CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,022

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells

Jackson, Cody B., Farzan, Michael, Chen, Bing, Choe, Hyeryun·2022·Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
DOI 10.1038/s41580-021-00418-xPMC PMC8491763
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41580-021-00418-x

Cites

59 of 59 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 204

  1. Lu, R. et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 395, 565–574 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  2. Walls, A. C. et al. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.058 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Lan, J. et al. Structure of the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain bound to the ACE2 receptor. Nature 581, 215–220 (2020). Together with Shang, J. et al., this study provides one of two early crystal structures of the SARS-CoV-2 RBD–ACE2 complex, revealing how the S protein recognizes its receptor. · DOI · Paper page
  4. Hofmann, H. et al. Human coronavirus NL63 employs the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor for cellular entry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7988–7993 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Fehr, A. R. & Perlman, S. Coronaviruses: an overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 1282, 1–23 (2015). · DOI
  6. Glowacka, I. et al. Evidence that TMPRSS2 activates the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus spike protein for membrane fusion and reduces viral control by the humoral immune response. J. Virol. 85, 4122–4134 (2011). · DOI
  7. Shulla, A. et al. A transmembrane serine protease is linked to the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus receptor and activates virus entry. J. Virol. 85, 873–882 (2011). · DOI
  8. Huang, I. C. et al. SARS coronavirus, but not human coronavirus NL63, utilizes cathepsin L to infect ACE2-expressing cells. J. Biol. Chem. 281, 3198–3203 (2006). · DOI
  9. Simmons, G. et al. Inhibitors of cathepsin L prevent severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus entry. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11876–11881 (2005). This study and that by Huang et al. (2006) are the first to identify the role of cathepsin L in processing of the SARS-CoV S protein. · DOI
  10. Inoue, Y. et al. Clathrin-dependent entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus into target cells expressing ACE2 with the cytoplasmic tail deleted. J. Virol. 81, 8722–8729 (2007). · DOI · Paper page
  11. Watanabe, Y., Allen, J. D., Wrapp, D., McLellan, J. S. & Crispin, M. Site-specific glycan analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 spike. Science 369, 330–333 (2020). · DOI
  12. Harrison, S. C. Viral membrane fusion. Virology 479–480, 498–507 (2015). · DOI
  13. Gobeil, S. M. et al. D614G mutation alters SARS-CoV-2 spike conformation and enhances protease cleavage at the S1/S2 junction. Cell Rep. 34, 108630 (2021). · DOI
  14. Yan, R. et al. Structural basis for the recognition of SARS-CoV-2 by full-length human ACE2. Science 367, 1444–1448 (2020). · DOI
  15. Xia, S. et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 (previously 2019-nCoV) infection by a highly potent pan-coronavirus fusion inhibitor targeting its spike protein that harbors a high capacity to mediate membrane fusion. Cell Res. 30, 343–355 (2020). · DOI
  16. Bangaru, S. et al. Structural analysis of full-length SARS-CoV-2 spike protein from an advanced vaccine candidate. Science 370, 1089–1094 (2020). · DOI
  17. Zhang, J. et al. Structural impact on SARS-CoV-2 spike protein by D614G substitution. Science 372, 525–530 (2021). This study provides the cryo-EM structure of the unmodified full-length SARS-CoV-2 S protein with the D614G mutation, supporting its role in stabilizing S1–S2 association. · DOI
  18. Turonova, B. et al. In situ structural analysis of SARS-CoV-2 spike reveals flexibility mediated by three hinges. Science 370, 203–208 (2020). · DOI
  19. Ke, Z. et al. Structures and distributions of SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins on intact virions. Nature 588, 498–502 (2020). This is one of the first reports on SARS-CoV-2 S trimers in situ on the virion surface imaged by cryo-EM and cryo-electron tomography, revealing their high-resolution structure, conformational flexibility and distribution. · DOI
  20. Liu, C. et al. The architecture of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 with postfusion spikes revealed by cryo-EM and cryo-ET. Structure 28, 1218–1224 (2020). · DOI
  21. Kunkel, F. & Herrler, G. Structural and functional analysis of the surface protein of human coronavirus OC43. Virology 195, 195–202 (1993). · DOI
  22. Schultze, B., Gross, H. J., Brossmer, R. & Herrler, G. The S protein of bovine coronavirus is a hemagglutinin recognizing 9-O-acetylated sialic acid as a receptor determinant. J. Virol. 65, 6232–6237 (1991). · DOI
  23. Krempl, C., Schultze, B., Laude, H. & Herrler, G. Point mutations in the S protein connect the sialic acid binding activity with the enteropathogenicity of transmissible gastroenteritis coronavirus. J. Virol. 71, 3285–3287 (1997). · DOI
  24. Zhou, H. et al. Structural definition of a neutralization epitope on the N-terminal domain of MERS-CoV spike glycoprotein. Nat. Commun. 10, 3068 (2019).
  25. Chi, X. et al. A neutralizing human antibody binds to the N-terminal domain of the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2. Science 369, 650–655 (2020). This is one of the first reports showing that the RBD and the NTD are the two major neutralizing targets on the SARS-CoV-2 S trimer. · DOI · Paper page
  26. Wang, Z. et al. mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies to SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03324-6 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  27. Wall, E. C. et al. Neutralising antibody activity against SARS-CoV-2 VOCs B.1.617.2 and B.1.351 by BNT162b2 vaccination. Lancet 397, 2331–2333 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Sheikh, A. et al. SARS-CoV-2 Delta VOC in Scotland: demographics, risk of hospital admission, and vaccine effectiveness. Lancet 397, 2461–2462 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  29. Grabowski, F., Preibisch, G., Gizinski, S., Kochanczyk, M. & Lipniacki, T. SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 has about twofold replicative advantage and acquires concerning mutations. Viruses https://doi.org/10.3390/v13030392 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  30. Tada, T. et al. SARS-CoV-2 lambda variant remains susceptible to neutralization by mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies and convalescent serum. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.02.450959 (2021). · DOI
  31. Li, F., Li, W., Farzan, M. & Harrison, S. C. Structure of SARS coronavirus spike receptor-binding domain complexed with receptor. Science 309, 1864–1868 (2005). This study provides the crystal structure of the SARS-CoV RBD bound to ACE2, illuminating an interface shared by SARS-CoV-2. · DOI
  32. Wells, H. L. et al. The evolutionary history of ACE2 usage within the coronavirus subgenus Sarbecovirus. Virus Evol. 7, veab007 (2021). · DOI
  33. Tong, P. et al. Memory B cell repertoire for recognition of evolving SARS-CoV-2 spike. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2021.07.025 (2021). · DOI
  34. Robbiani, D. F. et al. Convergent antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 in convalescent individuals. Nature 584, 437–442 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Pinto, D. et al. Cross-neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 by a human monoclonal SARS-CoV antibody. Nature 583, 290–295 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  36. Yuan, M. et al. A highly conserved cryptic epitope in the receptor binding domains of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV. Science 368, 630–633 (2020). · DOI
  37. Walls, A. C. et al. Tectonic conformational changes of a coronavirus spike glycoprotein promote membrane fusion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 11157–11162 (2017). · DOI
  38. Fan, X., Cao, D., Kong, L. & Zhang, X. Cryo-EM analysis of the post-fusion structure of the SARS-CoV spike glycoprotein. Nat. Commun. 11, 3618 (2020).
  39. Turner, A. J. & Hooper, N. M. The angiotensin-converting enzyme gene family: genomics and pharmacology. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 23, 177–183 (2002). · DOI
  40. Donoghue, M. et al. A novel angiotensin-converting enzyme-related carboxypeptidase (ACE2) converts angiotensin I to angiotensin 1–9. Circ. Res. 87, E1–E9 (2000). · DOI · Paper page
  41. Tipnis, S. R. et al. A human homolog of angiotensin-converting enzyme. Cloning and functional expression as a captopril-insensitive carboxypeptidase. J. Biol. Chem. 275, 33238–33243 (2000). · DOI
  42. Lu, G. et al. Molecular basis of binding between novel human coronavirus MERS-CoV and its receptor CD26. Nature 500, 227–231 (2013). · DOI
  43. Yeager, C. L. et al. Human aminopeptidase N is a receptor for human coronavirus 229E. Nature 357, 420–422 (1992). · DOI
  44. Li, W. et al. Receptor and viral determinants of SARS-coronavirus adaptation to human ACE2. EMBO J. 24, 1634–1643 (2005). · DOI
  45. Zhou, T. et al. Cryo-EM structures of SARS-CoV-2 spike without and with ACE2 reveal a pH-dependent switch to mediate endosomal positioning of receptor-binding domains. Cell Host Microbe 28, 867–879 e865 (2020). · DOI
  46. Xiao, T. et al. A trimeric human angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 as an anti-SARS-CoV-2 agent. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 28, 202–209 (2021). · DOI
  47. Song, W., Gui, M., Wang, X. & Xiang, Y. Cryo-EM structure of the SARS coronavirus spike glycoprotein in complex with its host cell receptor ACE2. PLoS Pathog. 14, e1007236 (2018).
  48. Hou, Y. J. et al. SARS-CoV-2 reverse genetics reveals a variable infection gradient in the respiratory tract. Cell 182, 429–446 (2020). This study shows that SARS-CoV-2 infection levels in COVID-19 autopsied lungs corresponds to a gradient of ACE2 expression in the upper and lower airways. · DOI · Paper page
  49. Wang, Y. et al. A comprehensive investigation of the mRNA and protein level of ACE2, the putative receptor of SARS-CoV-2, in human tissues and blood cells. Int. J. Med. Sci. 17, 1522–1531 (2020). · DOI
  50. Zou, X. et al. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front. Med. 14, 185–192 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Ahn, J. H. et al. Nasal ciliated cells are primary targets for SARS-CoV-2 replication in early stage of COVID-19. J. Clin. Invest. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI148517 (2021). · DOI
  52. Lee, I. T. et al. ACE2 localizes to the respiratory cilia and is not increased by ACE inhibitors or ARBs. Nat. Commun. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19145-6 (2020). This histological study of human donor tissues clarifies ACE2 tissue distribution and establishes that antihypertensive drugs do not potentiate SARS-CoV-2 infection. · DOI
  53. Ye, M. H. et al. Increased ACE 2 and decreased ACE protein in renal tubules from diabetic mice - a renoprotective combination? Hypertension 43, 1120–1125 (2004). · DOI
  54. Lindner, D. et al. Association of cardiac infection with SARS-CoV-2 in confirmed COVID-19 autopsy cases. JAMA Cardiol. 5, 1281–1285 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Zhuang, M.-W. et al. Increasing host cellular receptor-angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 expression by coronavirus may facilitate 2019-nCoV (or SARS-CoV-2) infection. J. Med. Virol. 92, 2693–2701 (2020). · DOI
  56. Smith, J. C. et al. Cigarette smoke exposure and inflammatory signaling increase the expression of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 in the respiratory tract. Dev. Cell 53, 514–529 (2020). · DOI
  57. Onabajo, O. O. et al. Interferons and viruses induce a novel truncated ACE2 isoform and not the full-length SARS-CoV-2 receptor. Nat. Genet. 52, 1283–1293 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  58. Baker, S. A., Kwok, S., Berry, G. J. & Montine, T. J. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) expression increases with age in patients requiring mechanical ventilation. PLoS ONE 16, e0247060 (2021).
  59. Muus, C. et al. Single-cell meta-analysis of SARS-CoV-2 entry genes across tissues and demographics. Nat. Med. 27, 546–559 (2021). · DOI
  60. Chen, J. et al. Individual variation of the SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 gene expression and regulation. Aging Cell https://doi.org/10.1111/acel.13168 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  61. Patanavanich, R. & Glantz, S. A. Smoking is associated with COVID-19 progression: a meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob. Res. 22, 1653–1656 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  62. Zhao, Q. et al. The impact of COPD and smoking history on the severity of COVID-19: a systemic review and meta-analysis. J. Med. Virol. 92, 1915–1921 (2020). · DOI
  63. Jacobs, M. et al. Increased expression of ACE2, the SARS-CoV-2 entry receptor, in alveolar and bronchial epithelium of smokers and COPD subjects. Eur. Respir. J. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.02378-2020 (2020). · DOI
  64. Leung, J. M. et al. ACE-2 expression in the small airway epithelia of smokers and COPD patients: implications for COVID-19. Eur. Respir. J. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.00688-2020 (2020). · DOI
  65. Rossato, M. et al. Current smoking is not associated with COVID-19. Eur. Respir. J. https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.01290-2020 (2020). · DOI
  66. Peters, M. C. et al. COVID-19-related genes in sputum cells in asthma. Relationship to demographic features and corticosteroids. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 202, 83–90 (2020). · DOI
  67. Furuhashi, M. et al. Urinary angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 in hypertensive patients may be increased by olmesartan, an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Am. J. Hypertens. 28, 15–21 (2015). · DOI
  68. Fang, L., Karakiulakis, G. & Roth, M. Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection? Lancet Respir. Med. 8, e21 (2020).
  69. Patel, A. B. & Verma, A. COVID-19 and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers: what is the evidence? JAMA 323, 1769–1770 (2020). · DOI
  70. Mancia, G., Rea, F., Ludergnani, M., Apolone, G. & Corrao, G. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers and the risk of Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 2431–2440 (2020). · DOI
  71. Reynolds, H. R. et al. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors and risk of Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 382, 2441–2448 (2020). · DOI
  72. Mou, H. et al. Mutations derived from horseshoe bat ACE2 orthologs enhance ACE2-Fc neutralization of SARS-CoV-2. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009501 (2021).
  73. Guan, Y. et al. Isolation and characterization of viruses related to the SARS coronavirus from animals in southern China. Science 302, 276–278 (2003). · DOI
  74. Lam, T. T. et al. Identifying SARS-CoV-2-related coronaviruses in Malayan pangolins. Nature 583, 282–285 (2020). · DOI
  75. Liu, P. et al. Are pangolins the intermediate host of the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2)? PLoS Pathog. 16, e1008421 (2020).
  76. Xiao, K. et al. Isolation of SARS-CoV-2-related coronavirus from Malayan pangolins. Nature 583, 286–289 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  77. Peiris, J. S., Guan, Y. & Yuen, K. Y. Severe acute respiratory syndrome. Nat. Med. 10, S88–S97 (2004). · DOI
  78. Zhou, H. et al. A novel bat coronavirus closely related to SARS-CoV-2 contains natural insertions at the S1/S2 cleavage site of the spike protein. Curr. Biol. 30, 2196–2203 e2193 (2020). · DOI
  79. Yan, H. et al. ACE2 receptor usage reveals variation in susceptibility to SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 infection among bat species. Nat. Ecol. Evol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-021-01407-1 (2021). · DOI
  80. Liu, Y. et al. Functional and genetic analysis of viral receptor ACE2 orthologs reveals a broad potential host range of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025373118 (2021). · DOI
  81. Jeffers, S. A. et al. CD209L (L-SIGN) is a receptor for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 101, 15748–15753 (2004). · DOI
  82. Yang, Z. Y. et al. pH-dependent entry of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus is mediated by the spike glycoprotein and enhanced by dendritic cell transfer through DC-SIGN. J. Virol. 78, 5642–5650 (2004). · DOI
  83. Amraie, R. et al. CD209L/L-SIGN and CD209/DC-SIGN act as receptors for SARS-CoV-2. ACS Cent. Sci. https://doi.org/10.1021/acscentsci.0c01537 (2021). · DOI
  84. Khoo, U. S., Chan, K. Y., Chan, V. S. & Lin, C. L. DC-SIGN and L-SIGN: the SIGNs for infection. J. Mol. Med. 86, 861–874 (2008). · DOI
  85. Geijtenbeek, T. B. et al. Identification of DC-SIGN, a novel dendritic cell-specific ICAM-3 receptor that supports primary immune responses. Cell 100, 575–585 (2000). · DOI
  86. Ichimura, T. et al. KIM-1/TIM-1 is a receptor for SARS-CoV-2 in lung and kidney. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.09.16.20190694 (2020). · DOI
  87. Wang, S. et al. AXL is a candidate receptor for SARS-CoV-2 that promotes infection of pulmonary and bronchial epithelial cells. Cell Res. 31, 126–140 (2021). · DOI
  88. Amara, A. & Mercer, J. Viral apoptotic mimicry. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 13, 461–469 (2015). · DOI
  89. Jemielity, S. et al. TIM-family proteins promote infection of multiple enveloped viruses through virion-associated phosphatidylserine. PLoS Pathog. 9, e1003232 (2013). · DOI
  90. Richard, A. S. et al. AXL-dependent infection of human fetal endothelial cells distinguishes Zika virus from other pathogenic flaviviruses. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, 2024–2029 (2017). · DOI
  91. Marzi, A. et al. DC-SIGN and DC-SIGNR interact with the glycoprotein of Marburg virus and the S protein of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Virol. 78, 12090–12095 (2004). · DOI
  92. Chen, Z. et al. Function of HAb18G/CD147 in invasion of host cells by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Infect. Dis. 191, 755–760 (2005). · DOI
  93. Wang, K. et al. CD147-spike protein is a novel route for SARS-CoV-2 infection to host cells. Signal. Transduct. Target. Ther. 5, 283 (2020). · DOI
  94. Costa, L. B. et al. Insights on SARS-CoV-2 molecular interactions with the renin-angiotensin system. Front. Cell Dev. Biol. 8, 559841 (2020). · DOI
  95. Shilts, J., Crozier, T. W. M., Greenwood, E. J. D., Lehner, P. J. & Wright, G. J. No evidence for basigin/CD147 as a direct SARS-CoV-2 spike binding receptor. Sci. Rep. 11, 413 (2021). · DOI
  96. Daly, J. L. et al. Neuropilin-1 is a host factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Science 370, 861–865 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  97. Zhen-Lu, L. & Matthias, B. Neuropilin-1 assists SARS-CoV-2 infection by stimulating the separation of spike protein domains S1 and S2. Biophys. J. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2021.05.026 (2021). · DOI
  98. Camargo, S. M. et al. Tissue-specific amino acid transporter partners ACE2 and collectrin differentially interact with hartnup mutations. Gastroenterology 136, 872–882 (2009). · DOI
  99. Belouzard, S., Chu, V. C. & Whittaker, G. R. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 106, 5871–5876 (2009). · DOI
  100. Zhang, L. et al. SARS-CoV-2 spike-protein D614G mutation increases virion spike density and infectivity. Nat. Commun. 11, 6013 (2020). This article shows that enhanced infectivity of the SARS-CoV-2 variants harbouring the D614G S protein mutation is due to a reduced level of premature S1 subunit shedding.
  101. Peacock, T. P. et al. The furin cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein is required for transmission in ferrets. Nat. Microbiol. 6, 899–909 (2021). This study demonstrates in ferrets a critical in vivo role for the S protein furin-cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 infection. · DOI
  102. Limburg, H. et al. TMPRSS2 is the major activating protease of influenza a virus in primary human airway cells and influenza B virus in human type II pneumocytes. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00649-19 (2019). · DOI
  103. Shen, L. W., Mao, H. J., Wu, Y. L., Tanaka, Y. & Zhang, W. TMPRSS2: a potential target for treatment of influenza virus and coronavirus infections. Biochimie 142, 1–10 (2017). · DOI
  104. Sakai, K. et al. TMPRSS2 independency for haemagglutinin cleavage in vivo differentiates influenza B virus from influenza A virus. Sci. Rep. 6, 29430 (2016).
  105. Szabo, R. & Bugge, T. H. Type II transmembrane serine proteases in development and disease. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 40, 1297–1316 (2008). · DOI
  106. Szabo, R. & Bugge, T. H. Membrane-anchored serine proteases in vertebrate cell and developmental biology. Annu. Rev. Cell Dev. Biol. 27, 213–235 (2011). · DOI
  107. Zhao, Y. et al. Single-cell RNA expression profiling of ACE2, the receptor of SARS-CoV-2. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 202, 756–759 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  108. Lukassen, S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 receptor ACE2 and TMPRSS2 are primarily expressed in bronchial transient secretory cells. EMBO J. 39, e105114 (2020). · DOI
  109. Laporte, M. & Naesens, L. Airway proteases: an emerging drug target for influenza and other respiratory virus infections. Curr. Opin. Virol. 24, 16–24 (2017). · DOI
  110. Ou, T. et al. Hydroxychloroquine-mediated inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 entry is attenuated by TMPRSS2. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009212 (2021). This study uses TMPRSS2 and cathepsin L inhibitors to show that SARS-CoV-2 is more dependent than SARS-CoV on TMPRSS2.
  111. Ozono, S. et al. SARS-CoV-2 D614G spike mutation increases entry efficiency with enhanced ACE2-binding affinity. Nat. Commun. 12, 848 (2021). · DOI
  112. Zhu, Y. et al. A genome-wide CRISPR screen identifies host factors that regulate SARS-CoV-2 entry. Nat. Commun. 12, 961 (2021).
  113. Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and Is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 181, 271–280 (2020). This is the first study to confirm that processing of the SARS-CoV-2 S protein is, like that of the SARS-CoV S protein, mediated by TMPRSS2. · DOI · Paper page
  114. Bosch, B. J., Bartelink, W. & Rottier, P. J. Cathepsin L functionally cleaves the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus class I fusion protein upstream of rather than adjacent to the fusion peptide. J. Virol. 82, 8887–8890 (2008). · DOI
  115. Ebert, D. H., Deussing, J., Peters, C. & Dermody, T. S. Cathepsin L and cathepsin B mediate reovirus disassembly in murine fibroblast cells. J. Biol. Chem. 277, 24609–24617 (2002). · DOI
  116. Chandran, K., Sullivan, N. J., Felbor, U., Whelan, S. P. & Cunningham, J. M. Endosomal proteolysis of the ebola virus glycoprotein is necessary for infection. Science 308, 1643 (2005). · DOI
  117. Shaik, M. M. et al. Structural basis of coreceptor recognition by HIV-1 envelope spike. Nature 565, 318–323 (2019). · DOI
  118. Campbell, G. R., To, R. K., Hanna, J. & Spector, S. A. SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV-1, and HIV-1 derived ssRNA sequences activate the NLRP3 inflammasome in human macrophages through a non-classical pathway. iScience 24, 102295 (2021). · DOI
  119. Jangra, S. et al. Sterilizing immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection in mice by a single-shot and lipid amphiphile imidazoquinoline TLR7/8 agonist-adjuvanted recombinant spike protein vaccine. Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 60, 9467–9473 (2021). · DOI
  120. Shi, G. et al. Opposing activities of IFITM proteins in SARS-CoV-2 infection. EMBO J. 40, e106501 (2021).
  121. Winstone, H. et al. The polybasic cleavage site in SARS-CoV-2 spike modulates viral sensitivity to type I interferon and IFITM2. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.02422-20 (2021). · DOI
  122. Pfaender, S. et al. LY6E impairs coronavirus fusion and confers immune control of viral disease. Nat. Microbiol. 5, 1330–1339 (2020). · DOI
  123. Zhao, X. et al. LY6E restricts entry of human coronaviruses, including currently pandemic SARS-CoV-2. J. Virol. https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00562-20 (2020). · DOI
  124. Brass, A. L. et al. The IFITM proteins mediate cellular resistance to influenza A H1N1 virus, West Nile virus, and dengue virus. Cell 139, 1243–1254 (2009). · DOI
  125. Huang, I. C. et al. Distinct patterns of IFITM-mediated restriction of filoviruses, SARS coronavirus, and influenza A virus. PLoS Pathog. 7, e1001258 (2011).
  126. Liu, S. Y., Sanchez, D. J., Aliyari, R., Lu, S. & Cheng, G. Systematic identification of type I and type II interferon-induced antiviral factors. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 4239–4244 (2012). · DOI
  127. Schoggins, J. W. et al. A diverse range of gene products are effectors of the type I interferon antiviral response. Nature 472, 481–485 (2011). · DOI
  128. Yu, J., Liang, C. & Liu, S. L. Interferon-inducible LY6E protein promotes HIV-1 infection. J. Biol. Chem. 292, 4674–4685 (2017). · DOI
  129. Hackett, B. A. & Cherry, S. Flavivirus internalization is regulated by a size-dependent endocytic pathway. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 4246–4251 (2018). · DOI
  130. Mar, K. B. et al. LY6E mediates an evolutionarily conserved enhancement of virus infection by targeting a late entry step. Nat. Commun. 9, 3603 (2018).
  131. Li, X. et al. Emergence of SARS-CoV-2 through recombination and strong purifying selection. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb9153 (2020).
  132. Menachery, V. D. et al. A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence. Nat. Med. 21, 1508–1513 (2015). · DOI
  133. Zhang, Y. Z. & Holmes, E. C. A genomic perspective on the origin and emergence of SARS-CoV-2. Cell 181, 223–227 (2020). · DOI
  134. Andersen, K. G., Rambaut, A., Lipkin, W. I., Holmes, E. C. & Garry, R. F. The proximal origin of SARS-CoV-2. Nat. Med. 26, 450–452 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  135. Ogando, N. S. et al. SARS-coronavirus-2 replication in Vero E6 cells: replication kinetics, rapid adaptation and cytopathology. J. Gen. Virol. 101, 925–940 (2020). · DOI
  136. Sasaki, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants with mutations at the S1/S2 cleavage site are generated in vitro during propagation in TMPRSS2-deficient cells. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009233 (2021). This article shows that the furin-cleavage site in the SARS-CoV-2 S protein is rapidly lost during virus propagation in vitro, which was subsequently confirmed in multiple studies.
  137. Pohl, M. O. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants reveal features critical for replication in primary human cells. PLos Biol. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3001006 (2021). · DOI
  138. Mykytyn, A. Z. et al. SARS-CoV-2 entry into human airway organoids is serine protease-mediated and facilitated by the multibasic cleavage site. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64508 (2021). · DOI
  139. Lamers, M. M. et al. Human airway cells prevent SARS-CoV-2 multibasic cleavage site cell culture adaptation. eLife 10, e66815 (2021). · DOI
  140. Jackson, C. B., Zhang, L., Farzan, M. & Choe, H. Functional importance of the D614G mutation in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 538, 108–115 (2021). · DOI
  141. Fernández, A. Structural impact of mutation D614G in SARS-CoV-2 spike protein: enhanced infectivity and therapeutic opportunity. ACS Med. Chem. Lett. 11, 1667–1670 (2020). · DOI
  142. Michaud, W. A., Boland, G. M. & Rabi, S. A. The SARS-CoV-2 spike mutation D614G increases entry fitness across a range of ACE2 levels, directly outcompetes the wild type, and is preferentially incorporated into trimers. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.08.25.267500 (2020). · DOI
  143. Juraszek, J. et al. Stabilizing the closed SARS-CoV-2 spike trimer. Nat. Commun. 12, 244 (2021). · DOI
  144. Yurkovetskiy, L. et al. Structural and functional analysis of the D614G SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variant. Cell https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2020.09.032 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  145. Benton, D. J. et al. The effect of the D614G substitution on the structure of the spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2022586118 (2021). · DOI
  146. Starr, T. N. et al. Deep mutational scanning of SARS-CoV-2 receptor binding domain reveals constraints on folding and ACE2 binding. Cell 182, 1295–1310 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  147. Wong, S. K., Li, W., Moore, M. J., Choe, H. & Farzan, M. A 193-amino acid fragment of the SARS coronavirus S protein efficiently binds angiotensin-converting enzyme 2. J. Biol. Chem. 279, 3197–3201 (2004). This study is the first to identify the SARS-CoV RBD. · DOI
  148. Liu, H. et al. The basis of a more contagious 501Y.V1 variant of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Res. 31, 720–722 (2021). · DOI
  149. Tian, F. et al. N501Y mutation of spike protein in SARS-CoV-2 strengthens its binding to receptor ACE2. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.69091 (2021). · DOI
  150. Yao, W. et al. Circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7, 501Y.V2, and P.1 have gained ability to utilize rat and mouse Ace2 and altered in vitro sensitivity to neutralizing antibodies and ACE2-Ig. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.01.27.428353 (2021). · DOI
  151. Montagutelli, X. et al. The B1.351 and P.1 variants extend SARS-CoV-2 host range to mice. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.18.436013 (2021). · DOI
  152. Adam, D. What scientists know about new, fast-spreading coronavirus variants. Nature 594, 19–20 (2021). · DOI
  153. Frazier, L. et al. Spike protein cleavage-activation mediated by the SARS-CoV-2 P681R mutation: a case-study from its first appearance in variant of interest (VOI) A.23.1 identified in Uganda. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.30.450632 (2021). · DOI
  154. Hoffmann, M. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.351 and P.1 escape from neutralizing antibodies. Cell 184, 2384–2393 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  155. Shen, X. et al. SARS-CoV-2 variant B.1.1.7 is susceptible to neutralizing antibodies elicited by ancestral spike vaccines. Cell Host Microbe https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chom.2021.03.002 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  156. Piccoli, L. et al. Mapping neutralizing and immunodominant sites on the SARS-CoV-2 spike receptor-binding domain by structure-guided high-resolution serology. Cell 183, 1024–1042 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  157. Thomson, E. C. et al. Circulating SARS-CoV-2 spike N439K variants maintain fitness while evading antibody-mediated immunity. Cell 184, 1171–1187 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  158. Chen, R. E. et al. Resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants to neutralization by monoclonal and serum-derived polyclonal antibodies. Nat. Med. 27, 717–726 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  159. Andreano, E. et al. SARS-CoV-2 escape from a highly neutralizing COVID-19 convalescent plasma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2103154118 (2021). · DOI
  160. Deng, X. et al. Transmission, infectivity, and neutralization of a spike L452R SARS-CoV-2 variant. Cell 184, 3426–3437 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  161. Lok, S. M. An NTD supersite of attack. Cell Host Microbe 29, 744–746 (2021). · DOI
  162. Suryadevara, N. et al. Neutralizing and protective human monoclonal antibodies recognizing the N-terminal domain of the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein. Cell 184, 2316–2331 (2021). · DOI
  163. Weisblum, Y. et al. Escape from neutralizing antibodies by SARS-CoV-2 spike protein variants. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61312 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  164. Graham, R. L. & Baric, R. S. Recombination, reservoirs, and the modular spike: mechanisms of coronavirus cross-species transmission. J. Virol. 84, 3134–3146 (2010). · DOI
  165. Frampton, D. et al. Genomic characteristics and clinical effect of the emergent SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 lineage in London, UK: a whole-genome sequencing and hospital-based cohort study. Lancet Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1473-3099(21)00170-5 (2021). · DOI
  166. Vignier, N. et al. Breakthrough Infections of SARS-CoV-2 Gamma variant in fully vaccinated gold miners, French Guiana, 2021. Emerg. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2710.211427 (2021). · DOI
  167. Farinholt, T. et al. Transmission event of SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant reveals multiple vaccine breakthrough infections. Preprint at medRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.28.21258780 (2021). · DOI
  168. Zhou, H. et al. B.1.526 SARS-CoV-2 variants identified in New York City are neutralized by vaccine-elicited and therapeutic monoclonal antibodies. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.24.436620 (2021). · DOI
  169. Ferreira, I. et al. SARS-CoV-2 B.1.617 mutations L452 and E484Q are not synergistic for antibody evasion. J. Infect. Dis. https://doi.org/10.1093/infdis/jiab368 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  170. Palacios, R. et al. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III clinical trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of treating healthcare professionals with the adsorbed COVID-19 (inactivated) vaccine manufactured by Sinovac - PROFISCOV: a structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials 21, 853 (2020). · DOI
  171. Logunov, D. Y. et al. Safety and efficacy of an rAd26 and rAd5 vector-based heterologous prime-boost COVID-19 vaccine: an interim analysis of a randomised controlled phase 3 trial in Russia. Lancet 397, 671–681 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  172. Barrett, J. R. et al. Phase 1/2 trial of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 with a booster dose induces multifunctional antibody responses. Nat. Med. 27, 279–288 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  173. Gosert, R., Kanjanahaluethai, A., Egger, D., Bienz, K. & Baker, S. C. RNA replication of mouse hepatitis virus takes place at double-membrane vesicles. J. Virol. 76, 3697–3708 (2002). · DOI
  174. Knoops, K. et al. SARS-coronavirus replication is supported by a reticulovesicular network of modified endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS Biol. 6, e226 (2008). · DOI
  175. Stertz, S. et al. The intracellular sites of early replication and budding of SARS-coronavirus. Virology 361, 304–315 (2007). · DOI
  176. Wolff, G. et al. A molecular pore spans the double membrane of the coronavirus replication organelle. Science 369, 1395–1398 (2020). · DOI
  177. Goldsmith, C. S. et al. Ultrastructural characterization of SARS coronavirus. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 10, 320–326 (2004). · DOI
  178. Neuman, B. W. et al. A structural analysis of M protein in coronavirus assembly and morphology. J. Struct. Biol. 174, 11–22 (2011). · DOI
  179. Schoeman, D. & Fielding, B. C. Coronavirus envelope protein: current knowledge. Virol. J. 16, 69 (2019). · DOI
  180. Wang, P. G., Tang, D. J., Hua, Z., Wang, Z. & An, J. Sunitinib reduces the infection of SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2 partially by inhibiting AP2M1 phosphorylation. Cell Discov. 6, 71 (2020). · DOI
  181. Zhang, Q. et al. Heparan sulfate assists SARS-CoV-2 in cell entry and can be targeted by approved drugs in vitro. Cell Discov. 6, 80 (2020). · DOI
  182. Yang, Q. et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 viral entry upon blocking N- and O-glycan elaboration. eLife https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.61552 (2020). · DOI
  183. Zhu, Y., Yu, D., Yan, H., Chong, H. & He, Y. Design of potent membrane fusion inhibitors against SARS-CoV-2, an emerging coronavirus with high fusogenic activity. J. Virol. 94, https://doi.org/10.1128/JVI.00635-20 (2020). · DOI
  184. Xiu, S. et al. Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 entry: current and future opportunities. J. Med. Chem. 63, 12256–12274 (2020). · DOI
  185. Salazar, E. et al. Treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 patients with convalescent plasma reveals a signal of significantly decreased mortality. Am. J. Pathol. 190, 2290–2303 (2020). · DOI
  186. Libster, R. et al. Early high-titer plasma therapy to prevent severe Covid-19 in older adults. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 610–618 (2021). · DOI
  187. Li, L. et al. Effect of convalescent plasma therapy on time to clinical improvement in patients with severe and life-threatening COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 324, 460–470 (2020). · DOI
  188. Liu, S. T. H. et al. Convalescent plasma treatment of severe COVID-19: a propensity score-matched control study. Nat. Med. 26, 1708–1713 (2020). · DOI
  189. Simonovich, V. A. et al. A randomized trial of convalescent plasma in Covid-19 severe pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 619–629 (2021). · DOI
  190. Joyner, M. J. et al. Convalescent plasma antibody levels and the risk of death from Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 384, 1015–1027 (2021). · DOI
  191. Wang, C. et al. A human monoclonal antibody blocking SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat. Commun. 11, 2251 (2020).
  192. Lv, Z. et al. Structural basis for neutralization of SARS-CoV-2 and SARS-CoV by a potent therapeutic antibody. Science 369, 1505–1509 (2020). · DOI
  193. Koenig, P.-A. et al. Structure-guided multivalent nanobodies block SARS-CoV-2 infection and suppress mutational escape. Science 371, eabe6230 (2021).
  194. Schoof, M. et al. An ultrapotent synthetic nanobody neutralizes SARS-CoV-2 by stabilizing inactive spike. Science 370, 1473–1479 (2020). · DOI
  195. Mahase, E. Covid-19: FDA authorises neutralising antibody bamlanivimab for non-admitted patients. BMJ 371, m4362 (2020). · DOI
  196. Gottlieb, R. L. et al. Effect of bamlanivimab as monotherapy or in combination with etesevimab on viral load in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 325, 632–644 (2021). · DOI
  197. Chen, Y. et al. ACE2-targeting monoclonal antibody as a “pan” coronavirus blocker in vitro and in a mouse model. Preprint at bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2020.11.11.375972 (2020). · DOI
  198. Tada, T. et al. An ACE2 microbody containing a single immunoglobulin Fc domain is a potent inhibitor of SARS-CoV-2. Cell Rep. 33, 108528 (2020). · DOI
  199. Monteil, V. et al. Inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 infections in engineered human tissues using clinical-grade soluble human ACE2. Cell 181, 905–913 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  200. Sims, J. J. et al. Intranasal gene therapy to prevent infection by SARS-CoV-2 variants. PLoS Pathog. 17, e1009544 (2021).

200 of 204 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Jackson, C. B., Farzan, M., Chen, B., & Choe, H.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2021-10-05
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
3-20
ISSN
  • 1471-0072
  • 1471-0080
DOI
10.1038/s41580-021-00418-x
PMC
PMC8491763
Cited by
3,022
References
59
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review