer was still higher among the women who had used hormonal contraceptives for 5 years or more than among women who had not used hormonal contraceptives. Risk estimates associated with current or recent use of various oral combination (estrogen-progestin) contraceptives varied between 1.0 and 1.6. Women who currently or recently used the progestin-only intrauterine system also had a higher risk of breast cancer than women who had never used hormonal contraceptives (relative risk, 1.21; 95% CI, 1.11 to 1.33). The overall absolute increase in breast cancers diagnosed among current and recent users of any hormonal contraceptive was 13 (95% CI, 10 to 16) per 100,000 person-years, or approximately 1 extra breast cancer for every 7690 women using hormonal contraception for 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of breast cancer was higher among women who currently or recently used contemporary hormonal contraceptives than among women who had never used hormonal contraceptives, and this risk increased with longer durations of use; however, absolute increases in risk were small. (Funded by the Novo Nordisk Foundation.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Chlebowski, R. T., Hendrix, S. L., Langer, R. D., Stefanick, M. L., Gass, M., Lane, D., Rodabough, R. J., Gilligan, M. A., Cyr, M. G., Thomson, C. A., et al. (2003) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.289.24.3243 · Cited by 1,872
Menopausal Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk
Schairer, C. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.4.485 · Cited by 1,048
Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Breast Cancer Risk: Estrogen Versus Estrogen Plus Progestin
Ross, R. K. (2000) · Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/92.4.328 · Cited by 877
Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction with hormonal contraception
Lidegaard, Ø., Løkkegaard, E., Jensen, A., Skovlund, C. W., & Keiding, N. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1111840 · Cited by 607
Self-citationOral Contraceptives and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Marchbanks, P. A., McDonald, J. A., Wilson, H. G., Folger, S. G., Mandel, M. G., Daling, J. R., Bernstein, L., Malone, K. E., Ursin, G., Strom, B. L., et al. (2002) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa013202 · Cited by 532
Colditz, G. A. (2000) · American Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/aje/152.10.950 · Cited by 487
Breast Cancer after Use of Estrogen plus Progestin in Postmenopausal Women
Chlebowski, R. T., Kuller, L. H., Prentice, R. L., Stefanick, M. L., Manson, J. E., Gass, M., Aragaki, A. K., Ockene, J. K., Lane, D. S., Sarto, G. E., et al. (2009) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa0807684 · Cited by 472
Oral contraceptives and the risk of breast cancer*
(2003) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/00006250-200304000-00031 · Cited by 431
Hannaford, P. C., Selvaraj, S., Elliott, A. M., Angus, V., Iversen, L., & Lee, A. J. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39289.649410.55 · Cited by 337
Self-citation
Cited by
Harbeck, N., Penault-Llorca, F., Cortes, J., Gnant, M., Houssami, N., Poortmans, P., Ruddy, K., Tsang, J., & Cardoso, F. (2019) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/s41572-019-0111-2 · Cited by 3,024
Loibl, S., Poortmans, P., Morrow, M., Denkert, C., & Curigliano, G. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)32381-3 · Cited by 1,648
Key steps for effective breast cancer prevention
Britt, K. L., Cuzick, J., & Phillips, K.-A. (2020) · Nature Reviews Cancer · doi:10.1038/s41568-020-0266-x · Cited by 992
Breast Cancer—Epidemiology, Classification, Pathogenesis and Treatment (Review of Literature)
Smolarz, B., Nowak, A. Z., & Romanowicz, H. (2022) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers14102569 · Cited by 587
Estrogen replacement in Turner syndrome: literature review and practical considerations
Klein, K. O., Rosenfield, R. L., Santen, R. J., Gawlik, A. M., Backeljauw, P. F., Gravholt, C. H., Sas, T. C. J., & Mauras, N. (2018) · The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism · doi:10.1210/jc.2017-02183 · Cited by 151
Metadata
- Authors
- Mørch, L. S., Skovlund, C. W., Hannaford, P. C., Iversen, L., Fielding, S., & Lidegaard, Ø.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2017-12-07
- Volume
- 377
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 2228-2239
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W2775284533
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 36
- FWCI
- 22.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1700732
- The paper
- Mørch, L. S., Skovlund, C. W., Hannaford, P. C., Iversen, L., Fielding, S., & Lidegaard, Ø. (2017). Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1700732
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.