Cited by 657Asthma and respiratory diseasesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) ResearchOccupational exposure and asthma

Budesonide/Formoterol Combination Therapy as Both Maintenance and Reliever Medication in Asthma

O'Byrne, Paul M., Bisgaard, Hans, Godard, Philippe P., Pistolesi, Massimo, Palmqvist, Mona, Zhu, Yuanjue, Ekström, Tommy, Bateman, Eric D.·2005·American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

Abstract

Asthma control is improved by combining inhaled corticosteroids with long-acting β2-agonists. However, fluctuating asthma control still occurs. We hypothesized that in patients receiving low maintenance dose budesonide/formoterol (bud/form), replacing short-acting β2-agonist (SABA) reliever with as-needed bud/form would provide rapid symptom relief and simultaneous adjustment in antiinflammatory therapy, thereby reducing exacerbations. In this double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study, 2,760 patients with asthma aged 4–80 years (FEV1 60–100% predicted) received either terbutaline 0.4 mg as SABA with bud/form 80/4.5 μg twice a day (bud/form + SABA) or bud 320 μg twice a day (bud + SABA) or bud/form 80/4.5 μg twice a day with 80/4.5 μg as-needed (bud/form maintenance + relief). Children used a once-nocte maintenance dose. Bud/form maintenance + relief prolonged time to first severe exacerbation (p < 0.001; primary endpoint), resulting in a 45–47% lower exacerbation risk versus bud/form + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.55; 95% confidence interval, 0.44, 0.67) or bud + SABA (hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval 0.43, 0.65). Bud/form maintenance + relief also prolonged the time to the first, second, and third exacerbation requiring medical intervention (p < 0.001), reduced severe exacerbation rate, and improved symptoms, awakenings, and lung function compared with both fixed dosing regimens.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1164/rccm.200407-884oc

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The pandemic 2009 H1N1 influenza virus is extremely sensitive to the antiviral actions of type I and type III IFNs.

    “The pandemic 2009 (H1N1) influenza virus is extremely sensitive to the antiviral actions of type I and type III IFNs (200).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
O'Byrne, P. M., Bisgaard, H., Godard, P. P., Pistolesi, M., Palmqvist, M., Zhu, Y., Ekström, T., & Bateman, E. D.
Affiliations
  • Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Hospital, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada; COPSAC Clinical Research Unit, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Gentofte, Denmark; Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Service des Maladies Respiratoires and Bronchomotricité, Montpellier, France; Department of Critical Care, Section of Respiratory Medicine, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Respiratory Department, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China; AstraZeneca R&D, Lund, Sweden; and University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
  • University of Copenhagen (DK)
Venue
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Published
2005-01
Volume
171
Issue
2
Pages
129-136
ISSN
  • 1073-449X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-4970
OpenAlex
W2110658984
Cited by
657
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 31 · 2021: 27 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 20 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 27
FWCI
30.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational exposure and asthma
Keywords
budesonide/formoterol, asthma, maintenance and reliever therapy, inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting beta2-agonists, terbutaline, asthma exacerbations, asthma control, lung function, nocturnal symptoms
MeSH terms
Formoterol Fumarate, Adolescent, Adrenergic beta-Agonists, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anti-Inflammatory Agents, Asthma, Child, Child, Preschool, Double-Blind Method, Drug Combinations, Ethanolamines, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Peak Expiratory Flow Rate, Regression Analysis, Safety, Proportional Hazards Models, Budesonide, Metered Dose Inhalers

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review