Cited by 607Reproductive Health and ContraceptionVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and ManagementBlood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms

Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction with hormonal contraception

Lidegaard, Øjvind, Løkkegaard, Ellen, Jensen, Aksel, Skovlund, Charlotte Wessel, Keiding, Niels·2012·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although several studies have assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism with newer hormonal contraception, few have examined thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, and results have been conflicting. METHODS: In this 15-year Danish historical cohort study, we followed nonpregnant women, 15 to 49 years old, with no history of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Data on use of hormonal contraception, clinical end points, and potential confounders were obtained from four national registries. RESULTS: A total of 1,626,158 women contributed 14,251,063 person-years of observation, during which 3311 thrombotic strokes (21.4 per 100,000 person-years) and 1725 myocardial infarctions (10.1 per 100,000 person-years) occurred. As compared with nonuse, current use of oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg was associated with the following relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, according to progestin type: norethindrone, 2.2 (1.5 to 3.2) and 2.3 (1.3 to 3.9); levonorgestrel, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.0) and 2.0 (1.6 to 2.5); norgestimate, 1.5 (1.2 to 1.9) and 1.3 (0.9 to 1.9); desogestrel, 2.2 (1.8 to 2.7) and 2.1 (1.5 to 2.8); gestodene, 1.8 (1.6 to 2.0) and 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3); and drospirenone, 1.6 (1.2 to 2.2) and 1.7 (1.0 to 2.6), respectively. With ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 20 μg, the corresponding relative risks according to progestin type were as follows: desogestrel, 1.5 (1.3 to 1.9) and 1.6 (1.1 to 2.1); gestodene, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.1) and 1.2 (0.8 to 1.9); and drospirenone, 0.9 (0.2 to 3.5) and 0.0. For transdermal patches, the corresponding relative risks were 3.2 (0.8 to 12.6) and 0.0, and for a vaginal ring, 2.5 (1.4 to 4.4) and 2.1 (0.7 to 6.5). CONCLUSIONS: Although the absolute risks of thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction associated with the use of hormonal contraception were low, the risk was increased by a factor of 0.9 to 1.7 with oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 20 μg and by a factor of 1.3 to 2.3 with those that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg, with relatively small differences in risk according to progestin type. (Funded by the Danish Heart Association.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1111840

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Estrogen is associated with increased risk of arterial thrombosis.

    “Estrogen has also been associated with increased risk of “unusual site” thromboses, as well as arterial thrombosis.”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

  • A study of more than a million women aged 15 to 49 by Lidegard et al showed an increased risk of stroke and myocardial infarction associated with use of CHC, estimated at a factor of 0.9 to 2.3 based on the estrogen dose and component.

    “In 2012, a study of more than a million women aged 15 to 49 by Lidegard et al showed an increased risk of stroke and myocardial infarction (MI) associated with use of CHC, estimated at a factor of 0.9 to 2.3 based on the estrogen dose and component.”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

  • Progestin-only methods such as oral pills, levonorgestrel IUD, and the progestin subdermal implant have not been shown to increase risk of VTE.

    “Options include the copper IUD and progestin-only methods such as oral pills, levonorgestrel IUD, and the progestin subdermal implant, may induce amenorrhea, and have not been shown increase risk of VTE (contrary to etonogestrel implant package labeling) [98].”

    From Estrogen and thrombosis: a bench to bedside review (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

  • The absolute risk of cardiovascular disease associated with the use of combined oral contraceptives is low (about 10 per 100 000 person years for myocardial infarction and 21 per 100 000 person years for stroke).

    “the absolute risk of cardiovascular disease associated with the use of combined oral contraceptives is low (about 10 per 100 000 person years for myocardial infarction and 21 per 100 000 person years for stroke)”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lidegaard, Ø., Løkkegaard, E., Jensen, A., Skovlund, C. W., & Keiding, N.
Affiliations
University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2012-06-14
Volume
366
Issue
24
Pages
2257-2266
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2146576387
Cited by
607
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 28 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 34 · 2019: 40 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 45 · 2016: 57 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 50 · 2013: 59 · 2012: 18
FWCI
54.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Reproductive Health and Contraception
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Internal Medicine › Venous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hematology › Blood Coagulation and Thrombosis Mechanisms
Keywords
thrombotic stroke, myocardial infarction, hormonal contraception, oral contraceptives, progestins, norethisterone, levonorgestrel, desogestrel, drospirenone, cardiovascular risk, women of reproductive age, venous thromboembolism, relative risk, confounding
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adolescent, Adult, Contraceptive Agents, Contraceptives, Oral, Combined, Educational Status, Estradiol, Female, Humans, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Progestins, Regression Analysis, Risk, Smoking, Thrombosis, Cohort Studies, Incidence, Stroke, Intracranial Thrombosis, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review