Cited by 1,362COVID-19 Clinical Research StudiesRespiratory Support and MechanismsSARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research

Efficacy of Tocilizumab in Patients Hospitalized with Covid-19

Open access
Stone, John H., Frigault, Matthew J., Serling-Boyd, Naomi J., Fernandes, Ana D., Harvey, Liam, Foulkes, Andrea S., Horick, Nora K., Healy, Brian C. +40 more·2020·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of interleukin-6 receptor blockade in hospitalized patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) who are not receiving mechanical ventilation is unclear. METHODS: We performed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial involving patients with confirmed severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, hyperinflammatory states, and at least two of the following signs: fever (body temperature >38°C), pulmonary infiltrates, or the need for supplemental oxygen in order to maintain an oxygen saturation greater than 92%. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive standard care plus a single dose of either tocilizumab (8 mg per kilogram of body weight) or placebo. The primary outcome was intubation or death, assessed in a time-to-event analysis. The secondary efficacy outcomes were clinical worsening and discontinuation of supplemental oxygen among patients who had been receiving it at baseline, both assessed in time-to-event analyses. RESULTS: We enrolled 243 patients; 141 (58%) were men, and 102 (42%) were women. The median age was 59.8 years (range, 21.7 to 85.4), and 45% of the patients were Hispanic or Latino. The hazard ratio for intubation or death in the tocilizumab group as compared with the placebo group was 0.83 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.38 to 1.81; P = 0.64), and the hazard ratio for disease worsening was 1.11 (95% CI, 0.59 to 2.10; P = 0.73). At 14 days, 18.0% of the patients in the tocilizumab group and 14.9% of the patients in the placebo group had had worsening of disease. The median time to discontinuation of supplemental oxygen was 5.0 days (95% CI, 3.8 to 7.6) in the tocilizumab group and 4.9 days (95% CI, 3.8 to 7.8) in the placebo group (P = 0.69). At 14 days, 24.6% of the patients in the tocilizumab group and 21.2% of the patients in the placebo group were still receiving supplemental oxygen. Patients who received tocilizumab had fewer serious infections than patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Tocilizumab was not effective for preventing intubation or death in moderately ill hospitalized patients with Covid-19. Some benefit or harm cannot be ruled out, however, because the confidence intervals for efficacy comparisons were wide. (Funded by Genentech; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04356937.).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2028836

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a randomized trial, tocilizumab did not prevent intubation or death in moderately ill patients.

    “A randomized clinical trial assessing tocilizumab, an anti-IL-6 antibody (Stone et al., 2020), showed no benefit for moderately ill patients concerning effectiveness of preventing intubation or death.”

    From COVID-19 and the human innate immune system (2021) · cites this paper as Stone et al., 2020

  • Two large, randomized, controlled trials of anti-interleukin-6 receptor antibody therapies did not show a survival benefit in hospitalized patients with Covid-19.

    “Despite positive anecdotal reports, two large, randomized, controlled trials of anti–interleukin-6 receptor antibody therapies did not show a survival benefit in hospitalized patients with Covid-19.97,98”

    From Cytokine storm (2020) · cites this paper as [98]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stone, J. H., Frigault, M. J., Serling-Boyd, N. J., Fernandes, A. D., Harvey, L., Foulkes, A. S., Horick, N. K., Healy, B. C., Shah, R., Bensaci, A. M., Woolley, A. E., Nikiforow, S., Lin, N., Sagar, M., Schrager, H., Huckins, D. S., Axelrod, M., Pincus, M. D., Fleisher, J., Sacks, C. A., Dougan, M., North, C. M., Halvorsen, Y.-D., Thurber, T. K., Dagher, Z., Scherer, A., Wallwork, R. S., Kim, A. Y., Schoenfeld, S., Sen, P., Neilan, T. G., Perugino, C. A., Unizony, S. H., Collier, D. S., Matza, M. A., Yinh, J. M., Bowman, K. A., Meyerowitz, E., Zafar, A., Drobni, Z. D., Bolster, M. B., Kohler, M., D’Silva, K. M., Dau, J., Lockwood, M. M., Cubbison, C., Weber, B. N., & Mansour, M. K.
Affiliations
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
  • From Massachusetts General Hospital (J.H.S., M.J.F., N.J.S.-B., A.D.F., L.H., A.S.F., N.K.H., B.C.H., C.A.S., M.D., C.M.N., Y.-D.H., T.K.T., Z.D., A.S., R.S.W., A.Y.K., S.S., P.S., T.G.N., C.A.P., S.H.U., D.S.C., M.A.M., J.M.Y., K.A.B., E.M., A.Z., Z.D.D., M.B.B., M.K., K.M.D., J.D., M.M.L., M.K.M.), Brigham and Women’s Hospital (A.E.W., S.N., B.N.W.), and Boston Medical Center (N.L., M.S.), Boston, North Shore Medical Center, Salem (R.S., A.M.B., C.C.), Newton–Wellesley Hospital, Newton (H.S., D.S...
Corresponding author
Stone, John H.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2020-12-10
Volume
383
Issue
24
Pages
2333-2344
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W3093604087
Cited by
1,362
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 80 · 2023: 149 · 2022: 305 · 2021: 684 · 2020: 86 · 2012: 1
FWCI
40.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Genentech (ML42488)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Respiratory Support and Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Keywords
tocilizumab, COVID-19 pandemic, SARS-CoV-2, IL-6 receptor inhibition, hyperinflammation, hospitalized patients, intubation, mortality, supplemental oxygen, disease worsening, cytokine storm, mechanical ventilation avoidance, safety, adverse events
MeSH terms
COVID-19, COVID-19 Drug Treatment, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Boston, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Intubation, Male, Middle Aged, Respiratory Therapy, Treatment Failure, Disease Progression, Receptors, Interleukin-6, Young Adult, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review