The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Menopausal Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk
Abstract
CONTEXT: Whether menopausal hormone replacement therapy using a combined estrogen-progestin regimen increases risk of breast cancer beyond that associated with estrogen alone is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether increases in risk associated with the estrogen-progestin regimen are greater than those associated with estrogen alone. DESIGN: Cohort study of follow-up data for 1980-1995 from the Breast Cancer Detection Demonstration Project, a nationwide breast cancer screening program. SETTING: Twenty-nine screening centers throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 46355 postmenopausal women (mean age at start of follow-up, 58 years). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Incident breast cancers by recency, duration, and type of hormone use. RESULTS: During follow-up, 2082 cases of breast cancer were identified. Increases in risk with estrogen only and estrogen-progestin only were restricted to use within the previous 4 years (relative risk [RR], 1.2 [95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-1.4] and 1.4 [95% CI, 1.1-1.8], respectively); the relative risk increased by 0.01 (95% CI, 0.002-0.03) with each year of estrogen-only use and by 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02-0.16) with each year of estrogen-progestin-only use among recent users, after adjustment for mammographic screening, age at menopause, body mass index (BMI), education, and age. The P value associated with the test of homogeneity of these estimates was .02. Among women with a BMI of 24.4 kg/m2 or less, increases in RR with each year of estrogen-only use and estrogen-progestin-only use among recent users were 0.03 (95% CI, 0.01-0.06) and 0.12 (95% CI, 0.02-0.25), respectively. These associations were evident for the majority of invasive tumors with ductal histology and regardless of extent of invasive disease. Risk in heavier women did not increase with use of estrogen only or estrogen-progestin only. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that the estrogen-progestin regimen increases breast cancer risk beyond that associated with estrogen alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Volume II – The Design and Analysis of Cohort Studies
Juul, S. (1989) · Scandinavian Journal of Social Medicine · doi:10.1177/140349488901700214 · Cited by 3,592
The use of estrogens and progestins and the risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
Colditz, G. A., Hankinson, S. E., Hunter, D. J., Willett, W. C., Manson, J. E., Stampfer, M. J., Hennekens, C., Rosner, B., & Speizer, F. E. (1995) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199506153322401 · Cited by 1,487
Risks of breast and endometrial cancer after estrogen and estrogen–progestin replacement
Persson, I., Weiderpass, E., Bergkvist, L., Bergström, R., & Schairer, C. (1999) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1023/a:1008909128110 · Cited by 258
Self-citationGapstur, S. M., Morrow, M., & Sellers, T. A. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.281.22.2091 · Cited by 231
Laidlaw, I. J. (1995) · Endocrinology · doi:10.1210/en.136.1.164 · Cited by 189
Breast cancer and hormone replacement therapy.
LaCroix, A. Z., & Burke, W. (1990) · PubMed · Cited by 155
Schairer, C., Byrne, C., Keyl, P. M., Brinton, L. A., Sturgeon, S. R., & Hoover, R. N. (1994) · Cancer Causes & Control · doi:10.1007/bf01831376 · Cited by 138
Self-citationEstrogen Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer Survival in a Large Screening Study
Schairer, C., Gail, M. H., Byrne, C., Rosenberg, P. S., Sturgeon, S. R., Brinton, L. A., & Hoover, R. N. (1999) · JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/91.3.264 · Cited by 124
Self-citationMenopausal estrogen use and risk of breast cancer
Brinton, L. A., Hoover, R. N., Szklo, M., & Fraumeni, J. F. (1981) · Cancer · Cited by 117
Role of 17β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in endocrine and intracrine estradiol biosynthesis
POUTANEN, M. H., ISOMAA, V. V., Peltoketo, H., & Vihko, R. (1995) · The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology · doi:10.1016/0960-0760(95)00201-4 · Cited by 104
Cited by
Writing Group for the Women's Health Initiative Investigators (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.288.3.321 · Cited by 15,889
Overweight, obesity and cancer: epidemiological evidence and proposed mechanisms
Calle, E. E., & Kaaks, R. (2004) · Nature reviews. Cancer · doi:10.1038/nrc1408 · Cited by 3,613
Cancer burden in the year 2000. The global picture
Parkin, D. M., Bray, F. I., & Devesa, S. S. (2001) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00267-2 · Cited by 2,169
The pros and cons of phytoestrogens
Patisaul, H. B., & Jefferson, W. (2010) · Frontiers in Neuroendocrinology · doi:10.1016/j.yfrne.2010.03.003 · Cited by 746
Contemporary Hormonal Contraception and the Risk of Breast Cancer
Mørch, L. S., Skovlund, C. W., Hannaford, P. C., Iversen, L., Fielding, S., & Lidegaard, Ø. (2017) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1700732 · Cited by 641
Metadata
- Authors
- Schairer, C.
- Venue
- JAMA
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2000-01-26
- Volume
- 283
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 485
- ISSN
- 0002-9955 (ISSN-L)
- 0098-7484
- OpenAlex
- W2064671008
- Cited by
- 1,048
- References
- 12
- FWCI
- 105.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Menopausal Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jama.283.4.485
- The paper
- Schairer, C. (2000). Menopausal Estrogen and Estrogen-Progestin Replacement Therapy and Breast Cancer Risk. JAMA. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.283.4.485
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.