Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,835

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19

Open access
Kalil, Andre C., Patterson, Thomas F., Mehta, Aneesh K., Tomashek, Kay M., Wolfe, Cameron R., Ghazaryan, Varduhi, Marconi, Vincent C., Ruiz-Palacios, Guillermo M., Hsieh, Lanny, Kline, Susan, Tapson, Victor, Iovine, Nicole M., Jain, Mamta K., Sweeney, Daniel A., El Sahly, Hana M., Branche, Angela R., Regalado Pineda, Justino, Lye, David C., Sandkovsky, Uriel, Luetkemeyer, Anne F., Cohen, Stuart H., Finberg, Robert W., Jackson, Patrick E.H., Taiwo, Babafemi, Paules, Catharine I., Arguinchona, Henry, Erdmann, Nathaniel, Ahuja, Neera, Frank, Maria, Oh, Myoung-don, Kim, Eu-Suk, Tan, Seow Y., Mularski, Richard A., Nielsen, Henrik, Ponce, Philip O., Taylor, Barbara S., Larson, LuAnn, Rouphael, Nadine G., Saklawi, Youssef, Cantos, Valeria D., Ko, Emily R., Engemann, John J., Amin, Alpesh N., Watanabe, Miki, Billings, Joanne, Elie, Marie-Carmelle, Davey, Richard T., Burgess, Timothy H., Ferreira, Jennifer, Green, Michelle, Makowski, Mat, Cardoso, Anabela, de Bono, Stephanie, Bonnett, Tyler, Proschan, Michael, Deye, Gregory A., Dempsey, Walla, Nayak, Seema U., Dodd, Lori E., Beigel, John H.·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Severe coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) is associated with dysregulated inflammation. The effects of combination treatment with baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor, plus remdesivir are not known. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial evaluating baricitinib plus remdesivir in hospitalized adults with Covid-19. All the patients received remdesivir (≤10 days) and either baricitinib (≤14 days) or placebo (control). The primary outcome was the time to recovery. The key secondary outcome was clinical status at day 15. RESULTS: A total of 1033 patients underwent randomization (with 515 assigned to combination treatment and 518 to control). Patients receiving baricitinib had a median time to recovery of 7 days (95% confidence interval [CI], 6 to 8), as compared with 8 days (95% CI, 7 to 9) with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.32; P = 0.03), and a 30% higher odds of improvement in clinical status at day 15 (odds ratio, 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0 to 1.6). Patients receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation at enrollment had a time to recovery of 10 days with combination treatment and 18 days with control (rate ratio for recovery, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.10 to 2.08). The 28-day mortality was 5.1% in the combination group and 7.8% in the control group (hazard ratio for death, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.09). Serious adverse events were less frequent in the combination group than in the control group (16.0% vs. 21.0%; difference, -5.0 percentage points; 95% CI, -9.8 to -0.3; P = 0.03), as were new infections (5.9% vs. 11.2%; difference, -5.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.7 to -1.9; P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Baricitinib plus remdesivir was superior to remdesivir alone in reducing recovery time and accelerating improvement in clinical status among patients with Covid-19, notably among those receiving high-flow oxygen or noninvasive ventilation. The combination was associated with fewer serious adverse events. (Funded by the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04401579.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2031994

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 1,835

Metadata

Authors
Kalil, A. C., Patterson, T. F., Mehta, A. K., Tomashek, K. M., Wolfe, C. R., Ghazaryan, V., Marconi, V. C., Ruiz-Palacios, G. M., Hsieh, L., Kline, S., Tapson, V., Iovine, N. M., Jain, M. K., Sweeney, D. A., El Sahly, H. M., Branche, A. R., Regalado Pineda, J., Lye, D. C., Sandkovsky, U., Luetkemeyer, A. F., Cohen, S. H., Finberg, R. W., Jackson, P. E. H., Taiwo, B., Paules, C. I., Arguinchona, H., Erdmann, N., Ahuja, N., Frank, M., Oh, M.-D., Kim, E.-S., Tan, S. Y., Mularski, R. A., Nielsen, H., Ponce, P. O., Taylor, B. S., Larson, L., Rouphael, N. G., Saklawi, Y., Cantos, V. D., Ko, E. R., Engemann, J. J., Amin, A. N., Watanabe, M., Billings, J., Elie, M.-C., Davey, R. T., Burgess, T. H., Ferreira, J., Green, M., Makowski, M., Cardoso, A., de Bono, S., Bonnett, T., Proschan, M., Deye, G. A., Dempsey, W., Nayak, S. U., Dodd, L. E., & Beigel, J. H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-03-04
Volume
384
Issue
9
Pages
795-807
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3113196149
Cited by
1,835
References
5
FWCI
44.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2031994
The paper
Kalil, A. C., Patterson, T. F., Mehta, A. K., Tomashek, K. M., Wolfe, C. R., Ghazaryan, V., Marconi, V. C., Ruiz-Palacios, G. M., Hsieh, L., Kline, S., Tapson, V., Iovine, N. M., Jain, M. K., Sweeney, D. A., El Sahly, H. M., Branche, A. R., Regalado Pineda, J., Lye, D. C., Sandkovsky, U., . . . Beigel, J. H. (2021). Baricitinib plus Remdesivir for Hospitalized Adults with Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2031994

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.