The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Whether video laryngoscopy as compared with direct laryngoscopy increases the likelihood of successful tracheal intubation on the first attempt among critically ill adults is uncertain. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized trial conducted at 17 emergency departments and intensive care units (ICUs), we randomly assigned critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation to the video-laryngoscope group or the direct-laryngoscope group. The primary outcome was successful intubation on the first attempt. The secondary outcome was the occurrence of severe complications during intubation; severe complications were defined as severe hypoxemia, severe hypotension, new or increased vasopressor use, cardiac arrest, or death. RESULTS: The trial was stopped for efficacy at the time of the single preplanned interim analysis. Among 1417 patients who were included in the final analysis (91.5% of whom underwent intubation that was performed by an emergency medicine resident or a critical care fellow), successful intubation on the first attempt occurred in 600 of the 705 patients (85.1%) in the video-laryngoscope group and in 504 of the 712 patients (70.8%) in the direct-laryngoscope group (absolute risk difference, 14.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.9 to 18.7; P<0.001). A total of 151 patients (21.4%) in the video-laryngoscope group and 149 patients (20.9%) in the direct-laryngoscope group had a severe complication during intubation (absolute risk difference, 0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, -3.9 to 4.9). Safety outcomes, including esophageal intubation, injury to the teeth, and aspiration, were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation in an emergency department or ICU, the use of a video laryngoscope resulted in a higher incidence of successful intubation on the first attempt than the use of a direct laryngoscope. (Funded by the U.S. Department of Defense; DEVICE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05239195.).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Difficult tracheal intubation in obstetrics
CORMACK, R. S., & LEHANE, J. (1984) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.1984.tb08932.x · Cited by 2,471
Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts
Mort, T. C. (2004) · Anesthesia & Analgesia · doi:10.1213/01.ane.0000122825.04923.15 · Cited by 995
Guidelines for the management of tracheal intubation in critically ill adults
Higgs, A., McGrath, B. A., Goddard, C., Rangasami, J., Suntharalingam, G., Gale, R., & Cook, T. M. (2018) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1016/j.bja.2017.10.021 · Cited by 900
Cook, T. M., El‐Boghdadly, K., McGuire, B., McNarry, A. F., Patel, A., & Higgs, A. (2020) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.15054 · Cited by 886
Schandelmaier, S., Briel, M., Varadhan, R., Schmid, C. H., Devasenapathy, N., Hayward, R. A., Gagnier, J., Borenstein, M., van der Heijden, G. J. M. G., Dahabreh, I. J., et al. (2020) · Canadian Medical Association Journal · doi:10.1503/cmaj.200077 · Cited by 749
Intubation Practices and Adverse Peri-intubation Events in Critically Ill Patients From 29 Countries
Russotto, V., Myatra, S. N., Laffey, J. G., Tassistro, E., Antolini, L., Bauer, P., Lascarrou, J. B., Szuldrzynski, K., Camporota, L., Pelosi, P., et al. (2021) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2021.1727 · Cited by 637
Sakles, J. C., Chiu, S., Mosier, J., Walker, C., & Stolz, U. (2013) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.12055 · Cited by 565
Videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for adults undergoing tracheal intubation
Hansel, J., Rogers, A. M., Lewis, S. R., Cook, T. M., & Smith, A. F. (2022) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd011136.pub3 · Cited by 329
Myatra, S. N., Shah, A., Kundra, P., Patwa, A., Ramkumar, V., Divatia, J. V., Raveendra, U. S., Shetty, S. R., Ahmed, S. M., Doctor, J. R., et al. (2016) · Indian Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.4103/0019-5049.195481 · Cited by 294
El‐Boghdadly, K., Wong, D. J. N., Owen, R., Neuman, M. D., Pocock, S., Carlisle, J. B., Johnstone, C., Andruszkiewicz, P., Baker, P. A., Biccard, B. M., et al. (2020) · Anaesthesia · doi:10.1111/anae.15170 · Cited by 266
Metadata
- Authors
- Prekker, M. E., Driver, B. E., Trent, S. A., Resnick-Ault, D., Seitz, K. P., Russell, D. W., Gaillard, J. P., Latimer, A. J., Ghamande, S. A., Gibbs, K. W., Vonderhaar, D. J., Whitson, M. R., Barnes, C. R., Walco, J. P., Douglas, I. S., Krishnamoorthy, V., Dagan, A., Bastman, J. J., Lloyd, B. D., Gandotra, S., Goranson, J. K., Mitchell, S. H., White, H. D., Palakshappa, J. A., Espinera, A., Page, D. B., Joffe, A., Hansen, S. J., Hughes, C. G., George, T., Herbert, J. T., Shapiro, N. I., Schauer, S. G., Long, B. J., Imhoff, B., Wang, L., Rhoads, J. P., Womack, K. N., Janz, D. R., Self, W. H., Rice, T. W., Ginde, A. A., Casey, J. D., & Semler, M. W.
- Venue
- New England Journal of Medicine
- Publisher
- Massachusetts Medical Society
- Published
- 2023-08-03
- Volume
- 389
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 418-429
- ISSN
- 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
- 1533-4406
- OpenAlex
- W4380869863
- Cited by
- 346
- References
- 26
- FWCI
- 105.74
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmoa2301601
- The paper
- Prekker, M. E., Driver, B. E., Trent, S. A., Resnick-Ault, D., Seitz, K. P., Russell, D. W., Gaillard, J. P., Latimer, A. J., Ghamande, S. A., Gibbs, K. W., Vonderhaar, D. J., Whitson, M. R., Barnes, C. R., Walco, J. P., Douglas, I. S., Krishnamoorthy, V., Dagan, A., Bastman, J. J., Lloyd, B. D., . . . Semler, M. W. (2023). Video versus Direct Laryngoscopy for Tracheal Intubation of Critically Ill Adults. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa2301601
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
