Cited by 605Tuberculosis Research and EpidemiologyImmune responses and vaccinationsInfectious Diseases and Tuberculosis

Final Analysis of a Trial of M72/AS01 E Vaccine to Prevent Tuberculosis

Open access
Tait, Dereck R., Hatherill, Mark, Van Der Meeren, Olivier, Ginsberg, Ann M., Van Brakel, Elana, Salaun, Bruno, Scriba, Thomas J., Akite, Elaine J. +19 more·2019·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUNDResults of an earlier analysis of a trial of the M72/AS01 E candidate vaccine against Mycobacterium tuberculosis showed that in infected adults, the vaccine provided 54.0% protection against active pulmonary tuberculosis disease, without evident safety concerns.We now report the results of the 3-year final analysis of efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. METHODSFrom August 2014 through November 2015, we enrolled adults 18 to 50 years of age with M. tuberculosis infection (defined by positive results on interferon-γ release assay) without evidence of active tuberculosis disease at centers in Kenya, South Africa, and Zambia.Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive two doses of either M72/AS01 E or placebo, administered 1 month apart.The primary objective was to evaluate the efficacy of M72/AS01 E to prevent active pulmonary tuberculosis disease according to the first case definition (bacteriologically confirmed pulmonary tuberculosis not associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection).Participants were followed for 3 years after the second dose.Participants with clinical suspicion of tuberculosis provided sputum samples for polymerase-chain-reaction assay, mycobacterial culture, or both.Humoral and cell-mediated immune responses were evaluated until month 36 in a subgroup of 300 participants.Safety was assessed in all participants who received at least one dose of M72/AS01 E or placebo. RESULTSA total of 3575 participants underwent randomization, of whom 3573 received at least one dose of M72/AS01 E or placebo, and 3330 received both planned doses.Among the 3289 participants in the according-to-protocol efficacy cohort, 13 of the 1626 participants in the M72/AS01 E group, as compared with 26 of the 1663 participants in the placebo group, had cases of tuberculosis that met the first case definition (incidence, 0.3 vs. 0.6 cases per 100 person-years).The vaccine efficacy at month 36 was 49.7% (90% confidence interval [CI], 12.1 to 71.2; 95% CI, 2.1 to 74.2).Among participants in the M72/AS01 E group, the concentrations of M72-specific antibodies and the frequencies of M72-specific CD4+ T cells increased after the first dose and were sustained throughout the follow-up period.Serious adverse events, potential immune-mediated diseases, and deaths occurred with similar frequencies in the two groups. CONCLUSIONSAmong adults infected with M. tuberculosis, vaccination with M72/AS01 E elicited an immune response and provided protection against progression to pulmonary tuberculosis disease for at least 3 years.(Funded by GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals and Aeras; Clini-calTrials.govnumber, NCT01755598.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa1909953

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study in 2019 showed that a novel TB vaccine, M72/AS01E (an AS01-adjuvanted vaccine containing the M. tuberculosis antigens MTB32A and MTB39A), could limit progression to active TB disease in latently infected individuals with efficacy of 50% over 3 years.

    “the publication of a study in 2019 showing that a novel TB vaccine, M72/AS01E (an AS01-adjuvanted vaccine containing the M. tuberculosis antigens MTB32A and MTB39A), could limit progression to active TB disease in latently infected individuals with efficacy of 50% over 3 years gives a glimmer of hope that TB control may be realized in the future by novel vaccine approaches117.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tait, D. R., Hatherill, M., Van Der Meeren, O., Ginsberg, A. M., Van Brakel, E., Salaun, B., Scriba, T. J., Akite, E. J., Ayles, H. M., Bollaerts, A., Demoitié, M.-A., Diacon, A., Evans, T. G., Gillard, P., Hellström, E., Innes, J. C., Lempicki, M., Malahleha, M., Martinson, N., Mesia Vela, D., Muyoyeta, M., Nduba, V., Pascal, T. G., Tameris, M., Thienemann, F., Wilkinson, R. J., & Roman, F.
Affiliations
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • From the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (IAVI) (D.R.T.), the South African Tuberculosis Vaccine Initiative, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine and Division of Immunology, Department of Pathology (M.H., T.J.S., M.T.), and the Wellcome Centre for Infectious Diseases Research in Africa, Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine (F.T., R.J.W.), University of Cape Town, TASK Applied Science (E.V.B., A.D.), and Stellenbosch University (A.D.), Cape Town, the Be Part...
  • International AIDS Vaccine Initiative (US)
  • South African Medical Research Council (ZA)
  • Centre for Infectious Disease Research in Zambia (ZM)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2019-12-19
Volume
381
Issue
25
Pages
2429-2439
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2982353502
Cited by
605
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 89 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 93 · 2023: 100 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 72 · 2020: 67 · 2019: 5
FWCI
41.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • LSHTM Research Online (London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine) (acceptedVersion)
  • SUNScholar (Stellenbosch University) (submittedVersion)
  • Spiral (Imperial College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals SA
  • Aeras Global Tuberculosis Vaccine Foundation
  • International AIDS Vaccine Initiative
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Tuberculosis Research and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Immune responses and vaccinations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Infectious Diseases and Tuberculosis
Keywords
tuberculosis vaccine, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, vaccine efficacy, immunogenicity, humoral immune response, CD4+ T cells, vaccine safety, latent tuberculosis infection, interferon-gamma release assay, tuberculosis incidence, HIV-negative individuals
MeSH terms
Immunogenicity, Vaccine, Adolescent, Adult, Africa, Double-Blind Method, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, Tuberculosis, Pulmonary, Proportional Hazards Models, HIV Seronegativity, Disease Progression, Tuberculosis Vaccines, Young Adult, Latent Tuberculosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review