Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 386

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis

Barnes, Peter F., Cave, M. Donald·2003·New England Journal of Medicine

Abstract

The ability to determine the genotype of Mycobacterium tuberculosis is changing our understanding of the dynamics of tuberculosis transmission. This review summarizes the methods of genotyping and explains how they can assist clinical management. These techniques can be used to evaluate tuberculosis-control programs and provide clues to the pathogenesis of tuberculosis infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1056/nejmra021964

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 38 references

Cited by

See all 386

Metadata

Authors
Barnes, P. F., & Cave, M. D.
Venue
New England Journal of Medicine
Published
2003-09-18
Volume
349
Issue
12
Pages
1149-1156
ISSN
  • 0028-4793 (ISSN-L)
  • 1533-4406
OpenAlex
W2061813195
Cited by
386
References
38
FWCI
16.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1056/nejmra021964
The paper
Barnes, P. F., & Cave, M. D. (2003). Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis. New England Journal of Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmra021964

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.