Cited by 184Xenotransplantation and immune responseAnimal Genetics and ReproductionRenal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Xenotransplantation of a Porcine Kidney for End-Stage Kidney Disease

Abstract

Xenotransplantation offers a potential solution to the organ shortage crisis. A 62-year-old hemodialysis-dependent man with long-standing diabetes, advanced vasculopathy, and marked dialysis-access challenges received a gene-edited porcine kidney with 69 genomic edits, including deletion of three glycan antigens, inactivation of porcine endogenous retroviruses, and insertion of seven human transgenes. The xenograft functioned immediately. The patient's creatinine levels decreased promptly and progressively, and dialysis was no longer needed. After a T-cell-mediated rejection episode on day 8, intensified immunosuppression reversed rejection. Despite sustained kidney function, the patient died from unexpected, sudden cardiac causes on day 52; autopsy revealed severe coronary artery disease and ventricular scarring without evident xenograft rejection. (Funded by Massachusetts General Hospital and eGenesis.).

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmoa2412747

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kawai, T., Williams, W. W., Elias, N., Fishman, J. A., Crisalli, K., Longchamp, A., Rosales, I. A., Duggan, M., Kimura, S., Morena, L., Borges, T. J., Tomosugi, T., Karadagi, A., Nakamura, T., Safa, K., Giarraputo, A., Avillach, C. T., Patalas, E. D., Smith, R. N., Sachs, D. H., Cosimi, A. B., Madsen, J. C., Cooper, D. K. C., Pierson, R., Perrin, S., Anand, R. P., Chhangawala, S., Coscarella, M., Daigneault, A., Li, F., Pearce, O., Qin, W., Serkin, W. T., Yeung, V., Getchell, K., Low, S. C., Curtis, M., Colvin, R. B., & Riella, L. V.
Affiliations
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Transplant Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
  • Eledon Pharmaceuticals, Irvine, CA
  • eGenesis, Cambridge, MA
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2025-05-15
Volume
392
Issue
19
Pages
1933-1940
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W4407259548
Cited by
184
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 112 · 2025: 72
FWCI
128.84
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • New England Journal of Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (U19AI090959)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Xenotransplantation and immune response
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Animal Genetics and Reproduction
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments
Keywords
xenotransplantation, porcine kidney, end-stage renal disease, gene-edited pigs, porcine endogenous retroviruses, T cell-mediated rejection, immunosuppression, hemodialysis dependence, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, organ shortage
MeSH terms
Animals, Coronary Artery Disease, Graft Rejection, Humans, Immunosuppressive Agents, Kidney, Kidney Failure, Chronic, Male, Middle Aged, Swine, Transplantation, Heterologous, Kidney Transplantation, Fatal Outcome, Animals, Genetically Modified, Heterografts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review