The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: The goal of this study was to determine the association of first pass success with the incidence of adverse events (AE s) during emergency department (ED) intubations. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected continuous quality improvement data based on orotracheal intubations performed in an academic ED over a 4‐year period. Following each intubation, the operator completed a data form regarding multiple aspects of the intubation, including patient and operator characteristics, method of intubation, device used, the number of attempts required, and AE s. Numerous AE s were tracked and included events such as witnessed aspiration, oxygen desaturation, esophageal intubation, hypotension, dysrhythmia, and cardiac arrest. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the relationship between the primary predictor variable of interest, first pass success, and the outcome variable, the presence of one or more AE s, after controlling for various other potential risk factors and confounders. Results: Over the 4‐year study period, there were 1,828 orotracheal intubations. If the intubation was successful on the first attempt, the incidence of one or more AEs was 14.2% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 12.4% to 16.2%). In cases requiring two attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 47.2% (95% CI = 41.8% to 52.7%); in cases requiring three attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 63.6% (95% CI = 53.7% to 72.6%); and in cases requiring four or more attempts, the incidence of one or more AEs was 70.6% (95% CI = 56.2.3% to 82.5%). Multivariable logistic regression showed that more than one attempt at tracheal intubation was a significant predictor of one or more AEs (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 7.52, 95% CI = 5.86 to 9.63). Conclusions: When performing orotracheal intubation in the ED, first pass success is associated with a relatively small incidence of AE s. As the number of attempts increases, the incidence of AE s increases substantially.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Frerk, C., Mitchell, V. S., McNarry, A. F., Mendonca, C., Bhagrath, R., Patel, A., O’Sullivan, E. P., Woodall, N. M., & Ahmad, I. (2015) · British Journal of Anaesthesia · doi:10.1093/bja/aev371 · Cited by 2,214
Techniques, Success, and Adverse Events of Emergency Department Adult Intubations
Brown, C. A., Bair, A. E., Pallin, D. J., & Walls, R. M. (2015) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.10.036 · Cited by 431
for the Canadian Airway Focus Group, Law, J. A., Broemling, N., Cooper, R. M., Drolet, P., Duggan, L. V., Griesdale, D. E., Hung, O. R., Jones, P. M., Kovacs, G., et al. (2013) · Canadian Journal of Anesthesia/Journal canadien d'anesthésie · doi:10.1007/s12630-013-0019-3 · Cited by 358
Bodily, J. B., Webb, H. R., Weiss, S. J., & Braude, D. A. (2016) · Annals of Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.06.006 · Cited by 83
Sakles, J. C., Corn, G. J., Hollinger, P., Arcaris, B., Patanwala, A. E., & Mosier, J. M. (2017) · Academic Emergency Medicine · doi:10.1111/acem.13160 · Cited by 56
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Sakles, J. C., Chiu, S., Mosier, J., Walker, C., & Stolz, U.
- Venue
- Academic Emergency Medicine
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-01
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 71-78
- ISSN
- 1069-6563 (ISSN-L)
- 1553-2712
- OpenAlex
- W2124783877
- Cited by
- 565
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 38.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/acem.12055
- The paper
- Sakles, J. C., Chiu, S., Mosier, J., Walker, C., & Stolz, U. (2013). The Importance of First Pass Success When Performing Orotracheal Intubation in the Emergency Department. Academic Emergency Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.12055
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.