The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts
Abstract
In Brief Repeated conventional tracheal intubation attempts may contribute to patient morbidity. Criticallyill patients (n = 2833) suffering from cardiovascular, pulmonary, metabolic, neurologic, or trauma-related deterioration were entered into an emergency intubation quality improvement database. This practice analysis was evaluated for airway and hemodynamic-related complications based on a set of defined variables that were correlated to the number of attempts required to successfully intubate the trachea outside the operating room. There was a significant increase in the rate of airway-related complications as the number of laryngoscopic attempts increased (≤2 versus >2 attempts): hypoxemia (11.8% versus 70%), regurgitation of gastric contents (1.9% versus 22%), aspiration of gastric contents (0.8% versus 13%) bradycardia (1.6% versus 21%), and cardiac arrest (0.7% versus 11%; P < 0.001). Although predictable, this analysis provides data that confirm the number of laryngoscopic attempts is associated with the incidence of airway and hemodynamic adverse events. These data support the recommendation of the ASA Task Force on the Management of the Difficult Airway to limit laryngoscopic attempts to three in lieu of the considerable patient injury that may occur. IMPLICATIONS: Intraoperative blood glucose control with 1 U of insulin for every 1–50 mg of blood glucose value more than 100 mg/dL added to 100 mL of 5% dextrose in a measured volume set was tested hourly. It is a simple and effective method and combines the advantages of combined glucose insulin and variable rate insulin infusion.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frerk, C., Mitchell, V. S., McNarry, A. F., Mendonca, C., Bhagrath, R., Patel, A., O’Sullivan, E. P., Woodall, N. M., & Ahmad, I. (2015) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aev371 · Cited by 2,214
Cook, T. M., Woodall, N., Harper, J., & Benger, J. (2011) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aer059 · Cited by 1,065
Techniques, Success, and Adverse Events of Emergency Department Adult Intubations
Brown, C. A., Bair, A. E., Pallin, D. J., & Walls, R. M. (2015) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.036 · Cited by 431
for the Canadian Airway Focus Group, Law, J. A., Broemling, N., Cooper, R. M., Drolet, P., Duggan, L. V., Griesdale, D. E., Hung, O. R., Jones, P. M., Kovacs, G., et al. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3 · Cited by 358
Incidence and factors associated with cardiac arrest complicating emergency airway management
Heffner, A. C., Swords, D. S., Neale, M. N., & Jones, A. E. (2013) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.07.022 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Mort, T. C.
- Venue
- Anesthesia & Analgesia
- Published
- 2004-08
- Volume
- 99
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 607-613
- ISSN
- 0003-2999 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2163335760
- Cited by
- 995
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 20.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1213/01.ane.0000122825.04923.15
- The paper
- Mort, T. C. (2004). Emergency Tracheal Intubation: Complications Associated with Repeated Laryngoscopic Attempts. Anesthesia & Analgesia. https://doi.org/10.1213/01.ane.0000122825.04923.15
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.