Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 5,629

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct

Open access
Nogueira, Raul G., Jadhav, Ashutosh P., Haussen, Diogo C., Bonafe, Alain, Budzik, Ronald F., Bhuva, Parita, Yavagal, Dileep R., Ribo, Marc, Cognard, Christophe, Hanel, Ricardo A., Sila, Cathy A., Hassan, Ameer E., Millan, Monica, Levy, Elad I., Mitchell, Peter, Chen, Michael, English, Joey D., Shah, Qaisar A., Silver, Frank L., Pereira, Vitor M., Mehta, Brijesh P., Baxter, Blaise W., Abraham, Michael G., Cardona, Pedro, Veznedaroglu, Erol, Hellinger, Frank R., Feng, Lei, Kirmani, Jawad F., Lopes, Demetrius K., Jankowitz, Brian T., Frankel, Michael R., Costalat, Vincent, Vora, Nirav A., Yoo, Albert J., Malik, Amer M., Furlan, Anthony J., Rubiera, Marta, Aghaebrahim, Amin, Olivot, Jean-Marc, Tekle, Wondwossen G., Shields, Ryan, Graves, Todd, Lewis, Roger J., Smith, Wade S., Liebeskind, David S., Saver, Jeffrey L., Jovin, Tudor G.·2018·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The effect of endovascular thrombectomy that is performed more than 6 hours after the onset of ischemic stroke is uncertain. Patients with a clinical deficit that is disproportionately severe relative to the infarct volume may benefit from late thrombectomy. METHODS: We enrolled patients with occlusion of the intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery who had last been known to be well 6 to 24 hours earlier and who had a mismatch between the severity of the clinical deficit and the infarct volume, with mismatch criteria defined according to age (<80 years or ≥80 years). Patients were randomly assigned to thrombectomy plus standard care (the thrombectomy group) or to standard care alone (the control group). The coprimary end points were the mean score for disability on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale (which ranges from 0 [death] to 10 [no symptoms or disability]) and the rate of functional independence (a score of 0, 1, or 2 on the modified Rankin scale, which ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more severe disability) at 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 206 patients were enrolled; 107 were assigned to the thrombectomy group and 99 to the control group. At 31 months, enrollment in the trial was stopped because of the results of a prespecified interim analysis. The mean score on the utility-weighted modified Rankin scale at 90 days was 5.5 in the thrombectomy group as compared with 3.4 in the control group (adjusted difference [Bayesian analysis], 2.0 points; 95% credible interval, 1.1 to 3.0; posterior probability of superiority, >0.999), and the rate of functional independence at 90 days was 49% in the thrombectomy group as compared with 13% in the control group (adjusted difference, 33 percentage points; 95% credible interval, 24 to 44; posterior probability of superiority, >0.999). The rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage did not differ significantly between the two groups (6% in the thrombectomy group and 3% in the control group, P=0.50), nor did 90-day mortality (19% and 18%, respectively; P=1.00). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with acute stroke who had last been known to be well 6 to 24 hours earlier and who had a mismatch between clinical deficit and infarct, outcomes for disability at 90 days were better with thrombectomy plus standard care than with standard care alone. (Funded by Stryker Neurovascular; DAWN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02142283 .).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1706442

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 5,629

Metadata

Authors
Nogueira, R. G., Jadhav, A. P., Haussen, D. C., Bonafe, A., Budzik, R. F., Bhuva, P., Yavagal, D. R., Ribo, M., Cognard, C., Hanel, R. A., Sila, C. A., Hassan, A. E., Millan, M., Levy, E. I., Mitchell, P., Chen, M., English, J. D., Shah, Q. A., Silver, F. L., Pereira, V. M., Mehta, B. P., Baxter, B. W., Abraham, M. G., Cardona, P., Veznedaroglu, E., Hellinger, F. R., Feng, L., Kirmani, J. F., Lopes, D. K., Jankowitz, B. T., Frankel, M. R., Costalat, V., Vora, N. A., Yoo, A. J., Malik, A. M., Furlan, A. J., Rubiera, M., Aghaebrahim, A., Olivot, J.-M., Tekle, W. G., Shields, R., Graves, T., Lewis, R. J., Smith, W. S., Liebeskind, D. S., Saver, J. L., & Jovin, T. G.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2018-01-04
Volume
378
Issue
1
Pages
11-21
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2767776410
Cited by
5,629
References
1
FWCI
348.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa1706442
The paper
Nogueira, R. G., Jadhav, A. P., Haussen, D. C., Bonafe, A., Budzik, R. F., Bhuva, P., Yavagal, D. R., Ribo, M., Cognard, C., Hanel, R. A., Sila, C. A., Hassan, A. E., Millan, M., Levy, E. I., Mitchell, P., Chen, M., English, J. D., Shah, Q. A., Silver, F. L., . . . Jovin, T. G. (2018). Thrombectomy 6 to 24 Hours after Stroke with a Mismatch between Deficit and Infarct. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa1706442

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.