Cited by 467Colorectal Cancer Treatments and StudiesColorectal Cancer Surgical TreatmentsIntraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies

Trifluridine–tipiracil and bevacizumab in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer

Open access
Prager, Gerald W., Taieb, Julien, Fakih, Marwan, Ciardiello, Fortunato, Van Cutsem, Eric, Elez, Elena, Cruz, Felipe M., Wyrwicz, Lucjan +12 more·2023·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In a previous phase 3 trial, treatment with trifluridine-tipiracil (FTD-TPI) prolonged overall survival among patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Preliminary data from single-group and randomized phase 2 trials suggest that treatment with FTD-TPI in addition to bevacizumab has the potential to extend survival. METHODS: We randomly assigned, in a 1:1 ratio, adult patients who had received no more than two previous chemotherapy regimens for the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer to receive FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab (combination group) or FTD-TPI alone (FTD-TPI group). The primary end point was overall survival. Secondary end points were progression-free survival and safety, including the time to worsening of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more (on a scale from 0 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater disability). RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were assigned to each group. The median overall survival was 10.8 months in the combination group and 7.5 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for death, 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.49 to 0.77; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months in the combination group and 2.4 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.36 to 0.54; P<0.001). The most common adverse events in both groups were neutropenia, nausea, and anemia. No treatment-related deaths were reported. The median time to worsening of the ECOG performance-status score from 0 or 1 to 2 or more was 9.3 months in the combination group and 6.3 months in the FTD-TPI group (hazard ratio, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.67). CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with refractory metastatic colorectal cancer, treatment with FTD-TPI plus bevacizumab resulted in longer overall survival than FTD-TPI alone. (Funded by Servier and Taiho Oncology; SUNLIGHT ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04737187; EudraCT number, 2020-001976-14.).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2214963

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Prager, G. W., Taieb, J., Fakih, M., Ciardiello, F., Van Cutsem, E., Elez, E., Cruz, F. M., Wyrwicz, L., Stroyakovskiy, D., Pápai, Z., Poureau, P.-G., Liposits, G., Cremolini, C., Bondarenko, I., Modest, D. P., Benhadji, K. A., Amellal, N., Leger, C., Vidot, L., & Tabernero, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pisa (IT)
  • From the Department of Medicine I, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna (G.W.P.); the Department of Gastroenterology and Digestive Oncology, Georges Pompidou European Hospital, SIRIC Cancer Research for Personalized Medicine, Université Paris Cité, Paris (J. Taieb), the Department of Oncology, University Hospital, Brest (P.-G.P.), and Servier, Suresnes (N.A., C.L., L.V.) — all in France; City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA (M.F.); Dipartimento di Medicina di Precisione, Università degli Studi della Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples (F.C.), and the Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Translational Research on New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa (C.C.) — both in Italy; the Department of Digestive Oncology, University Hospitals Gasthuisberg and KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (E.V.C.); the Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d’Hebron Hospital Campus and Institute of Oncology, International Oncology Bureau–Quiron, Barcelona (E.E., J. ...
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2023-05-04
Volume
388
Issue
18
Pages
1657-1667
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4367835002
Cited by
467
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 135 · 2025: 145 · 2024: 151 · 2023: 36
FWCI
58.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • SZTE Publicatio Repozitórium (University of Szeged) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • CINECA IRIS Institutial research information system (University of Pisa) (submittedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli" (submittedVersion)
  • Lirias (KU Leuven) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Taiho Oncology, Inc (N/A)
  • Servier (N/A)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Treatments and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies
Keywords
trifluridine/tipiracil, bevacizumab, metastatic colorectal cancer, refractory cancer, combination chemotherapy, overall survival, progression-free survival, ECOG performance status, neutropenia, adverse events, anti-VEGF therapy, oral fluoropyrimidine, second-line therapy
MeSH terms
Bevacizumab, Adult, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols, Colonic Neoplasms, Drug Combinations, Humans, Pyrrolidines, Rectal Neoplasms, Thymine, Trifluridine, Uracil, Colorectal Neoplasms

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review