The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility
Open accessAbstract
In this study, the currently known typing methods for Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates were evaluated with regard to reproducibility, discrimination, and specificity. Therefore, 90 M. tuberculosis complex strains, originating from 38 countries, were tested in five restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing methods and in seven PCR-based assays. In all methods, one or more repetitive DNA elements were targeted. The strain typing and the DNA fingerprint analysis were performed in the laboratory most experienced in the respective method. To examine intralaboratory reproducibility, blinded duplicate samples were included. The specificities of the various methods were tested by inclusion of 10 non- M. tuberculosis complex strains. All five RFLP typing methods were highly reproducible. The reliability of the PCR-based methods was highest for the mixed-linker PCR, followed by variable numbers of tandem repeat (VNTR) typing and spoligotyping. In contrast, the double repetitive element PCR (DRE-PCR), IS 6110 inverse PCR, IS 6110 ampliprinting, and arbitrarily primed PCR (APPCR) typing were found to be poorly reproducible. The 90 strains were best discriminated by IS 6110 RFLP typing, yielding 84 different banding patterns, followed by mixed-linker PCR (81 patterns), APPCR (71 patterns), RFLP using the polymorphic GC-rich sequence as a probe (70 patterns), DRE-PCR (63 patterns), spoligotyping (61 patterns), and VNTR typing (56 patterns). We conclude that for epidemiological investigations, strain differentiation by IS 6110 RFLP or mixed-linker PCR are the methods of choice. A strong association was found between the results of different genetic markers, indicating a clonal population structure of M. tuberculosis strains. Several separate genotype families within the M. tuberculosis complex could be recognized on the basis of the genetic markers used.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deciphering the biology of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from the complete genome sequence
Cole, S. T., Brosch, R., Parkhill, J., Garnier, T., Churcher, C., Harris, D., Gordon, S. V., Eiglmeier, K., Gas, S., Barry, C. E., et al. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/31159 · Cited by 7,847
The catalase—peroxidase gene and isoniazid resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis
Zhang, Y., Heym, B., Allen, B., Young, D., & Cole, S. (1992) · Nature · doi:10.1038/358591a0 · Cited by 1,299
van Soolingen, D., Hermans, P. W., de Haas, P. E., & van Embden, J. D. (1992) · Journal of Clinical Microbiology · doi:10.1128/jcm.30.7.1772-1777.1992 · Cited by 139
Self-citation
Cited by
Molecular Epidemiology of Tuberculosis
Barnes, P. F., & Cave, M. D. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra021964 · Cited by 386
Bottlenecks and broomsticks: the molecular evolution of Mycobacterium bovis
Smith, N. H., Gordon, S. V., de la Rua-Domenech, R., Clifton-Hadley, R. S., & Hewinson, R. G. (2006) · Nature Reviews Microbiology · doi:10.1038/nrmicro1472 · Cited by 375
Control and prevention of tuberculosis in the United Kingdom: Code of Practice 2000
Joint Tuberculosis Committee of the British Thoracic Society (2000) · Thorax · doi:10.1136/thorax.55.11.887 · Cited by 366
Lindstedt, B. (2005) · ELECTROPHORESIS · doi:10.1002/elps.200500096 · Cited by 329
Tracing isolates of bacterial species by multilocus variable number of tandem repeat analysis (MLVA)
Van Belkum, A. (2007) · FEMS Immunology & Medical Microbiology · doi:10.1111/j.1574-695x.2006.00173.x · Cited by 203
Metadata
- Authors
- Kremer, K., van Soolingen, D., Frothingham, R., Haas, W. H., Hermans, P. W. M., Martín, C., Palittapongarnpim, P., Plikaytis, B. B., Riley, L. W., Yakrus, M. A., Musser, J. M., & van Embden, J. D. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Microbiology
- Publisher
- American Society for Microbiology
- Published
- 1999-08
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 2607-2618
- ISSN
- 0095-1137 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-660X
- OpenAlex
- W2135717170
- Cited by
- 579
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 25.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1128/jcm.37.8.2607-2618.1999
- The paper
- Kremer, K., van Soolingen, D., Frothingham, R., Haas, W. H., Hermans, P. W. M., Martín, C., Palittapongarnpim, P., Plikaytis, B. B., Riley, L. W., Yakrus, M. A., Musser, J. M., & van Embden, J. D. A. (1999). Comparison of Methods Based on Different Molecular Epidemiological Markers for Typing of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Complex Strains: Interlaboratory Study of Discriminatory Power and Reproducibility. Journal of Clinical Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.8.2607-2618.1999
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.