Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 578

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Bedaquiline–Pretomanid–Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis

Open access
Conradie, Francesca, Bagdasaryan, Tatevik R., Borisov, Sergey, Howell, Pauline, Mikiashvili, Lali, Ngubane, Nosipho, Samoilova, Anastasia, Skornykova, Sergey, Tudor, Elena, Variava, Ebrahim, Yablonskiy, Petr, Everitt, Daniel, Wills, Genevieve H., Sun, Eugene, Olugbosi, Morounfolu, Egizi, Erica, Li, Mengchun, Holsta, Alda, Timm, Juliano, Bateson, Anna, Crook, Angela M., Fabiane, Stella M., Hunt, Robert, McHugh, Timothy D., Tweed, Conor D., Foraida, Salah, Mendel, Carl M., Spigelman, Melvin·2022·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid regimen has been reported to have 90% efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis, but the incidence of adverse events with 1200 mg of linezolid daily has been high. The appropriate dose of linezolid and duration of treatment with this agent to minimize toxic effects while maintaining efficacy against highly drug-resistant tuberculosis are unclear. METHODS: We enrolled participants with extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin, a fluoroquinolone, and an aminoglycoside), pre-XDR tuberculosis (i.e., resistant to rifampin and to either a fluoroquinolone or an aminoglycoside), or rifampin-resistant tuberculosis that was not responsive to treatment or for which a second-line regimen had been discontinued because of side effects. We randomly assigned the participants to receive bedaquiline for 26 weeks (200 mg daily for 8 weeks, then 100 mg daily for 18 weeks), pretomanid (200 mg daily for 26 weeks), and daily linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks. The primary end point in the modified intention-to-treat population was the incidence of an unfavorable outcome, defined as treatment failure or disease relapse (clinical or bacteriologic) at 26 weeks after completion of treatment. Safety was also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 181 participants were enrolled, 88% of whom had XDR or pre-XDR tuberculosis. Among participants who received bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid with linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks or 600 mg for 26 weeks or 9 weeks, 93%, 89%, 91%, and 84%, respectively, had a favorable outcome; peripheral neuropathy occurred in 38%, 24%, 24%, and 13%, respectively; myelosuppression occurred in 22%, 15%, 2%, and 7%, respectively; and the linezolid dose was modified (i.e., interrupted, reduced, or discontinued) in 51%, 30%, 13%, and 13%, respectively. Optic neuropathy developed in 4 participants (9%) who had received linezolid at a dose of 1200 mg for 26 weeks; all the cases resolved. Six of the seven unfavorable microbiologic outcomes through 78 weeks of follow-up occurred in participants assigned to the 9-week linezolid groups. CONCLUSIONS: A total of 84 to 93% of the participants across all four bedaquiline-pretomanid-linezolid treatment groups had a favorable outcome. The overall risk-benefit ratio favored the group that received the three-drug regimen with linezolid at a dose of 600 mg for 26 weeks, with a lower incidence of adverse events reported and fewer linezolid dose modifications. (Funded by the TB Alliance and others; ZeNix ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03086486.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2119430

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 9 references

Cited by

See all 578

Metadata

Authors
Conradie, F., Bagdasaryan, T. R., Borisov, S., Howell, P., Mikiashvili, L., Ngubane, N., Samoilova, A., Skornykova, S., Tudor, E., Variava, E., Yablonskiy, P., Everitt, D., Wills, G. H., Sun, E., Olugbosi, M., Egizi, E., Li, M., Holsta, A., Timm, J., Bateson, A., Crook, A. M., Fabiane, S. M., Hunt, R., McHugh, T. D., Tweed, C. D., Foraida, S., Mendel, C. M., & Spigelman, M.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2022-09
Volume
387
Issue
9
Pages
810-823
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4293842430
Cited by
578
References
9
FWCI
50.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bedaquiline–Pretomanid–Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2119430
The paper
Conradie, F., Bagdasaryan, T. R., Borisov, S., Howell, P., Mikiashvili, L., Ngubane, N., Samoilova, A., Skornykova, S., Tudor, E., Variava, E., Yablonskiy, P., Everitt, D., Wills, G. H., Sun, E., Olugbosi, M., Egizi, E., Li, M., Holsta, A., Timm, J., . . . Spigelman, M. (2022). Bedaquiline–Pretomanid–Linezolid Regimens for Drug-Resistant Tuberculosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2119430

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.