Cited by 142Renal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesChronic Kidney Disease and DiabetesRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Atrasentan in Patients with IgA Nephropathy

Open access

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Patients with IgA nephropathy and severe proteinuria have a high lifetime risk of kidney failure. The efficacy and safety of the selective endothelin type A receptor antagonist atrasentan in reducing proteinuria in patients with IgA nephropathy are incompletely understood. METHODS: of body-surface area. Patients were randomly assigned to receive atrasentan (0.75 mg per day) or matched placebo for 132 weeks. The primary outcome, assessed at a prespecified interim analysis of data from the first 270 patients in the main stratum, was the change in the 24-hour urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio from baseline to week 36; the change was estimated with the use of a repeated-measures model. (An exploratory stratum of patients who were receiving a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor were included in a separate analysis.) Safety analyses were based on adverse events across the entire main stratum. RESULTS: A total of 340 patients were recruited into the main stratum. Among the first 270 patients in the main stratum (135 per trial group) who completed the week 36 visit, the geometric mean percentage change in the urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio relative to baseline was significantly greater with atrasentan (-38.1%) than with placebo (-3.1%), with a geometric mean between-group difference of -36.1 percentage points (95% confidence interval, -44.6 to -26.4; P<0.001). The percentage of patients with adverse events did not differ substantially between the two groups. Fluid retention was reported by 19 of 169 patients (11.2%) in the atrasentan group and in 14 of 170 (8.2%) in the placebo group but did not lead to discontinuation of the trial regimen. No apparent cases of cardiac failure or severe edema occurred. CONCLUSIONS: In this prespecified interim analysis, atrasentan resulted in a significant and clinically meaningful reduction in proteinuria as compared with placebo in patients with IgA nephropathy. (Funded by Novartis; ALIGN ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04573478.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2409415

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 10.1053/j.akdh.2024.04.002 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/j.kint.2021.05.021 · DOI
  3. 10.1038/ki.2014.143 · DOI
  4. 10.1124/pr.115.011833 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1016/j.ekir.2021.03.396 · DOI
  6. 10.2337/db15-1413 · DOI
  7. Kim S-G, Vo N, Lee S-H, et al. Atrasentan for the treatment of IgA nephropathy: interim results of the AFFINITY study. Kidney Int Rep 2023;8:1902-1902 (https://www.kireports.org/article/S2468-0249(23)01207-X/fulltext). · DOI
  8. 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30772-X · DOI
  9. Heerspink HJL, Jardine M, Kohan DE, et al. Study design and baseline characteristics of ALIGN, a randomized controlled study of atrasentan in patients with IgA nephropathy. Kidney Int Rep (in press) (https://www.kireports.org/article/S2468-0249(24)01962-4/fulltext).
  10. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00569-X · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)02302-4 · DOI
  12. 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01554-4 · DOI
  13. 10.1681/ASN.2009060593 · DOI
  14. 10.1161/JAHA.116.003896 · DOI
  15. 10.2215/CJN.08600718 · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Heerspink, H. J. L., Jardine, M., Kohan, D. E., Lafayette, R. A., Levin, A., Liew, A., Zhang, H., Lodha, A., Gray, T., Wang, Y., Renfurm, R., & Barratt, J.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Novartis (Switzerland) (CH)
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2025-02-06
Volume
392
Issue
6
Pages
544-554
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4403753361
Cited by
142
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 79 · 2025: 56
FWCI
37.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
Novartis
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Keywords
atrasentan, IgA nephropathy, proteinuria, urine protein-to-creatinine ratio, fluid retention, SGLT2 inhibitors, kidney failure risk
MeSH terms
Atrasentan, Adult, Creatinine, Double-Blind Method, Female, Glomerular Filtration Rate, Glomerulonephritis, IGA, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Proteinuria, Treatment Outcome, Endothelin A Receptor Antagonists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review