Cited by 816Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular DiseasesCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsAcute Myocardial Infarction Research

Ticagrelor or prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes

Open access
Schüpke, Stefanie, Neumann, Franz-Josef, Menichelli, Maurizio, Mayer, Katharina, Bernlochner, Isabell, Wöhrle, Jochen, Richardt, Gert, Liebetrau, Christoph +34 more·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The relative merits of ticagrelor as compared with prasugrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes for whom invasive evaluation is planned are uncertain. METHODS: In this multicenter, randomized, open-label trial, we randomly assigned patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes and for whom invasive evaluation was planned to receive either ticagrelor or prasugrel. The primary end point was the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke at 1 year. A major secondary end point (the safety end point) was bleeding. RESULTS: A total of 4018 patients underwent randomization. A primary end-point event occurred in 184 of 2012 patients (9.3%) in the ticagrelor group and in 137 of 2006 patients (6.9%) in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.70; P = 0.006). The respective incidences of the individual components of the primary end point in the ticagrelor group and the prasugrel group were as follows: death, 4.5% and 3.7%; myocardial infarction, 4.8% and 3.0%; and stroke, 1.1% and 1.0%. Definite or probable stent thrombosis occurred in 1.3% of patients assigned to ticagrelor and 1.0% of patients assigned to prasugrel, and definite stent thrombosis occurred in 1.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Major bleeding (as defined by the Bleeding Academic Research Consortium scale) was observed in 5.4% of patients in the ticagrelor group and in 4.8% of patients in the prasugrel group (hazard ratio, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.83 to 1.51; P = 0.46). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients who presented with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation, the incidence of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke was significantly lower among those who received prasugrel than among those who received ticagrelor, and the incidence of major bleeding was not significantly different between the two groups. (Funded by the German Center for Cardiovascular Research and Deutsches Herzzentrum München; ISAR-REACT 5 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01944800.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1908973

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The open-label ISAR-REACT 5 trial randomized 4018 patients with acute coronary syndrome to prasugrel or ticagrelor added to acetylsalicylic acid.

    “The open-label ISAR-REACT 5 (Intracoronary Stenting and Antithrombotic Regimen: Rapid Early Action for Coronary Treatment) trial randomized 4018 patients with ACS to prasugrel or ticagrelor added to ASA.”
  • Prasugrel was superior to ticagrelor in reducing MACE without increasing major bleeding, with similar effects in the sub-group of patients with diabetes (n = 892; 22%).

    “Prasugrel was superior to ticagrelor in reducing MACE without increasing major bleeding, with similar effects in the sub-group of patients with diabetes (n = 892; 22%; Supplementary data online, Table S12).313”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schüpke, S., Neumann, F.-J., Menichelli, M., Mayer, K., Bernlochner, I., Wöhrle, J., Richardt, G., Liebetrau, C., Witzenbichler, B., Antoniucci, D., Akin, I., Bott-Flügel, L., Fischer, M., Landmesser, U., Katus, H. A., Sibbing, D., Seyfarth, M., Janisch, M., Boncompagni, D., Hilz, R., Rottbauer, W., Okrojek, R., Möllmann, H., Hochholzer, W., Migliorini, A., Cassese, S., Mollo, P., Xhepa, E., Kufner, S., Strehle, A., Leggewie, S., Allali, A., Ndrepepa, G., Schühlen, H., Angiolillo, D. J., Hamm, C. W., Hapfelmeier, A., Tölg, R., Trenk, D., Schunkert, H., Laugwitz, K.-L., & Kastrati, A.
Affiliations
  • German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DE)
  • From the Department of Cardiology, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, and Technische Universität München (S.S., K.M., M.J., R.H., S.C., E.X., S.K., G.N., H. Schunkert, A.K.), the German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Partner Site Munich Heart Alliance (S.S., D.S., H. Schunkert, K.-L.L., A.K.), the Department of Cardiology, Angiology, and Pulmonology, Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik I, Klinikum rechts der Isar (I.B., R.O., K.-L.L.), the Department of Cardiology, Klinikum der Universität...
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-10-17
Volume
381
Issue
16
Pages
1524-1534
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2971165578
Cited by
816
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 72 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 69 · 2023: 97 · 2022: 123 · 2021: 174 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 39 · 2013: 1
FWCI
89.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Regensburg Publication Server (University of Regensburg) (submittedVersion)
  • mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
German Center for Cardiovascular Research, Deutsches Herzzentrum München (FKZ 81X1600501)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
Keywords
ticagrelor, prasugrel, acute coronary syndrome, P2Y12 inhibitors, antiplatelet therapy, major bleeding, stent thrombosis, myocardial infarction, stroke, mortality, invasive coronary angiography, ST-elevation myocardial infarction, bleeding risk stratification, bleeding risk prediction model
MeSH terms
Prasugrel Hydrochloride, Ticagrelor, Aged, Coronary Thrombosis, Female, Hemorrhage, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors, Stents, Incidence, Stroke, Kaplan-Meier Estimate, Acute Coronary Syndrome, Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review