Cited by 497

The Randomized Registry Trial — The Next Disruptive Technology in Clinical Research?

Lauer, Michael S., D'Agostino, Ralph B.·2013·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The registry-based randomized trial may make less expensive, more efficient clinical studies possible. But before the new study design can be widely used, questions about the quality of the underlying data sets must be addressed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmp1310102

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • RCTs can suffer from a high risk of failure and a restricted external validity, limiting conclusions on effectiveness in clinical practice settings-if ideal conditions cannot be realized.

    “Finally, RCTs can suffer from a high risk of failure and a restricted external validity, limiting conclusions on effectiveness in clinical practice settings—if ideal conditions cannot be realized (Lauer and D'Agostino 2013).”

    From Dental Research in the Digital Age: The Registry-Based Clinical Trial. (2026) · cites this paper as Lauer and D'Agostino 2013

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lauer, M. S., & D'Agostino, R. B.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2013-10-24
Volume
369
Issue
17
Pages
1579-1581
ISSN
  • 0028-4793
  • 1533-4406
Cited by
497
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review