Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 873

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Early High-Titer Plasma Therapy to Prevent Severe Covid-19 in Older Adults

Open access
Libster, Romina, Pérez Marc, Gonzalo, Wappner, Diego, Coviello, Silvina, Bianchi, Alejandra, Braem, Virginia, Esteban, Ignacio, Caballero, Mauricio T., Wood, Cristian, Berrueta, Mabel, Rondan, Aníbal, Lescano, Gabriela, Cruz, Pablo, Ritou, Yvonne, Fernández Viña, Valeria, Álvarez Paggi, Damián, Esperante, Sebastián, Ferreti, Adrián, Ofman, Gastón, Ciganda, Álvaro, Rodriguez, Rocío, Lantos, Jorge, Valentini, Ricardo, Itcovici, Nicolás, Hintze, Alejandra, Oyarvide, M. Laura, Etchegaray, Candela, Neira, Alejandra, Name, Ivonne, Alfonso, Julieta, López Castelo, Rocío, Caruso, Gisela, Rapelius, Sofía, Alvez, Fernando, Etchenique, Federico, Dimase, Federico, Alvarez, Darío, Aranda, Sofía S., Sánchez Yanotti, Clara, De Luca, Julián, Jares Baglivo, Sofía, Laudanno, Sofía, Nowogrodzki, Florencia, Larrea, Ramiro, Silveyra, María, Leberzstein, Gabriel, Debonis, Alejandra, Molinos, Juan, González, Miguel, Perez, Eduardo, Kreplak, Nicolás, Pastor Argüello, Susana, Gibbons, Luz, Althabe, Fernando, Bergel, Eduardo, Polack, Fernando P.·2021·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

Abstract Background Therapies to interrupt progression of early COVID-19 remain elusive. Among them, convalescent plasma in hospitalized patients was unsuccessful, perhaps because antibody should be administered earlier. We advanced plasma infusions to the first 72 hours of symptoms to arrest COVID-19 progression. Methods A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of convalescent plasma with high IgG titers against SARS-CoV2 in elderly subjects within 72 hours of mild COVID-19 symptoms. The primary endpoint was severe respiratory disease defined as a respiratory rate ≥30 and/or an O 2 sat<93% in room air. The study was interrupted at 76% of its projected sample size, because cases in the region decreased considerably and steady enrollment of study subjects became virtually impossible. Results 160 patients underwent randomization. In the intention-to-treat analysis (ITT), 13/80(16.2%) patients receiving plasma vs. 25/80(31.2%) receiving placebo experienced severe respiratory disease [RR(95%CI)= 0.52(0.29,0.94); p=0.026)] with an RRR=48%. A modified ITT analysis, excluding six subjects who experienced the primary endpoint before infusion, showed a larger effect size [RR(95%CI) = 0.40(0.20, 0.81), p=0.007]. High- and low-titer donor analyses, based on a median IgG titer=1:3,200, evidenced a dose-dependent response with an RRR=73.3% for recipients of high-titer plasma (p=0.016) and a number needed to treat (NNT)=4.4. All secondary endpoints exhibited trends towards protection. No solicited adverse events were observed. Conclusions Early administration of high-titer convalescent plasma against SARS-CoV2 to mildly ill infected seniors reduced COVID-19 progression. This safe, inexpensive, outpatient intervention facilitates access to treatment from industrialized to LMIC, can decompress demands on hospitals, and may contribute to save lives. Funded by The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and The Fundación INFANT Pandemic Fund. Registered in the Dirección de Sangre y Medicina Transfusional del Ministerio de Salud (PAEPCC19), Plataforma PRIISA (1421), and clinicaltrials . gov ( NCT04479163 ) . All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form at www.icmje.org/coi_disclosure.pdf and declare: no support from any organization for the submitted work; RL, GPM, DW and FPP are investigators in a phase 3 SARS CoV2 trial from Pfizer; no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2033700

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 18 references

Cited by

See all 873

Metadata

Authors
Libster, R., Pérez Marc, G., Wappner, D., Coviello, S., Bianchi, A., Braem, V., Esteban, I., Caballero, M. T., Wood, C., Berrueta, M., Rondan, A., Lescano, G., Cruz, P., Ritou, Y., Fernández Viña, V., Álvarez Paggi, D., Esperante, S., Ferreti, A., Ofman, G., Ciganda, Á., Rodriguez, R., Lantos, J., Valentini, R., Itcovici, N., Hintze, A., Oyarvide, M. L., Etchegaray, C., Neira, A., Name, I., Alfonso, J., López Castelo, R., Caruso, G., Rapelius, S., Alvez, F., Etchenique, F., Dimase, F., Alvarez, D., Aranda, S. S., Sánchez Yanotti, C., De Luca, J., Jares Baglivo, S., Laudanno, S., Nowogrodzki, F., Larrea, R., Silveyra, M., Leberzstein, G., Debonis, A., Molinos, J., González, M., Perez, E., Kreplak, N., Pastor Argüello, S., Gibbons, L., Althabe, F., Bergel, E., & Polack, F. P.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2021-02-18
Volume
384
Issue
7
Pages
610-618
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3119294059
Cited by
873
References
18
FWCI
61.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Early High-Titer Plasma Therapy to Prevent Severe Covid-19 in Older Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2033700
The paper
Libster, R., Pérez Marc, G., Wappner, D., Coviello, S., Bianchi, A., Braem, V., Esteban, I., Caballero, M. T., Wood, C., Berrueta, M., Rondan, A., Lescano, G., Cruz, P., Ritou, Y., Fernández Viña, V., Álvarez Paggi, D., Esperante, S., Ferreti, A., Ofman, G., . . . Polack, F. P. (2021). Early High-Titer Plasma Therapy to Prevent Severe Covid-19 in Older Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2033700

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.